World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Monnica T. Williams

Monnica T. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 5063 4697 338 315 185 8039

Monnica T. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Monnica T. Williams between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Monnica T. Williams published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2024. 23 of the 267 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2024. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

267 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Monnica T. Williams: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 3
2012 11
2013 10
2014 3
2015 9
2016 10
2017 14
2018 15
2019 15
2020 24
2021 32
2022 28
2023 24
2024 39
2025 22
2026 1
Total 267
Download as CSV

Monnica T. Williams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monnica T. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 185 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 185
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Monnica T. Williams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monnica T. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Monnica T. Williams is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research spans several main fields, primarily Psychology and Social Sciences, with a notable focus on Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science as major subfields. Their work also encompasses Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Organic Chemistry.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range of areas including:

  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Monnica T. Williams has published extensively, with many papers appearing in prominent venues such as Behavior Therapy, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Frontiers in Psychology, Perspectives on Psychological Science, and the Journal of Psychedelic Studies.

Significant recent papers include:

  • "After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy," 2021, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "People of color in North America report improvements in racial trauma and mental health symptoms following psychedelic experiences," 2020, published in Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
  • "A Systematic Review of Black People Coping With Racism: Approaches, Analysis, and Empowerment," 2022, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Addressing microaggressions in racially charged patient-provider interactions: a pilot randomized trial," 2020, published in BMC Medical Education
  • "Racial and Language Microaggressions in the School Ecology," 2021, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science

They have also contributed to book publications, notably with titles such as Managing Microaggressions (Oxford University Press, 2020) and Deliberate practice in psychedelic-assisted therapy. (American Psychological Association, 2024).

Frequent collaborators include Sonya C. Faber, Shannon Dames, Andrew Penn, Joseph A. Zamaria, and Tony Rousmaniere, reflecting ongoing partnerships across multiple studies.

Best Publications

  • Microaggressions: Clarification, Evidence, and Impact:

    Monnica T Williams

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy vs Risperidone for Augmenting Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Helen Blair Simpson;Helen Blair Simpson;Edna B. Foa;Michael R. Liebowitz;Jonathan D. Huppert;Jonathan D. Huppert

  • Assessing Racial Trauma Within a DSM–5 Framework: The UConn Racial/Ethnic Stress & Trauma Survey

    Monnica T. Williams;Isha W. Metzger;Chris Leins;Celenia DeLapp

  • Inclusion of people of color in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: a review of the literature

    Timothy I. Michaels;Jennifer Purdon;Jennifer Purdon;Alexis Collins;Monnica T. Williams;Monnica T. Williams

  • The role of ethnic identity in symptoms of anxiety and depression in African Americans.

    Monnica Terwilliger Williams;Lloyd Kevin Chapman;Judy Wong;Eric Turkheimer

  • The psychedelic renaissance and the limitations of a White-dominant medical framework: A call for indigenous and ethnic minority inclusion

    Jamilah R. George;Jamilah R. George;Timothy I. Michaels;Jae Sevelius;Monnica T. Williams;Monnica T. Williams

  • A Systematic Review of Black People Coping With Racism: Approaches, Analysis, and Empowerment

    Unknown

  • Cultural Adaptations of Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Treatment and Prevention of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in African Americans

    Monnica T. Williams;Emily Malcoun;Broderick A. Sawyer;Darlene M. Davis

  • Minority participation in randomized controlled trials for obsessive–compulsive disorder

    Monnica Williams;Mark Powers;Yeo Gin Yun;Edna Foa

  • Myth of the pure obsessional type in obsessive--compulsive disorder.

    Monnica T. Williams;G B A Samantha Farris;Eric Turkheimer;Anthony Pinto

  • Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: phenomenology and treatment outcomes with exposure and ritual prevention.

    Monnica T. Williams;Beth Mugno;Martin Franklin;Sonya Faber

  • Barriers to treatment among African Americans with obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Monnica T. Williams;Julian Domanico;Luana Marques;Nicole J. Leblanc

  • After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy.

    Monnica T. Williams;Matthew D. Skinta;Renée Martin-Willett

  • Common Pitfalls in Exposure and Response Prevention (EX/RP) for OCD.

    Seth J. Gillihan;Monnica T. Williams;Emily Malcoun;Elna Yadin

  • Assessing racial trauma with the Trauma Symptoms of Discrimination Scale

    Monnica T. Williams;Destiny M. B. Printz;Ryan C. T. DeLapp

  • A model of intersectional stress and trauma in Asian American sexual and gender minorities.

    Terence H. W. Ching;Sharon Y. Lee;Julia Chen;Rachel P. So

  • The Traumatizing Impact of Racism in Canadians of Colour

    Unknown

  • Sexual orientation obsessions in obsessive–compulsive disorder: Prevalence and correlates

    Monnica T. Williams;Samantha G. Farris

  • The impact of symptom dimensions on outcome for exposure and ritual prevention therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Monnica T. Williams;Samantha G. Farris;Eric N. Turkheimer;Martin E. Franklin

  • People of color in North America report improvements in racial trauma and mental health symptoms following psychedelic experiences.

    Monnica T. Williams;Monnica T. Williams;Alan K. Davis;Alan K. Davis;Yitong Xin;Nathan D. Sepeda

  • A Preliminary Report on the Relationship Between Microaggressions Against Black People and Racism Among White College Students

    Jonathan W. Kanter;Monnica T. Williams;Adam M. Kuczynski;Katherine E. Manbeck

  • Missed diagnoses in African Americans with obsessive-compulsive disorder: the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I)

    Gregory S. Chasson;Monnica T. Williams;Darlene M. Davis;Jessica Y. Combs

Frequent Co-Authors

Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania
Eric Turkheimer
Eric Turkheimer University of Virginia
Jonathan W. Kanter
Jonathan W. Kanter University of Washington
Mark B. Powers
Mark B. Powers Baylor University Medical Center
Jonathan D. Huppert
Jonathan D. Huppert Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Martin E. Franklin
Martin E. Franklin University of Pennsylvania
Robert Joseph Taylor
Robert Joseph Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Linda M. Chatters
Linda M. Chatters University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph A. Himle
Joseph A. Himle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael R. Liebowitz
Michael R. Liebowitz Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens many exciting online degree options and diverse career pathways, especially for those interested in mental health and counseling. A popular and growing path is substance abuse counseling, a career that addresses the vital need for professionals who can guide individuals through addiction recovery.

Requirements for becoming a certified counselor can vary by state and city, so it’s important to research local regulations. For example, you can learn about Detroit substance abuse counselor certification requirements or look into the Durham substance abuse counselor certification requirements.

Aspiring professionals may also want to examine the El Paso substance abuse counselor certification requirements and Fort Wayne substance abuse counselor certification requirements to compare regional expectations.

Completing an online psychology degree can be a flexible way to meet educational prerequisites for counseling licensure. Investigating these pathways early helps students tailor their academic plans, ensuring they are prepared to meet local professional standards and launch a rewarding career in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Monnica T. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles