World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael G. Wheaton

Michael G. Wheaton

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8828 8244 4697 4275 110 6609

Michael G. Wheaton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael G. Wheaton between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael G. Wheaton published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2016. 18 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2016. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications
2007 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael G. Wheaton: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 7
2011 8
2012 5
2013 10
2014 2
2015 6
2016 11
2017 6
2018 3
2019 6
2020 4
2021 11
2022 10
2023 9
2024 10
2025 8
Total 123
Download as CSV

Michael G. Wheaton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael G. Wheaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael G. Wheaton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael G. Wheaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael G. Wheaton is affiliated with Barnard College in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of psychology. Their work encompasses several subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and social psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects related to mental health and cognitive processes. Main topics include obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, autism spectrum disorder research, body image and dysmorphia studies, eating disorders and behaviors, COVID-19 and mental health, and sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Michael G. Wheaton has published multiple recent papers focusing largely on the psychological effects related to the COVID-19 pandemic and anxiety disorders. Notable papers include:

  • "Is Fear of COVID-19 Contagious? The Effects of Emotion Contagion and Social Media Use on Anxiety in Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Intolerance of uncertainty as a factor linking obsessive-compulsive symptoms, health anxiety and concerns about the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States" (2020, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders)
  • "How is the COVID-19 pandemic affecting individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms?" (2021, Journal of Anxiety Disorders)

Other relevant research includes investigations into the role of digital emotion contagion in anxiety and parental stress, as well as broader studies on health anxiety and contamination fears during pandemics.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wheaton include:

  • H. Blair Simpson
  • Þröstur Björgvinsson
  • Kristen Hagen
  • Bjarne Hansen
  • Edna B. Foa

The scientist's research has been published repeatedly in key journals such as:

  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research

With a total publication count of over 100 in psychology, Michael G. Wheaton's contributions are focused strongly on understanding the mechanisms and effects of obsessive-compulsive disorder and anxiety-related disorders, especially within the context of recent global health challenges.

Best Publications

  • Assessment of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions: development and evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Brett J. Deacon;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Michael G. Wheaton

  • Psychological Predictors of Anxiety in Response to the H1N1 (Swine Flu) Pandemic

    Michael G. Wheaton;Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Noah C. Berman;Laura E. Fabricant

  • Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity in the anxiety disorders: evaluation of the ASI-3.

    Michael G. Wheaton;Brett J. Deacon;Patrick B. McGrath;Noah C. Berman

  • What's wrong with my mouse model? Advances and strategies in animal modeling of anxiety and depression.

    A.V. Kalueff;M. Wheaton;D.L. Murphy

  • The relationship between obsessive beliefs and symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Michael G. Wheaton;Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Noah C. Berman;Bradley C. Riemann

  • Characterizing the hoarding phenotype in individuals with OCD: associations with comorbidity, severity and gender.

    Michael Wheaton;Kiara R. Timpano;V. Holland LaSalle-Ricci;Dennis L. Murphy

  • The status of hoarding as a symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Michael G. Wheaton;Eric A. Storch

  • Obsessive-compulsive symptoms: the contribution of obsessional beliefs and experiential avoidance.

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Gerald R. Lackey;Michael G. Wheaton

  • Predicting anxiety: the role of experiential avoidance and anxiety sensitivity.

    Noah C. Berman;Michael G. Wheaton;Patrick McGrath;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • A haplotype containing quantitative trait loci for SLC1A1 gene expression and its association with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Jens R. Wendland;Pablo R. Moya;Kiara R. Timpano;Adriana P. Anavitarte

  • Is Fear of COVID-19 Contagious? The Effects of Emotion Contagion and Social Media Use on Anxiety in Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic

    Michael G. Wheaton;Alena Prikhidko;Gabrielle R. Messner

  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder and its related disorders: a reappraisal of obsessive-compulsive spectrum concepts.

    Dennis L. Murphy;Kiara R. Timpano;Michael G. Wheaton;Benjamin D. Greenberg

  • Let me check that for you: Symptom accommodation in romantic partners of adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Sara E. Boeding;Christine M. Paprocki;Donald H Baucom;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • Treating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Intimate Relationships: A Pilot Study of Couple-Based Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

    Jonathan S. Abramowitz;Donald H. Baucom;Sara Boeding;Michael G. Wheaton

  • Enhancing Exposure and Response Prevention for OCD: A Couple-Based Approach.

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Donald H Baucom;Michael G. Wheaton;Sara Boeding

  • Health Anxiety: Latent Structure and Associations with Anxiety-related Psychological Processes in a Student Sample

    Michael G. Wheaton;Noah C. Berman;Joseph C. Franklin;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • The Relationship Between Obsessive Compulsive Beliefs and Symptoms, Anxiety and Disgust Sensitivity, and Swine Flu Fears

    Joseph Brand;Dean McKay;Michael G. Wheaton;Jonathan S. Abramowitz

  • The relationship between anxiety sensitivity and obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions.

    Michael G. Wheaton;Brittain Mahaffey;Kiara R. Timpano;Noah C. Berman

  • The Effect of Concerns About COVID-19 on Anxiety, Stress, Parental Burnout, and Emotion Regulation: The Role of Susceptibility to Digital Emotion Contagion.

    Alena Prikhidko;Haiying Long;Michael G. Wheaton

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
H. Blair Simpson
H. Blair Simpson Columbia University
Kiara R. Timpano
Kiara R. Timpano University of Miami
Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania
Dennis L. Murphy
Dennis L. Murphy National Institutes of Health
K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Brett J. Deacon
Brett J. Deacon University of Wollongong
Hanga Galfalvy
Hanga Galfalvy Columbia University
Bunmi O. Olatunji
Bunmi O. Olatunji Vanderbilt University
Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens access to various online programs and specialized career paths, especially in the counseling field. Many students are interested in becoming Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), a role that requires meeting specific educational and licensure standards that vary by state.

For example, Maryland licensed professional counselor requirements emphasize supervised clinical experience and a graduate degree in counseling. Aspiring professionals in the Northeast should review the Massachusetts licensed professional counselor requirements to understand that state's licensing process.

In the Midwest, the process can be different. Those seeking to practice in Michigan should familiarize themselves with the lpc licensure requirements in Michigan, which set particular standards for training and examinations. Similarly, those planning to work in Minnesota should explore how to get an lpc license in Minnesota for region-specific instructions.

With accredited online degrees now widely available, pursuing these pathways is more accessible than ever. However, it is crucial to select programs that meet the licensure requirements for the state where you plan to work, as standards can vary considerably.

Best Scientists Citing Michael G. Wheaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles