World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
12469
World Ranking
14331
National Ranking
1124

Noel D. McCarthy publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noel D. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 164 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Noel D. McCarthy D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noel D. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Noel D. McCarthy is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on infectious diseases, epidemiology, and public health, with a significant emphasis on understanding bacterial infections and respiratory illnesses.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several fields of study including:

  • Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Epidemiology
  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Food Science

Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Noel D. McCarthy span multiple influential journals and address critical issues in infectious disease surveillance and epidemiological analysis. Notable publications are:

  • Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: a prospective analysis of surveillance data, 2021, The Lancet Digital Health
  • Trends in invasive bacterial diseases during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: analyses of prospective surveillance data from 30 countries and territories in the IRIS Consortium, 2023, The Lancet Digital Health
  • Genomic Epidemiology Analysis of Infectious Disease Outbreaks Using TransPhylo, 2021, Current Protocols
  • Health inequalities in infectious diseases: a systematic overview of reviews, 2023, BMJ Open
  • Informing antimicrobial stewardship with explainable AI, 2023, PLOS Digital Health

McCarthy frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Massimo Cavallaro
  • Claire Jenkins
  • Brian Galvin
  • Keith A. Jolley
  • Martin Maiden

Their publications commonly appear in prominent venues known for epidemiological and infectious disease research such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Digital Health
  • BMJ Open
  • Epidemiology and Infection
  • European Journal of Public Health

Throughout their career, Noel D. McCarthy has contributed to advancing knowledge on respiratory infections, antimicrobial stewardship, and the application of machine learning techniques in healthcare settings.

Best Publications

  • CD8+ T-cell responses to different HIV proteins have discordant associations with viral load

    Photini Kiepiela;Kholiswa Ngumbela;Christina Thobakgale;Dhanwanthie Ramduth

  • MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics

    Martin C. J. Maiden;Melissa J. Jansen van Rensburg;James E. Bray;Sarah G. Earle

  • Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study

    Carolyn M Willis;Susannah M Church;Claire M Guest;W Andrew Cook

  • Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: a prospective analysis of surveillance data.

    Angela B. Brueggemann;Melissa J. Jansen van Rensburg;David Shaw;Noel D. McCarthy

  • Campylobacter Genotyping to Determine the Source of Human Infection

    Samuel K. Sheppard;John F. Dallas;Norval J. C. Strachan;Marian MacRae

  • Association of the metabolic syndrome with both vigorous and moderate physical activity

    KL Rennie;N McCarthy;S Yazdgerdi;M Marmot

  • An Outbreak of Rift Valley Fever in Northeastern Kenya, 1997-98

    Christopher W. Woods;Adam M. Karpati;Thomas Grein;Noel McCarthy

  • Distribution of Serogroups and Genotypes among Disease-Associated and Carried Isolates of Neisseria meningitidis from the Czech Republic, Greece, and Norway

    Siamak P. Yazdankhah;Paula Kriz;Georgina Tzanakaki;Jenny Kremastinou

  • Convergence of Campylobacter species: implications for bacterial evolution

    Samuel K. Sheppard;Noel D. McCarthy;Daniel Falush;Martin C. J. Maiden

  • Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome following Infection with Campylobacter jejuni

    Noel McCarthy;Johan Giesecke

  • Genetic Analysis of Meningococci Carried by Children and Young Adults

    Heike Claus;Martin C. J. Maiden;Daniel J. Wilson;Noel D. McCarthy

  • Assessment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission in Oxfordshire, UK, 2007–12, with whole pathogen genome sequences: an observational study

    Timothy M Walker;Maeve K Lalor;Agnieszka Broda;Agnieszka Broda;Luisa Saldana Ortega

  • Indirect effects of childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Tinevimbo Shiri;Samik Datta;Jason Madan;Alexander Tsertsvadze

  • Control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is associated with HLA-B*13 and targeting of multiple Gag-specific CD8+ T-cell epitopes

    Isobella Honeyborne;Andrew Prendergast;Florencia Pereyra;Alasdair Leslie

  • Campylobacter genotypes from food animals, environmental sources and clinical disease in Scotland 2005/6.

    Samuel K. Sheppard;John F Dallas;Marion MacRae;Noel D. McCarthy

  • Host-associated genetic import in Campylobacter jejuni.

    Noel D. McCarthy;Frances M. Colles;Kate E. Dingle;Mary C. Bagnall

  • Progressive genome-wide introgression in agricultural Campylobacter coli

    Samuel K. Sheppard;Samuel K. Sheppard;Xavier Didelot;Keith A. Jolley;Aaron E. Darling

  • Real-Time Genomic Epidemiological Evaluation of Human Campylobacter Isolates by Use of Whole-Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing

    Alison J. Cody;Noel D. McCarthy;Melissa Jansen van Rensburg;Tomide Isinkaye

  • Host Association of Campylobacter Genotypes Transcends Geographic Variation

    Samuel K. Sheppard;Frances Colles;Judith Richardson;Alison J. Cody

  • Comparing interferon-gamma release assays with tuberculin skin test for identifying latent tuberculosis infection that progresses to active tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Peter Auguste;Alexander Tsertsvadze;Joshua Pink;Rachel A. Court

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin C. J. Maiden
Martin C. J. Maiden University of Oxford
Samuel K. Sheppard
Samuel K. Sheppard University of Bath
Keith A. Jolley
Keith A. Jolley University of Oxford
Andrew J. Pollard
Andrew J. Pollard University of Oxford
Philip J. R. Goulder
Philip J. R. Goulder University of Oxford
Bruce D. Walker
Bruce D. Walker Harvard University
Kate E. Dingle
Kate E. Dingle University of Oxford
Daniel Falush
Daniel Falush Chinese Academy of Sciences
Derrick W. Crook
Derrick W. Crook University of Oxford
Olalekan A. Uthman
Olalekan A. Uthman University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of career paths in healthcare, research, and technology. For those interested in the business side of healthcare, pursuing the cheapest online mba in healthcare management can be a cost-effective way to expand your leadership potential while exploring opportunities in administration.

Many graduates also consider careers in medical coding and billing, which offer strong job prospects and remote work options. If you’re comparing certifications, it’s helpful to research the difference between cpc certification and other credentials, as each can impact your career trajectory.

Salaries in these fields can be attractive; check the latest figures for medical.coder salary to understand potential earnings. Before pursuing this path, you may also wish to consider whether is medical coding a good job for your lifestyle and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Noel D. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles