World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans-Jörg Schek

Hans-Jörg Schek

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
10845
World Ranking
7091
National Ranking
138

Hans-Jörg Schek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Jörg Schek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hans-Jörg Schek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Jörg Schek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - ACM Fellow For his outstanding contributions to the principles and practice of database management, for his outstanding leadership role in academia, and for his service to the ACM community.

Overview

Hans-Jörg Schek is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland. Their recent research contributions include a publication in 2022 titled Nachruf auf Prof. Dr. Albrecht Blaser, Hirschhorn, which appeared in the journal Datenbank-Spektrum.

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Peter Dadam
  • Klaus Küspert

Their work has been published in venues such as:

  • Datenbank-Spektrum

Hans-Jörg Schek has been recognized with the ACM Fellow award in 2001 for contributions related to database management principles and practice, leadership in academia, and service to the ACM community.

Best Publications

  • A Quantitative Analysis and Performance Study for Similarity-Search Methods in High-Dimensional Spaces

    Roger Weber;Hans-Jörg Schek;Stephen Blott

  • The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks

    Hans-Jörg Schek

  • The relational model with relation-valued attributes

    H J Schek;M H Scholl

  • Remarks on the algebra of non first normal form relations

    G. Jaeschke;H. J. Schek

  • Data Structures for an Integrated Data Base Management and Information Retrieval System

    Hans-Jörg Schek;Peter Pistor

  • Advances in Database Technology — EDBT'98

    Hans-Jörg Schek;Gustavo Alonso;Felix Saltor;Isidro Ramos

  • Atomicity and isolation for transactional processes

    Heiko Schuldt;Gustavo Alonso;Catriel Beeri;Hans-Jörg Schek

  • Spatio-Temporal Databases: The CHOROCHRONOS Approach

    T. Sellis;M. Koubarakis;A. Frank;S. Grumbach

  • Merging application-centric and data-centric approaches to support transaction-oriented multi-system workflows

    Y. Breitbart;A. Deacon;H.-J. Schek;A. Sheth

  • The DASDBS project: objectives, experiences, and future prospects

    H.-J. Schek;H.-B. Paul;M.H. Scholl;G. Weikum

  • Architecture and implementation of the Darmstadt database kernel system

    H. B. Paul;H. J. Schek;M. H. Scholl

  • FAS: a freshness-sensitive coordination middleware for a cluster of OLAP components

    Uwe Röhm;Klemens Böhm;Hans-Jörg Schek;Heiko Schuldt

  • A relational object model

    Marc H. Scholl;Hans-Jörg Schek

  • OLAP Query Routing and Physical Design in a Database Cluster

    Uwe Röhm;Klemens Böhm;Hans-Jörg Schek

  • Nested Relations and Complex Objects in Databases

    S. Abiteboul;P. C. Fischer;H. J. Schek

  • Setting the Foundations of Digital Libraries: The DELOS Manifesto

    Leonardo Candela;Donatella Castelli;Pasquale Pagano;Costantino Thanos

  • A signature access method for the Starburst database system

    W. W. Chang;H. J. Schek

  • OLAP Query Evaluation in a Database Cluster: A Performance Study on Intra-Query Parallelism

    Fuat Akal;Klemens Böhm;Hans-Jörg Schek

  • XMLTM: efficient transaction management for XML documents

    Torsten Grabs;Klemens Böhm;Hans-Jörg Schek

  • Concurrency control and recovery in transactional process management

    Heiko Schuldt;Gustavo Alonso;Hans-Jörg Schek

  • Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases

    Dennis McLeod;Ron Sacks-Davis;Hans-Jörg Schek

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerhard Weikum
Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Gustavo Alonso
Gustavo Alonso ETH Zurich
Yuri Breitbart
Yuri Breitbart Kent State University
Yannis E. Ioannidis
Yannis E. Ioannidis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Witold Litwin
Witold Litwin Paris Dauphine University
Christian S. Jensen
Christian S. Jensen Aalborg University
Ralf Hartmut Güting
Ralf Hartmut Güting University of Hagen
Peter Dadam
Peter Dadam University of Ulm
Peter Widmayer
Peter Widmayer ETH Zurich
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s important to explore related degrees and alternative career tracks, especially those offered online. Today, many reputable universities provide flexible, accredited programs that cater to both recent graduates and working professionals.

For example, data-driven roles are in high demand, and pursuing one of the best masters in data science online can help you specialize in areas like machine learning, analytics, or AI. Students interested in blending technology with leadership may consider the cheapest mba programs online to gain valuable business management skills.

Alternatively, the online construction management degree is ideal for those who wish to merge engineering and management skills within a specialized industry. If time is a key factor for you, there are also several 1 year masters programs that offer a fast-tracked route to earning your degree without sacrificing academic quality.

Each pathway unlocks unique opportunities and can be tailored to your career ambitions. Online learning makes it easier than ever to advance your education and skills from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Jörg Schek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles