World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 95 630 560 344 301 188 38647

Jun Qin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jun Qin between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jun Qin published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 10 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 4 publications
1999 2026

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jun Qin: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 9
2003 6
2004 13
2005 4
2006 7
2007 4
2008 15
2009 12
2010 15
2011 13
2012 8
2013 11
2014 8
2015 8
2016 12
2017 10
2018 11
2019 7
2020 10
2021 1
2022 1
2023 1
2024 3
2025 6
2026 4
Total 209
Download as CSV

Jun Qin publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jun Qin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 188 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112 188
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Jun Qin D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jun Qin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43 95
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jun Qin is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans several domains within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, contributing extensively to multiple subfields including molecular biology, physiology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, surgery, and oncology.

The scientist's work primarily centers on key topics such as DNA repair mechanisms, diet and metabolism studies, congenital heart defects research, bioinformatics and genomic networks, CRISPR and genetic engineering, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Jun Qin has published research in various academic journals, with frequent contributions to Molecular & Cellular Proteomics and arXiv (Cornell University), as well as Molecular Cell, Journal of Hepatology, and Cancer Cell.

  • A Surge of DNA Damage Links Transcriptional Reprogramming and Hematopoietic Deficit in Fanconi Anemia (2020, Molecular Cell)
  • Inhibition of PU.1 ameliorates metabolic dysfunction and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (2020, Journal of Hepatology)
  • AMPK Interactome Reveals New Function in Non-homologous End Joining DNA Repair (2020, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics)
  • Endoplasmic reticulum stress regulates the intestinal stem cell state through CtBP2 (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Discovery of Urinary Proteomic Signature for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis (2020, BioMed Research International)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Jun Qin include Sung Yun Jung, Junjie Chen, Zhen Chen, Chao Wang, and Xu Feng.

The scientist's work is recognized within the research community, as reflected by their fellowship as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) awarded in 2012.

Best Publications

  • MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription.

    Maria Chahrour;Sung Yun Jung;Chad Shaw;Xiaobo Zhou

  • SIN1/MIP1 Maintains rictor-mTOR Complex Integrity and Regulates Akt Phosphorylation and Substrate Specificity

    Estela Jacinto;Valeria Facchinetti;Dou Liu;Nelyn Soto

  • BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures

    Yi Wang;David Cortez;Parvin Yazdi;Norma Neff

  • Requirement of ATM-Dependent Phosphorylation of Brca1 in the DNA Damage Response to Double-Strand Breaks

    David Cortez;Yi Wang;Jun Qin;Stephen J. Elledge;Stephen J. Elledge

  • Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization

    Muyang Li;Delin Chen;Ariel Shiloh;Jianyuan Luo

  • ATR and ATRIP: Partners in Checkpoint Signaling

    David Cortez;Saritha Guntuku;Jun Qin;Stephen J. Elledge;Stephen J. Elledge

  • INVOLVEMENT OF THE TIP60 HISTONE ACETYLASE COMPLEX IN DNA REPAIR AND APOPTOSIS

    Tsuyoshi Ikura;Vasily V Ogryzko;Mikhail Grigoriev;Regina Groisman

  • Both corepressor proteins SMRT and N-CoR exist in large protein complexes containing HDAC3.

    Jiwen Li;Jin Wang;Jianxiang Wang;Zafar Nawaz

  • ARF-BP1/Mule Is a Critical Mediator of the ARF Tumor Suppressor

    Delin Chen;Ning Kon;Muyang Li;Wenzhu Zhang

  • Erk Associates with and Primes GSK-3β for Its Inactivation Resulting in Upregulation of β-Catenin

    Qingqing Ding;Weiya Xia;Jaw Ching Liu;Jer Yen Yang;Jer Yen Yang

  • SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint

    Parvin T. Yazdi;Yi Wang;Song Zhao;Nimitt Patel

  • The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 controls folding and stability of Akt and protein kinase C

    Valeria Facchinetti;Weiming Ouyang;Hua Wei;Nelyn Soto

  • Autophosphorylation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is required for rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks.

    Doug W. Chan;Doug W. Chan;Benjamin Ping Chi Chen;Sheela Prithivirajsingh;Akihiro Kurimasa;Akihiro Kurimasa

  • PTOP interacts with POT1 and regulates its localization to telomeres

    Dan Liu;Amin Safari;Matthew S O'Connor;Doug W. Chan

  • Negative regulation of the deacetylase SIRT1 by DBC1

    Wenhui Zhao;Jan-Philipp Kruse;Yi Tang;Sung Yun Jung

  • Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells

    Jiancong Liang;Ma Wan;Yi Zhang;Peili Gu;Peili Gu

  • Telosome, a Mammalian Telomere-associated Complex Formed by Multiple Telomeric Proteins

    Dan Liu;Matthew S. O'Connor;Jun Qin;Zhou Songyang

  • Purification and functional characterization of the human N-CoR complex: the roles of HDAC3, TBL1 and TBLR1

    Ho-Geun Yoon;Doug W. Chan;Zhi-Qing Huang;Jiwen Li

  • N-CoR Mediates DNA Methylation-Dependent Repression through a Methyl CpG Binding Protein Kaiso.

    Ho Geun Yoon;Doug W. Chan;Albert B. Reynolds;Jun Qin

  • Parc: A Cytoplasmic Anchor for p53

    Anatoly Y. Nikolaev;Muyang Li;Norbert Puskas;Jun Qin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kun Yang
Kun Yang Tsinghua University
Sung Yun Jung
Sung Yun Jung Baylor College of Medicine
Sophia Y. Tsai
Sophia Y. Tsai Baylor College of Medicine
Ming-Jer Tsai
Ming-Jer Tsai Baylor College of Medicine
Bert W. O'Malley
Bert W. O'Malley Baylor College of Medicine
Shunlin Liang
Shunlin Liang University of Hong Kong
Wei Gu
Wei Gu Columbia University
Jiemin Wong
Jiemin Wong East China Normal University
Xin-Hua Feng
Xin-Hua Feng Zhejiang University
Zhou Songyang
Zhou Songyang Sun Yat-sen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can unlock doors to a range of careers in science and healthcare. If you’re considering alternative or supplementary paths, many online programs offer flexible entry points. For example, professionals from unrelated backgrounds can access specialized training through online speech-language pathology prerequisites program designed for non-majors. These bridge programs are especially helpful if you want to diversify your credentials or shift fields.

Health and nursing degrees are other popular options with ample job prospects. Many institutions now offer best online bsn programs for non nurses, making it easier to transition into healthcare without previous nursing education. For those aiming higher, nurse practitioner roles are in demand, but salaries can vary widely. It’s helpful to compare pmhnp salary by state when considering your future options.

Time to qualification is also an important factor. If a rapid start is important to you, it’s valuable to learn about how long to become a nurse practitioner via online and accelerated pathways. This approach allows you to align career ambitions with your education timeline and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jun Qin

Trending Scientists