World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8524 7958 99 98 122 7222

Jordi Peña-Casanova publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jordi Peña-Casanova between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jordi Peña-Casanova published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2009. 5 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2009. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1985 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jordi Peña-Casanova: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 4
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 7
1998 5
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 6
2003 1
2004 5
2005 5
2006 4
2007 3
2008 4
2009 13
2010 6
2011 2
2012 9
2013 10
2014 5
2015 3
2016 8
2017 3
2018 4
2019 4
2020 2
2021 5
2022 5
2023 5
2024 4
2025 1
Total 147
Download as CSV

Jordi Peña-Casanova publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jordi Peña-Casanova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jordi Peña-Casanova D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jordi Peña-Casanova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jordi Peña-Casanova is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain. Their research profile centers primarily on medicine and neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry and mental health. They have contributed to 22 publications in medicine and 15 in neuroscience, further specializing in subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, physiology, neurology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The main areas of research include dementia and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, functional brain connectivity studies, and the neurobiology of language and bilingualism. Other research topics involve neurological disorders and treatments, neural dynamics and brain function, as well as blood pressure and hypertension studies.

The scientist has published research in various peer-reviewed journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Neurología (English Edition)
  • Neurología
  • Lurian Journal
  • Cortex
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jordi Peña-Casanova are:

  • "Validation of the Neuronorma battery for neuropsychological assessment in multiple sclerosis," 2020, published in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • "Neuropsychological Assessment for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Dementia: Current Knowledge and New Insights," 2024, published in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "The CORCOBIA study: Cut-off points of Alzheimer's disease CSF biomarkers in a clinical cohort," 2022, published in Neurología (English Edition)
  • "Estudios normativos españoles (proyecto NEURONORMA-Plus): Normas para el Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), la Figura Compleja Modificada de Taylor (FCMT) y el Ruff-Light Trail Learning Test (RULIT)," 2021, published in Neurología
  • "Updating functional brain units: Insights far beyond Luria," 2024, published in Cortex

Jordi Peña-Casanova frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides
  • Albert Puig-Pijoan
  • Greta García-Escobar
  • R.M. Manero
  • Carmen Pérez-Enríquez

The diversity of venues and topics indicates a multidisciplinary approach within clinical neuroscience and neuropsychology, reflecting an interest in both the practical assessment tools for neurological conditions and the biological understanding of brain function. Their research outputs focus on cognitive assessment methodologies, neurodegenerative diseases, and brain connectivity, supporting the medical and neurological fields.

Best Publications

  • Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of efficacy

    Javier Olazarán;Barry Reisberg;Linda Clare;Isabel Cruz

  • Clinical validity of the 'mini-mental state' for Spanish speaking communities.

    Rafael Blesa;Montse Pujol;Miguel Aguilar;Pilar Santacruz

  • Benefits of cognitive-motor intervention in MCI and mild to moderate Alzheimer disease

    J. Olazarán;R. Muñiz;B. Reisberg;J. Peña-Casanova

  • Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): norms for verbal fluency tests.

    Jordi Peña-Casanova;Sonia Quiñones-Úbeda;Nina Gramunt-Fombuena;María Quintana-Aparicio

  • Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): Methods and Sample Characteristics

    Jordi Pena-Casanova;Rafael Blesa;Miquel Aguilar;Nina Gramunt-Fombuena

  • PROGRAMA INTEGRADO DE EXPLORACIÓN NEUROPSICOLÓGICA - TEST BARCELONA: BASES TEÓRICAS, OBJETIVOS Y CONTENIDOS

    J. Peña-Casanova

  • Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): norms for verbal span, visuospatial span, letter and number sequencing, trail making test, and symbol digit modalities test.

    Jordi Peña-Casanova;Sonia Quiñones-Úbeda;María Quintana-Aparicio;Miquel Aguilar

  • Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): Norms for the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure (Copy and Memory), and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test

    Jordi Peña-Casanova;Nina Gramunt-Fombuena;Sonia Quiñones-Úbeda;Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides

  • The Bayer-Activities of Daily Living Scale (B-ADL): Results from a Validation Study in Three European Countries

    Hellmut Erzigkeit;Hartmut Lehfeld;Jordi Peña-Casanova;Florian Bieber

  • Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): norms for Boston naming test and token test.

    Jordi Peña-Casanova;Sonia Quiñones-Úbeda;Nina Gramunt-Fombuena;Miquel Aguilar

  • Manual validation of FreeSurfer's automated hippocampal segmentation in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer Disease subjects

    Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides;Beatriz Gómez-Ansón;Aitor Sainz;Yolanda Vives

  • Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): norms for the Stroop color-word interference test and the Tower of London-Drexel.

    Jordi Peña-Casanova;Sonia Quiñones-Úbeda;Nina Gramunt-Fombuena;María Quintana

  • Semantic verbal fluency of animals: a normative and predictive study in a Spanish population.

    M.M. Benito-Cuadrado;S. Esteba-Castillo;P. Böhm;J. Cejudo-Bolívar

  • Ecological assessment of executive functions in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Ana Espinosa;Montserrat Alegret;Mercè Boada;Georgina Vinyes

  • Clinical validity and utility of the interview for deterioration of daily living in dementia for Spanish-speaking communities NORMACODEM Group.

    Peter Böhm;Jordi Peña-Casanova;Miquel Aguilar;Gonzalo Hernández

  • Estudios normativos españoles en población adulta joven (Proyecto NEURONORMA jóvenes), normas para las pruebas span verbal. span visuoespacial. Letter-Number Sequencing. Trail Making Test y Symbol Digit Modalities Test

    F. Tamayo;M. Casals-Coll;G. Sánchez-Benavides;M. Quintana

  • A new cognitive evaluation battery for Down syndrome and its relevance for clinical trials.

    Susana de Sola;Rafael de la Torre;Rafael de la Torre;Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides;Bessy Benejam

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled-trial of triflusal in mild cognitive impairment: the TRIMCI study.

    Teresa Gómez-Isla;Rafael Blesa;Merce Boada;Jordi Clarimón

  • [Shortened version of the Barcelona test (I): subtests and normal profiles].

    Peña-Casanova J;Guardia J;Bertran-Serra I;Manero Rm

  • Influence of age, sex, and education on the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery (VOSP) in a healthy normal elderly population.

    I Herrera-Guzmán;J Peña-Casanova;J P Lara;E Gudayol-Ferré

  • Cognitive performance in recreational ecstasy polydrug users: a two-year follow-up study

    S. de Sola LLopis;M. Miguelez-Pan;J. Peña-Casanova;S. Poudevida

  • [Spanish version of the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS): normative data and discriminant validity].

    Böhm P;Peña-Casanova J;Gramunt N;Manero Rm

Frequent Co-Authors

Magí Farré
Magí Farré Autonomous University of Barcelona
Rafael de la Torre
Rafael de la Torre Pompeu Fabra University
Herman Buschke
Herman Buschke Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Mara Dierssen
Mara Dierssen Centre for Genomic Regulation
Juan Domingo Gispert
Juan Domingo Gispert Pasqual Maragall Foundation
Antonio Verdejo-García
Antonio Verdejo-García Monash University
Rafael Oliva
Rafael Oliva University of Barcelona
Felicia A. Huppert
Felicia A. Huppert University of Sydney
Huub A. M. Middelkoop
Huub A. M. Middelkoop Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore a career in psychology, it’s important to understand the pathways open to graduates. Many students pursue online degrees in counseling, clinical psychology, or related fields to meet state licensure requirements and boost their qualifications.

Licensure is mandatory for those aiming to practice as professional counselors. However, the requirements vary by state. For example, the lpc licensure requirements in Iowa differ from the lpc license requirements in Kansas, highlighting the importance of research and planning no matter where you study.

Similarly, those interested in working in the Southeast should be aware of the lpc licensure requirements in Kentucky. Students considering the Gulf Coast region must look into the lpc licensure requirements in Louisiana to ensure their education aligns with local standards.

In summary, selecting the right online psychology degree can help you meet various licensing standards, open doors to careers in counseling, mental health, research, or academia, and allow you to make a real impact in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Jordi Peña-Casanova

Trending Scientists