World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Juan Domingo Gispert

Juan Domingo Gispert

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
11675
World Ranking
4517
National Ranking
65

Juan Domingo Gispert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Domingo Gispert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 496 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Juan Domingo Gispert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Domingo Gispert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juan Domingo Gispert is affiliated with the Pasqual Maragall Foundation in Spain. Their research primarily covers the field of Medicine with a specialized focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Neurology.

Their work concentrates on topics related to Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's Disease research and treatments, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging, and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments.

Frequent co-authors include:

  • José Luís Molinuevo
  • Marc Suárez-Calvet
  • Carolina Minguillón
  • Oriol Grau-Rivera
  • Kaj Blennow

Common publication venues for their work are:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Neurology
  • Brain Communications

Some recently published papers include:

  • "Differences Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Levels Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum", 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • "Novel tau biomarkers phosphorylated at T181, T217 or T231 rise in the initial stages of the preclinical Alzheimer's continuum when only subtle changes in Aβ pathology are detected", 2020, EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • "Plasma p-tau231 and p-tau217 as state markers of amyloid-β pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease", 2022, Nature Medicine
  • "APOE4 homozygosity represents a distinct genetic form of Alzheimer's disease", 2024, Nature Medicine
  • "Amyloid beta, tau, synaptic, neurodegeneration, and glial biomarkers in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer's continuum", 2020, Alzheimer s & Dementia

Best Publications

  • Differences Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Levels Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum.

    Andréa L Benedet;Andréa L Benedet;Marta Milà-Alomà;Agathe Vrillon;Agathe Vrillon;Nicholas J Ashton

  • sTREM2 cerebrospinal fluid levels are a potential biomarker for microglia activity in early‐stage Alzheimer's disease and associate with neuronal injury markers

    Marc Suárez-Calvet;Marc Suárez-Calvet;Gernot Kleinberger;Miguel Ángel Araque Caballero;Matthias Brendel

  • Plasma p-tau231 and p-tau217 as state markers of amyloid-β pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Global and regional gray matter reductions in ADHD: A voxel-based morphometric study

    S. Carmona;O. Vilarroya;A. Bielsa;V. Trèmols

  • Novel tau biomarkers phosphorylated at T181, T217 or T231 rise in the initial stages of the preclinical Alzheimer's continuum when only subtle changes in Aβ pathology are detected.

    Marc Suárez-Calvet;Thomas K Karikari;Nicholas J Ashton;Juan Lantero Rodríguez

  • The expression of GLP‐1 receptor mRNA and protein allows the effect of GLP‐1 on glucose metabolism in the human hypothalamus and brainstem

    Elvira Alvarez;M Dolores Martínez;Isabel Roncero;Julie A Chowen

  • APOE4 homozygosity represents a distinct genetic form of Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Amyloid beta, tau, synaptic, neurodegeneration, and glial biomarkers in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer's continuum

    Marta Milà-Alomà;Gemma Salvadó;Juan Domingo Gispert;Natalia Vilor-Tejedor

  • The ALFA project: A research platform to identify early pathophysiological features of Alzheimer's disease.

    José Luis Molinuevo;Nina Gramunt;Juan Domingo Gispert;Karine Fauria

  • Centiloid cut-off values for optimal agreement between PET and CSF core AD biomarkers

    Gemma Salvadó;José Luis Molinuevo;José Luis Molinuevo;Anna Brugulat-Serrat;Carles Falcon

  • Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans

    J.D Gispert;J Pascau;S Reig;R Martínez-Lázaro

  • Ventro-striatal reductions underpin symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Susanna Carmona;Erika Proal;Elseline A. Hoekzema;Juan-Domingo Gispert

  • Prevalence of sleep apnoea syndrome in the Spanish adult population.

    J M Marin;J M Gascon;S Carrizo;J Gispert

  • Randomized Phase III Trial of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation With or Without Hippocampal Avoidance for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (PREMER): A GICOR-GOECP-SEOR Study.

    Núria Rodríguez de Dios;Felipe Couñago;Mauricio Murcia-Mejía;Mikel Rico-Oses

  • Impact of urban environmental exposures on cognitive performance and brain structure of healthy individuals at risk for Alzheimer's dementia.

    Marta Crous-Bou;Mireia Gascon;Juan Domingo Gispert;Marta Cirach

  • Effects of APOE-ε4 allele load on brain morphology in a cohort of middle-aged healthy individuals with enriched genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease.

    Raffaele Cacciaglia;José Luis Molinuevo;Carles Falcón;Anna Brugulat-Serrat

  • CSF Synaptic Biomarkers in the Preclinical Stage of Alzheimer Disease and Their Association With MRI and PET: A Cross-sectional Study.

    Marta Milà-Alomà;Ann Brinkmalm;Ann Brinkmalm;Nicholas J Ashton;Hlin Kvartsberg;Hlin Kvartsberg

  • Cerebrospinal fluid sTREM2 levels are associated with gray matter volume increases and reduced diffusivity in early Alzheimer's disease

    Juan Domingo Gispert;Marc Suárez-Calvet;Marc Suárez-Calvet;Gemma C. Monté;Alan Tucholka

  • Spatial-Temporal Patterns of β-Amyloid Accumulation

    Unknown

  • Association Between Insomnia and Cognitive Performance, Gray Matter Volume, and White Matter Microstructure in Cognitively Unimpaired Adults

    Oriol Grau-Rivera;Grégory Operto;Carles Falcón;Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides

  • Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.

    Juan D. Gispert;Santiago Reig;Javier Pascau;Juan J. Vaquero

  • A Personalized Preclinical Model to Evaluate the Metastatic Potential of Patient-Derived Colon Cancer Initiating Cells

    Isabel Puig;Irene Chicote;Stephan Paul Tenbaum;Oriol Arques

  • Monitoring gene therapy by external imaging of mRNA: pilot study on murine erythropoietin.

    J Segura;C Fillat;D Andreu;J Llop

  • A whole-brain computational modeling approach to explain the alterations in resting-state functional connectivity during progression of Alzheimer's disease

    Murat Demirtaş;Carles Falcon;Alan Tucholka;Juan Domingo Gispert

  • In vivo evaluation of amyloid deposition and brain glucose metabolism of 5XFAD mice using positron emission tomography

    Santiago Rojas;José Raúl Herance;Juan Domingo Gispert;Sergio Abad

  • Brain and cognitive correlates of subjective cognitive decline-plus features in a population-based cohort

    Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides;Oriol Grau-Rivera;Marc Suárez-Calvet;Carolina Minguillon

Frequent Co-Authors

Carles Falcon
Carles Falcon HTC (Taiwan)
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Eider M. Arenaza-Urquijo
Eider M. Arenaza-Urquijo Barcelona Institute for Global Health
Manel Esteller
Manel Esteller Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute
Lorena Rami
Lorena Rami University of Barcelona
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Mark E. Schmidt
Mark E. Schmidt Janssen (Belgium)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of careers, including roles in counseling, psychology, and therapy. Many students choose to pursue further qualifications or specializations online to boost their skills and expand career options. Flexible online degrees make it easier to balance work, study, and personal commitments.

For those interested in school counseling, there are several cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited) to consider. These programs meet high educational standards while remaining affordable.

If you’re searching for the cheapest counseling degree online, you’ll find a range of accredited options providing a strong foundation in mental health support. Those looking to focus on families and relationships can explore marriage and family therapy degree online programs, which are designed to prepare graduates for professional licensure.

Additionally, pursuing an online masters in psychology can lead to careers in research, clinical work, and specialized therapeutic support. Carefully comparing program costs, accreditation, and curriculum can help you find the right fit for your career goals in the field of neuroscience and behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Juan Domingo Gispert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles