World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
122
Citations
55838
World Ranking
3473
National Ranking
130

Frans R.J. Verhey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans R.J. Verhey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 863 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frans R.J. Verhey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans R.J. Verhey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frans R.J. Verhey is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands, where they contribute to research predominantly in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, General Health Professions, Neurology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist has focused on several key topics within their research portfolio. These include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Frans R.J. Verhey has published extensively in various reputable venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Aging & Mental Health

Their recent papers demonstrate ongoing involvement in dementia and neurological studies, including the following contributions:

  • Global Prevalence of Young-Onset Dementia, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • Strategic infarct locations for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 12 acute ischaemic stroke cohorts, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • Pathophysiological subtypes of Alzheimer's disease based on cerebrospinal fluid proteomics, 2020, Brain
  • Increase in blood-brain barrier leakage in healthy, older adults, 2020, GeroScience
  • European intersocietal recommendations for the biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders, 2024, The Lancet Neurology

Throughout their career, Frans R.J. Verhey has collaborated with various frequent coauthors, which include:

  • Marjolein de Vugt
  • Pieter Jelle Visser
  • Inez H.G.B. Ramakers
  • Stephanie J. B. Vos
  • Sebastian Köhler

Their contribution to understanding neurocognitive disorders involves the integration of clinical data and biomarker diagnostics, neuroimaging, and molecular biological approaches. This multidisciplinary focus underpins their extensive work on dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • The Determinants of Quality of Life of Nursing Home Residents with Young-Onset Dementia and the Differences between Dementia Subtypes.

    Britt Appelhof;Christian Bakker;Jeannette C.L. Van Duinen-van den Ijssel;Sandra A. Zwijsen

  • A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD

    B. Winblad;K. Engedal;H. Soininen;F. Verhey

  • Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study

    Pieter Jelle Visser;Pieter Jelle Visser;Frans Verhey;Dirk L Knol;Philip Scheltens

  • Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as Screening Instruments for Depression in Stroke Patients

    Ivo Aben;Frans Verhey;Richel Lousberg;Jan Lodder

  • Proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer's disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

    Philippe Robert;C. U. Onyike;A. F. G. Leentjens;K. Dujardin

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease

    Harm J. van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Matthias J. P. van Osch

  • Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies

    Kay Deckers;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Olga J. G. Schiepers;Marjolein de Vugt

  • Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype

    Lisa Vermunt;Sietske A. M. Sikkes;Ardo van den Hout;Ron Handels

  • Depression and risk of mortality in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Fleur E. P. van Dooren;Giesje Nefs;Miranda T. Schram;Frans R. J. Verhey

  • Neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia: Results from the European Alzheimer disease Consortium: Part I

    Pauline Aalten;Frans R.J. Verhey;Marina Boziki;Roger Bullock

  • A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care

    E. Moniz-Cook;M. Vernooij-Dassen;R. Woods;F. R. Verhey

  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy predicts Alzheimer's disease in patients with minor cognitive impairment

    P J Visser;F R J Verhey;P A M Hofman;P Scheltens

  • A systematic review of Internet-based supportive interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia.

    L. M. M. Boots;M. E. de Vugt;R. J. M. van Knippenberg;G. I. J. M. Kempen

  • Higher incidence of depression preceding the onset of Parkinson's disease: A register study

    Albert F.G. Leentjens;Marjan Van den Akker;Job F.M. Metsemakers;Richel Lousberg

  • Assessment of cognition in Parkinson’s disease

    J. Marinus;M. Visser;N. A. Verwey;F. R.J. Verhey

  • Prevalence and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease at the mild cognitive impairment stage.

    Stephanie J B Vos;Frans Verhey;Lutz Frölich;Johannes Kornhuber

  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy and memory dysfunction as predictors for dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment

    Pieter Jelle Visser;Philip Scheltens;Frans R.J. Verhey;Ben Schmand

  • The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson's disease.

    Albert F. G. Leentjens;Frans R. J. Verhey;Richel Lousberg;Harro Spitsbergen

  • Efficacy of a medical food in mild Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, controlled trial

    Philip Scheltens;Patrick J.G.H. Kamphuis;Frans R.J. Verhey;Marcel G.M. Olde Rikkert

Frequent Co-Authors

Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Marjolein E. de Vugt
Marjolein E. de Vugt Maastricht University
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Pauline Aalten
Pauline Aalten Maastricht University
Magda Tsolaki
Magda Tsolaki Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University
Martin P.J. van Boxtel
Martin P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University
Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean pursuing a traditional MD. With the growth of online education, future healthcare professionals can consider diverse degree options aligned with their interests and career goals.

For those drawn to patient care, some nursing school without teas test programs offer flexible and accessible routes into nursing, removing barriers to entry. If you’re interested in the business and management side of healthcare, an accredited health administration degree can be completed online, opening doors to leadership roles in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses looking to advance can pursue asn to np bridge programs—these online options let RNs earn a master’s and become nurse practitioners without repeating undergraduate coursework.

Finally, for those passionate about wellness and preventive care, the best online nutrition programs provide a science-focused foundation for careers in nutrition, dietetics, research, or health education.

These alternative pathways can help you make a meaningful impact in healthcare, whether you’re seeking clinical work, administration, or a specialized field.

Best Scientists Citing Frans R.J. Verhey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles