World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
53
Citations
11193
World Ranking
3384
National Ranking
1

Ronald F. Woodman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald F. Woodman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ronald F. Woodman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald F. Woodman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1989 - Fellow, The World Academy of Sciences

Overview

Ronald F. Woodman is affiliated with the Instituto Geofísico del Perú in Peru. Their professional career is marked by engagement with scientific research within this institution, contributing to the body of knowledge in their field.

Woodman has been recognized with notable awards: in 1989, they became a Fellow of The World Academy of Sciences, and in 2007, they were inducted as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences.

The available data does not include specific papers, co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research associated with Woodman. Additionally, there is no record of book publications authored by Woodman based on the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Radar observations of F region equatorial irregularities

    Ronald F. Woodman;César La Hoz

  • Average vertical and zonal F region plasma drifts over Jicamarca

    Bela G. Fejer;E. R. de Paula;S. Gonzalez;R. F. Woodman

  • Vertical drift velocities and east‐west electric fields at the magnetic equator

    Ronald F. Woodman

  • Radar Observations of Winds and Turbulence in the Stratosphere and Mesosphere.

    Ronald F. Woodman;Alberto Guillen

  • Equatorial spread F: Implications of VHF radar observations

    D. T. Farley;B. B. Balsey;R. F. Woodman;J. P. McClure

  • Dependence of equatorial F region vertical drifts on season and solar cycle

    Bela G. Fejer;D. T. Farley;R. F. Woodman;C. A. Calderon

  • Mid-latitude E region field-aligned irregularities observed with the MU radar

    Mamoru Yamamoto;Shoichiro Fukao;Ronald F. Woodman;Tadahiko Ogawa

  • Equatorial electric fields during magnetically disturbed conditions 2. Implications of simultaneous auroral and equatorial measurements

    C. A. Gonzales;M. C. Kelley;Bela G. Fejer;J. F. Vickrey

  • An empirical model of quiet-day ionospheric electric fields at middle and low latitudes

    A. D. Richmond;M. Blanc;B. A. Emery;R. H. Wand

  • Equatorial electric fields during magnetically disturbed conditions 1. The effect of the interplanetary magnetic field

    Bela G. Fejer;C. A. Gonzales;D. T. Farley;M. C. Kelley

  • Gravity wave modulation of gradient drift instabilities in mid-latitude sporadic E irregularities

    R. F. Woodman;M. Yamamoto;S. Fukao

  • Aspect sensitivity measurements of VHF backscatter made with the Chung‐Li radar: Plausible mechanisms

    Ronald F. Woodman;Yen‐Hsyang ‐H Chu

  • Vertical structure of the VHF backscattering region in the equatorial electrojet and the gradient drift instability

    Bela G. Fejer;D. T. Farley;B. B. Balsley;R. F. Woodman

  • Spread F – an old equatorial aeronomy problem finally resolved?

    R. F. Woodman

  • Spectral moment estimation in MST radars

    Ronald F. Woodman

  • Methods for the measurement of vertical ionospheric motions near the magnetic equator by incoherent scattering

    R. F. Woodman;T. Hagfors

  • Fine Altitude Resolution Observations of Stratospheric Turbulent Layers by the Arecibo 430 MHz Radar

    Toru Sato;Ronald F. Woodman

  • Seeding and layering of equatorial spread F by gravity waves

    D. L. Hysell;M. C. Kelley;W. E. Swartz;R. F. Woodman

  • East-west ionospheric drifts at the magnetic equator.

    R. F. Woodman

  • A new approach in incoherent scatter F region E × B drift measurements at Jicamarca

    Erhan Kudeki;Santanu Bhattacharyya;Ronald F. Woodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge L. Chau
Jorge L. Chau University of Rostock
Bela G. Fejer
Bela G. Fejer Utah State University
Susumu Kato
Susumu Kato Kyoto University
Shoichiro Fukao
Shoichiro Fukao Kyoto University
Erhan Kudeki
Erhan Kudeki University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mamoru Yamamoto
Mamoru Yamamoto Kyoto University
Donald T. Farley
Donald T. Farley Cornell University
Ben B. Balsley
Ben B. Balsley University of Colorado Boulder
Michael C. Kelley
Michael C. Kelley Cornell University
Toshitaka Tsuda
Toshitaka Tsuda Kyoto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. For example, those keen on information management may consider enrolling in online mlis programs accredited ala. These programs ensure quality education and better career prospects in library and information science.

Many wonder, is a masters in library science worth it? Given the growing importance of data curation and information organization in scientific research, this degree is increasingly valuable in various industries, including environmental organizations.

Creatively inclined students might explore visual documentation fields through an online degree in photography. This is especially relevant for capturing environmental and geological phenomena, combining artistic skill with scientific communication.

Additionally, veterans interested in transitioning to civilian careers can benefit from specialized programs like those detailed in photography degree online for veterans, which cater to their unique needs and experiences. These tailored opportunities provide flexible learning and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald F. Woodman

Trending Scientists