World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
5255
World Ranking
9132
National Ranking
3281

Erhan Kudeki publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erhan Kudeki sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erhan Kudeki D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erhan Kudeki sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erhan Kudeki is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within physics, astronomy, and engineering, with a particular focus on the dynamics of the ionosphere and magnetosphere as well as quantum mechanics and related applications.

The main fields of study associated with Kudeki include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Engineering

The subfields covered in their work include:

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Geophysics
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Kudeki's research topics reveal a diverse scope, encompassing:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Mechanical and Optical Resonators
  • GNSS positioning and interference
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Quantum many-body systems

They have published in several scientific journals, with frequent venues including:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Physical review. A/Physical review, A

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Kudeki are:

  • Quantum Maxwell's Equations Made Simple: Employing Scalar and Vector Potential Formulation, 2020, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine
  • VIPIR and 50 MHz Radar Studies of Gravity Wave Signatures in 150-km Echoes Observed at Jicamarca, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Dual Sounding Rocket and C/NOFS Satellite Observations of DC Electric Fields and Plasma Density in the Equatorial E- and F-Region Ionosphere at Sunset, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Solved and unsolved riddles about low-latitude daytime valley region plasma waves and 150-km echoes, 2023, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Fourier Transform, Dirac Commutator, Energy Conservation, and Correspondence Principle for Electrical Engineers, 2022, IEEE journal on multiscale and multiphysics computational techniques

Kudeki has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Weng Cho Chew
  • Dong-Yeop Na
  • Christopher J. Ryu
  • Pablo Reyes
  • Thomas E. Roth

Best Publications

  • Estimating daytime vertical ExB drift velocities in the equatorial F-region using ground-based magnetometer observations

    David Anderson;Adela Anghel;Kiyohumi Yumoto;Mutsumi Ishitsuka

  • Scintillations, plasma drifts, and neutral winds in the equatorial ionosphere after sunset

    S. Basu;E. Kudeki;Su. Basu;C. E. Valladares

  • Postsunset vortex in equatorial F-region plasma drifts and implications for bottomside spread-F

    Erhan Kudeki;Santanu Bhattacharyya

  • Collisional shear instability in the equatorial F region ionosphere

    D. L. Hysell;Erhan Kudeki

  • Interferometer studies of equatorial F region irregularities and drifts

    E. Kudeki;Bela G. Fejer;D. T. Farley;H. M. Ierkic

  • GPS phase fluctuations in the equatorial region during the MISETA 1994 campaign

    J. Aarons;M. Mendillo;R. Yantosca;E. Kudeki

  • Equatorial F region zonal plasma drifts

    Bela G. Fejer;E. Kudeki;D. T. Farley

  • Equatorial spread-F initiation: Post-sunset vortex, thermospheric winds, gravity waves

    Erhan Kudeki;Ahmed Akgiray;Marco Milla;Jorge L. Chau

  • High resolution observations of 150 km echoes at Jicamarca

    Erhan Kudeki;Clinton D. Fawcett

  • A new approach in incoherent scatter F region E × B drift measurements at Jicamarca

    Erhan Kudeki;Santanu Bhattacharyya;Ronald F. Woodman

  • Long wavelength irregularities in the equatorial electrojet

    Erhan Kudeki;Donald T. Farley;Bela G. Fejer

  • Electric field and plasma density measurements in the strongly driven daytime equatorial electrojet: 2. Two‐stream waves

    R. F. Pfaff;M. C. Kelley;E. Kudeki;Bela G. Fejer

  • Electric field and plasma density measurements in the strongly driven daytime equatorial electrojet: 1. The unstable layer and gradient drift waves

    R. F. Pfaff;M. C. Kelley;E. Kudeki;Bela G. Fejer

  • Radar interferometric imaging of field‐aligned plasma irregularities in the equatorial electrojet

    Erhan Kudeki;Fahri Sürücü

  • Frequency domain interferometry: A high resolution radar technique for studies of atmospheric turbulence

    Erhan Kudeki;Gary R. Stitt

  • Electric field and plasma density measurements in the auroral electrojet

    R. Pfaff;M. C. Kelley;Bela G. Fejer;E. Kudeki

  • The Condor Equatorial Spread F Campaign: Overview and results of the large‐scale measurements

    M. C. Kelley;J. LaBelle;E. Kudeki;B. G. Fejer

  • Aspect sensitivity of equatorial electrojet irregularities and theoretical implications

    Erhan Kudeki;Donald T. Farley

  • Radar interferometric imaging studies of long‐duration meteor echoes observed at Jicamarca

    Elaine Chapin;Erhan Kudeki

  • Plasma wave excitation on meteor trails in the equatorial electrojet

    Elaine Chapin;Erhan Kudeki

  • The Condor equatorial electrojet campaign: radar results

    Erhan Kudeki;Bela G. Fejer;Donald T. Farley;Christian Hanuise

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge L. Chau
Jorge L. Chau University of Rostock
Michael C. Kelley
Michael C. Kelley Cornell University
Steven J Franke
Steven J Franke University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael P. Sulzer
Michael P. Sulzer Arecibo Observatory
Bela G. Fejer
Bela G. Fejer Utah State University
Ronald F. Woodman
Ronald F. Woodman Instituto Geofísico del Perú
Miguel F. Larsen
Miguel F. Larsen Clemson University
Donald T. Farley
Donald T. Farley Cornell University
David L. Hysell
David L. Hysell Cornell University
David C. Fritts
David C. Fritts G & A Technical Software (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a diverse range of related fields and career opportunities. For those interested in spatial data and mapping technologies, exploring the best GIS graduate programs can be a valuable step. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) specialists play a critical role in environmental planning and resource management.

Public administration is another complementary area, especially for students looking to influence environmental policy and community planning. Many professionals advance their careers through top online MPA programs, which equip graduates with leadership and management skills tailored to public sector challenges.

Understanding societal behaviors and structures is crucial in addressing environmental issues, making online sociology degrees highly relevant. Prospective students can find flexible options through online bachelors degree programs in sociology, which provide insights into human-environment interactions.

For educators and professionals seeking advanced qualifications without extensive research commitments, online EdD programs no dissertation offer practical leadership-oriented education. This pathway is ideal for environmental educators aiming to enhance their instructional impact.

Best Scientists Citing Erhan Kudeki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles