World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
6893
World Ranking
5895
National Ranking
2139

Steven J Franke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J Franke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Steven J Franke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J Franke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven J Franke is a researcher affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their work is situated primarily within the domain of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a specific focus on Atmospheric Science as a subfield. Their research contributions extend into several related areas including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, and Geophysics.

The scientist's main research topics include Cryospheric studies and observations, Climate change and permafrost, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Winter Sports Injuries and Performance, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Landslides and related hazards, and Polar Research and Ecology.

Frequent collaboration with other researchers is a feature of their work. Their notable co-authors include Daniela Jansen, Olaf Eisen, John Paden, Daniel Steinhage, and Veit Helm. These partnerships have produced a significant body of research distributed across multiple prominent venues.

Publications by Steven J Franke have appeared repeatedly in several scientific journals and conferences. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • The Cryosphere
  • Annals of Glaciology
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Glaciology
  • Nature Communications

A selection of recent papers authored or co-authored by Steven J Franke includes:

  • Upstream flow effects revealed in the EastGRIP ice core using Monte Carlo inversion of a two-dimensional ice-flow model, 2021, The Cryosphere
  • Bed topography and subglacial landforms in the onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, 2020, Annals of Glaciology
  • A stratigraphy-based method for reconstructing ice core orientation, 2020, Annals of Glaciology
  • Complex Basal Conditions and Their Influence on Ice Flow at the Onset of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Airborne ultra-wideband radar sounding over the shear margins and along flow lines at the onset region of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, 2022, Earth System Science Data

Best Publications

  • Empirical wind model for the upper, middle and lower atmosphere

    A.E. Hedin;E.L. Fleming;A.H. Manson;F.J. Schmidlin

  • Ionospheric imaging using computerized tomography

    Jeffrey R. Austen;Steven J. Franke;C. H. Liu

  • Application of computerized tomography to the investigation of ionospheric structures

    T. D. Raymund;J. R. Austen;S. J. Franke;C. H. Liu

  • Seasonal and quasi-biennial variations in the migrating diurnal tide observed by Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere, Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED)

    Jiyao Xu;A. K. Smith;H.‐L. Liu;W. Yuan

  • Gravity wave models for the horizontal wave number spectra of atmospheric velocity and density fluctuations

    Chester S. Gardner;Chris A. Hostetler;Steven J. Franke

  • Wave breaking signatures in OH airglow and sodium densities and temperatures: 1. Airglow imaging, Na lidar, and MF radar observations

    J. H. Hecht;R. L. Walterscheid;D. C. Fritts;J. R. Isler

  • Validation of mesosphere and lower thermosphere winds from the high resolution Doppler imager on UARS

    M. D. Burrage;W. R. Skinner;D. A. Gell;P. B. Hays

  • An investigation of motions of the equatorial anomaly crest

    K. C. Yeh;S. J. Franke;E. S. Andreeva;V. E. Kunitsyn

  • Climatology and modeling of quasi-monochromatic atmospheric gravity waves observed over Urbana Illinois

    J. H. Hecht;R. L. Walterscheid;Michael P. Hickey Ph.D.;S. J. Franke

  • Seasonal variations of the semi-diurnal and diurnal tides in the MLT: multi-year MF radar observations from 2 to 70°N, and the GSWM tidal model

    Alan Manson;Chris Meek;Maura Hagan;Chris Hall

  • Observations of the 5-day wave in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere

    Dennis M. Riggin;Han Li Liu;Ruth S. Lieberman;Raymond G. Roble

  • Ionospheric tomography: its limitations and reconstruction methods

    T.D. Raymond;S.J. Franke;K.C. Yeh

  • Comparison of meteor radar and Na Doppler lidar measurements of winds in the mesopause region above Maui, Hawaii

    S. J. Franke;X. Chu;A. Z. Liu;W. K. Hocking

  • Two‐day wave coupling of the low‐latitude atmosphere‐ionosphere system

    D. V. Pancheva;P. J. Mukhtarov;M. G. Shepherd;N. J. Mitchell

  • Characteristics of short‐period wavelike features near 87 km altitude from airglow and lidar observations over Maui

    James H. Hecht;A. Z. Liu;Richard L. Walterscheid;Steven J Franke

  • Some features of the equatorial anomaly revealed by ionospheric tomography

    E. S. Andreeva;Steven J Franke;K. C. Yeh;V. E. Kunitsyn

  • Global study of northern hemisphere quasi-2-day wave events in recent summers near 90 km altitude

    C. E. Meek;A. H. Manson;Steven J Franke;W. Singer

  • TIMED Doppler interferometer (TIDI) observations of migrating diurnal and semidiurnal tides

    Qian Wu;Qian Wu;T.L. Killeen;D.A. Ortland;S.C. Solomon

  • The 6.5‐day wave in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere: Evidence for baroclinic/barotropic instability

    R. S. Lieberman;D. M. Riggin;S. J. Franke;A. H. Manson

  • Na Doppler/temperature lidar: Initial mesopause region observations and comparison with the Urbana medium frequency radar

    Richard E. Bills;Chester S. Gardner;Steven J. Franke

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Vincent
Robert A. Vincent University of Adelaide
A. H. Manson
A. H. Manson University of Saskatchewan
C. E. Meek
C. E. Meek University of Saskatchewan
Alan Z. Liu
Alan Z. Liu Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University
Erhan Kudeki
Erhan Kudeki University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael J. Taylor
Michael J. Taylor Utah State University
Douglas L. Jones
Douglas L. Jones University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John MacDougall
John MacDougall University of Western Ontario
Toshitaka Tsuda
Toshitaka Tsuda Kyoto University
Wayne K. Hocking
Wayne K. Hocking University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several related online degrees offer valuable perspectives. Pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors is an excellent option. It provides insight into human behavior and social systems, which is crucial for addressing environmental issues influenced by societal dynamics.

Professionals aiming to advance in education often explore accredited options such as accredited eds to edd programs. These pathways enable environmental educators and administrators to enhance their leadership and research skills efficiently and flexibly.

For those seeking doctoral degrees without the traditional hurdles, some doctoral programs online no dissertation offer an accelerated path by focusing on practical applications instead of lengthy dissertations.

Finally, affordable advanced degrees such as the cheapest online dsw programs provide opportunities to specialize in social work, complementing environmental careers that address community resilience and support.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J Franke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles