World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
10174
World Ranking
7982
National Ranking
3426

Cindee Madison publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindee Madison sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 89 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Cindee Madison D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cindee Madison sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cindee Madison is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley, United States. Their recent research work is documented through multiple papers primarily published in the platform Zenodo, hosted by CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, alongside a publication in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) by La Trobe University.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "nipy/nibabel: 3.2.1" (2020), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "nipy/nipype: 1.5.1" (2020), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "nipy/nipype: 1.4.2" (2020), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "nipy/nibabel: 3.1.1" (2020), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "nipy/nibabel: 3.0.1" (2020), OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Their work features collaboration with a consistent group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Christopher J. Markiewicz
  • Michael Hanke
  • Yaroslav O. Halchenko
  • Demián Wassermann
  • Mathias Goncalves

Publication venues primarily consist of:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

The scientific contributions revolve around software tools related to neuroimaging data management and processing, as reflected by the specific project titles "nibabel" and "nipype," which are established components in neuroimaging informatics.

Cindee Madison's publication record indicates sustained engagement with open-source scientific software dissemination, emphasizing the distribution of software versions through publicly accessible repositories.

Best Publications

  • Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python

    Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski;Christopher D. Burns;Cindee M. Madison;Dav Clark

  • Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI

    Susan M. Landau;Danielle J Harvey;Cindee M. Madison;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated -amyloid deposition in elderly subjects

    E. C. Mormino;J. T. Kluth;C. M. Madison;G. D. Rabinovici;G. D. Rabinovici;G. D. Rabinovici

  • Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairment

    S. M. Landau;Danielle J Harvey;C. M. Madison;E. M. Reiman

  • Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation

    Sylvia Villeneuve;Gil D. Rabinovici;Gil D. Rabinovici;Gil D. Rabinovici;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy;Cindee Madison

  • Relationships between Beta-Amyloid and Functional Connectivity in Different Components of the Default Mode Network in Aging

    Elizabeth C. Mormino;Andre Smiljic;Amynta O. Hayenga;Susan H. Onami

  • Subjective cognition and amyloid deposition imaging: a Pittsburgh Compound B positron emission tomography study in normal elderly individuals.

    Audrey Perrotin;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Cindee M. Madison;Amynta O. Hayenga

  • Diverging patterns of amyloid deposition and hypometabolism in clinical variants of probable Alzheimer’s disease

    Manja Lehmann;Manja Lehmann;Manja Lehmann;Pia M. Ghosh;Pia M. Ghosh;Cindee Madison;Robert Laforce;Robert Laforce

  • Neural compensation in older people with brain amyloid-β deposition.

    Jeremy A Elman;Hwamee Oh;Cindee M Madison;Suzanne L Baker

  • Brain atrophy associated with baseline and longitudinal measures of cognition.

    V. A. Cardenas;V. A. Cardenas;L. L. Chao;L. L. Chao;C. Studholme;C. Studholme;K. Yaffe;K. Yaffe

  • Associations between Alzheimer disease biomarkers, neurodegeneration, and cognition in cognitively normal older people.

    Miranka Wirth;Sylvia Villeneuve;Claudia M. Haase;Cindee M. Madison

  • Alzheimer's Disease Neurodegenerative Biomarkers Are Associated with Decreased Cognitive Function but Not β-Amyloid in Cognitively Normal Older Individuals

    Miranka Wirth;Cindee M Madison;Gil D Rabinovici;Gil D Rabinovici;Gil D Rabinovici;Hwamee Oh

  • Not quite PIB-positive, not quite PIB-negative: slight PIB elevations in elderly normal control subjects are biologically relevant.

    Elizabeth C. Mormino;Michael G. Brandel;Cindee M. Madison;Gil D. Rabinovici;Gil D. Rabinovici

  • Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness.

    Gordon E. Legge;Cindee Madison;Brenna N. Vaughn;Allen M. Y. Cheong

  • Aβ Deposition in Aging Is Associated with Increases in Brain Activation during Successful Memory Encoding

    Elizabeth C. Mormino;Michael G. Brandel;Cindee M. Madison;Shawn Marks

  • Cerebrovascular disease, beta-amyloid and cognition in aging

    Natalie L. Marchant;Natalie L. Marchant;Bruce R. Reed;Charles S. DeCarli;Cindee M. Madison

  • The aging brain and cognition: contribution of vascular injury and aβ to mild cognitive dysfunction

    Natalie L. Marchant;Bruce R. Reed;Nerses Sanossian;Cindee M. Madison

  • Intrinsic connectivity networks in healthy subjects explain clinical variability in Alzheimer’s disease

    Manja Lehmann;Manja Lehmann;Manja Lehmann;Cindee M. Madison;Pia M. Ghosh;Pia M. Ghosh;William W. Seeley

  • Effects of Beta-Amyloid on Resting State Functional Connectivity Within and Between Networks Reflect Known Patterns of Regional Vulnerability

    Jeremy A. Elman;Cindee M. Madison;Suzanne L. Baker;Jacob W. Vogel

  • Distinct clinical and metabolic deficits in PCA and AD are not related to amyloid distribution

    M.H. Rosenbloom;A. Alkalay;N. Agarwal;S.L. Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Susan M. Landau
Susan M. Landau University of California, Berkeley
Suzanne L. Baker
Suzanne L. Baker Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Elizabeth C. Mormino
Elizabeth C. Mormino Stanford University
William W. Seeley
William W. Seeley University of California, San Francisco
Bruce R Reed
Bruce R Reed University of California, Davis
Michael W. Weiner
Michael W. Weiner University of California, San Francisco
Miranka Wirth
Miranka Wirth German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cindee Madison

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles