World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
13957
World Ranking
4654
National Ranking
2096

Kevin S. Lee publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin S. Lee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 141 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kevin S. Lee D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin S. Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin S. Lee is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Engineering and Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on several subfields including Organic Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Lignin and Wood Chemistry
  • Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
  • Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments

Kevin S. Lee has contributed to a variety of peer-reviewed publications in several scientific journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • Efficient lignin depolymerization by continuous flow microreactor-assisted electrochemical advanced oxidation in water/co-solvent system, 2023, published in Green Chemistry
  • Use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation along with functional tasks for immediate pain relief in individuals with knee osteoarthritis, 2021, published in European Journal of Pain
  • Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity and Surface Exsolution in PrOx-Substituted Cerium Gadolinium Oxide, 2022, published in ACS Applied Energy Materials
  • [3+2] Cycloaddition of Nitrile Imines with 3-Benzylidene Succinimides: A Facile Access to Functionalized Spiropyrazolines, 2022, published in Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • A super-resolution coded aperture miniature mass spectrometer proof-of-concept for planetary science, 2024, published in International Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kevin S. Lee include Pawan Kumar Dubey, Junsung Hong, Tanouir Aloui, Rafael Bento Serpa, and D. K. Ross. These repeated collaborations indicate ongoing joint research efforts across various projects.

The recurring publication venues where their research appears are:

  • Green Chemistry
  • European Journal of Pain
  • ACS Applied Energy Materials
  • Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • International Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Best Publications

  • Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels

    Antoine Louveau;Igor Smirnov;Timothy J. Keyes;Jacob D. Eccles

  • Unexpected role of interferon-γ in regulating neuronal connectivity and social behaviour

    Anthony J. Filiano;Yang Xu;Nicholas J. Tustison;Rachel L. Marsh

  • Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: putative role of inflammation.

    Aaron S Dumont;Randall J Dumont;Michael M Chow;Chi-Lung Lin

  • Inhibition of proteolysis protects hippocampal neurons from ischemia.

    Kevin S. Lee;Sherry Frank;Pete Vanderklish;Amy Arai

  • Ischemia triggers NMDA receptor-linked cytoskeletal proteolysis in hippocampus

    Peter Seubert;Kevin Lee;Gary Lynch

  • Neuroprotection with a calpain inhibitor in a model of focal cerebral ischemia.

    Seung Chyul Hong;Yasunobu Goto;Giuseppe Lanzino;Scott Soleau

  • The anticonvulsive action of adenosine: a postsynaptic, dendritic action by a possible endogenous anticonvulsant.

    Kevin S. Lee;Peter Schubert;Uwe Heinemann

  • Detection of soluble E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and L-selectin in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Richard S. Polin;Murad Bavbek;Mark E. Shaffrey;Kevin Billups

  • Stimulation-dependent release of 3H-adenosine derivatives from central axon terminals to target neurones.

    Peter Schubert;Kevin Lee;Mark West;Sam Deadwyler

  • Mild postischemic hypothermia limits cerebral injury following transient focal ischemia in rat neocortex.

    Hiroji Yanamoto;Seung-Chyul Hong;Scott Soleau;Neal F. Kassell

  • An A1-adenosine receptor, characterized by [3H]cyclohexyladenosine binding, mediates the depression of evoked potentials in a rat hippocampal slice preparation

    Martin Reddington;Kevin S. Lee;P. Schubert

  • Intraischemic hypothermia attenuates neutrophil infiltration in the rat neocortex after focal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

    Tomikatsu Toyoda;Satoshi Suzuki;Neal F. Kassell;Kevin S. Lee

  • Effects of Intraischemic Hypothermia on Cerebral Damage in a Model of Reversible Focal Ischemia

    Yasunobu Goto;Neal F. Kassell;Ken-ichiro Hiramatsu;Scott W. Soleau

  • Ischemic tolerance in the rat neocortex following hypothermic preconditioning

    Shinsaku Nishio;Masatoshi Yunoki;Zong-Fu Chen;Matthew J. Anzivino

  • Histological changes in the normal rat brain after gamma irradiation.

    T. Kamiryo;N. F. Kassell;Q. A. Thai;M. B. S. Lopes

  • A Genetic Animal Model of Human Neocortical Heterotopia Associated with Seizures

    Kevin S. Lee;Frank Schottler;Jennifer L. Collins;Giuseppe Lanzino

  • Regulation of cerebral microvessels by glutamatergic mechanisms.

    Andrea Fergus;Kevin S Lee

  • GABAERGIC REGULATION OF CEREBRAL MICROVASCULAR TONE IN THE RAT

    Andrea Fergus;Kevin S. Lee

  • Reversal of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-induced Vasoconstriction with an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist

    Patricia L. Foley;Hakan H. Caner;Neal F. Kassell;Kevin S. Lee

  • Induction of ischemic tolerance and antioxidant activity by brief focal ischemia.

    Toyoda T;Kassell Nf;Lee Ks

  • Calpain inhibitors improve the recovery of synaptic transmission from hypoxia in hippocampal slices.

    Amy Arai;Markus Kessler;Kevin Lee;Gary Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Neal F. Kassell
Neal F. Kassell Focused Ultrasound Foundation
Edward H. Bertram
Edward H. Bertram University of Virginia
Max Wintermark
Max Wintermark Stanford University
Aaron S. Dumont
Aaron S. Dumont Tulane University
Jonathan Kipnis
Jonathan Kipnis Washington University in St. Louis
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh
Alexander L. Klibanov
Alexander L. Klibanov University of Virginia
Jaideep Kapur
Jaideep Kapur University of Virginia
Paul S. Buckmaster
Paul S. Buckmaster Stanford University
Amy Arai
Amy Arai Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields that complement their understanding of the brain, behavior, and human well-being. Careers such as therapist, counselor, psychologist, or social worker are natural pathways combining knowledge from both neuroscience and behavioral sciences.

Many students start with a bachelor of psychology online to build foundational knowledge in human behavior, mental processes, and research methods. This degree can serve as a gateway into a variety of graduate studies or entry-level mental health roles.

Those interested in continuing their education may look into affordable online masters in psychology, which can prepare them for advanced career opportunities in research, health care, or clinical practice.

For students passionate about helping families and individuals in a therapeutic setting, marriage and family therapy master's programs provide the specialized skills needed for licensure and clinical roles.

Alternatively, a career in social work is well-supported by accessible options such as the easiest msw online program, allowing graduates to advocate for communities using principles that sometimes overlap with neuroscience.

By pursuing these related degrees, neuroscience students can expand their professional horizons and contribute meaningfully to mental health, wellness, and research sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin S. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles