World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 146 1349 1247 785 714 572 66082

Gary Lynch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary Lynch between 1967 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary Lynch published across 60 years, from 1967 to 2026, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 1990. 6 of the 630 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 1990. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 2 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 16 publications 1974: 13 publications 1975: 13 publications 1976: 16 publications 1977: 10 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 26 publications 1980: 14 publications 1981: 19 publications 1982: 13 publications 1983: 15 publications 1984: 15 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 18 publications 1989: 20 publications 1990: 27 publications 1991: 24 publications 1992: 18 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1967 2026

630 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary Lynch: publications per year, 1967 to 2026
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 2
1969 2
1970 2
1971 5
1972 5
1973 16
1974 13
1975 13
1976 16
1977 10
1978 10
1979 26
1980 14
1981 19
1982 13
1983 15
1984 15
1985 9
1986 12
1987 13
1988 18
1989 20
1990 27
1991 24
1992 18
1993 13
1994 11
1995 14
1996 13
1997 12
1998 20
1999 6
2000 11
2001 6
2002 15
2003 12
2004 8
2005 11
2006 6
2007 9
2008 4
2009 10
2010 11
2011 7
2012 6
2013 9
2014 11
2015 6
2016 8
2017 8
2018 10
2019 6
2020 3
2021 6
2022 6
2023 1
2024 7
2025 5
2026 1
Total 630
Download as CSV

Gary Lynch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Lynch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 572 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 572
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gary Lynch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Lynch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 146–147 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 146 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106 146
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gary Lynch is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and molecular biology. Additional interests extend into social psychology and education.

The primary fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Neuroscience

More specifically, subfields in which they have contributed are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education

Their work covers a broad array of topics such as:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Gary Lynch has contributed to various academic publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Nature Neuroscience

Notable recent papers include:

  • Increased excitatory to inhibitory synaptic ratio in parietal cortex samples from individuals with Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Sex differences in synaptic plasticity underlying learning, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Prepubescent female rodents have enhanced hippocampal LTP and learning relative to males, reversing in adulthood as inhibition increases, 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • Rapid Aging in the Perforant Path Projections to the Rodent Dentate Gyrus, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Persistent sexually dimorphic effects of adolescent THC exposure on hippocampal synaptic plasticity and episodic memory in rodents, 2021, Neurobiology of Disease

Collaborations form a significant part of their research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Christine M. Gall
  • Aliza A. Le
  • Julie C. Lauterborn
  • Conor D. Cox
  • Yousheng Jia

Best Publications

  • Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N -methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5

    R. G. M. Morris;E. Anderson;G. S. Lynch;M. Baudry

  • The Biochemistry of Memory: A New and Specific Hypothesis.

    Gary Lynch;Michael Baudry

  • Patterned stimulation at the theta frequency is optimal for the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation.

    John R. Larson;Darryl Wong;Gary Lynch

  • Heterosynaptic depression: a postsynaptic correlate of long-term potentiation

    G. S. Lynch;T. Dunwiddie;V. Gribkoff

  • A glycine site associated with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors: characterization and identification of a new class of antagonists.

    M. Kessler;T. Terramani;G. Lynch;M. Baudry

  • Induction of synaptic potentiation in hippocampus by patterned stimulation involves two events.

    John Larson;Gary Lynch

  • Hippocampal aging and adrenocorticoids: quantitative correlations

    P. W. Landfield;Jack C Waymire;G. Lynch

  • Contributions of Quisqualate and NMDA Receptors to the Induction and Expression of LTP

    Dominique Muller;Michel Joly;Gary Lynch

  • Induced acetylcholinesterase-rich layer in rat dentate gyrus following entorhinal lesions.

    Gary Lynch;Dee Ann Matthews;Sarah Mosko;Thomas Parks

  • An electron microscopic study of lesion-induced synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. I. Magnitude and time course of degeneration

    Dee Ann Matthews;Carl Cotman;Gary Lynch

  • Mechanisms of Late-Onset Cognitive Decline after Early-Life Stress

    Kristen L. Brunson;Enikö Kramár;Bin Lin;Yuncai Chen

  • The distribution of septal projections to the hippocampus of the rat

    Sarah Mosko;Gary Lynch;Carl W. Cotman

  • An electron microscopic study of lesion-induced synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. II. Reappearance of morphologically normal synaptic contacts.

    Dee Ann Matthews;Carl Cotman;Gary Lynch

  • Paired-pulse and frequency facilitation in the CA1 region of the in vitro rat hippocampus.

    Robert Creager;Thomas Dunwiddie;Gary Lynch

  • A quantitative electron microscopic study of synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the rat

    Barbara Crain;Carl Cotman;Dwan Taylor;Gary Lynch

  • Hippocampal Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairments Provoked by Chronic Early-Life Stress Involve Excessive Activation of CRH Receptors

    Autumn S. Ivy;Christopher S. Rex;Yuncai Chen;Céline Dubé

  • Stable hippocampal long-term potentiation elicited by 'theta' pattern stimulation.

    Ursula Staubli;Gary Lynch

  • Facilitation of glutamate receptors enhances memory.

    Ursula Staubli;Gary Rogers;Gary Lynch

  • Stable depression of potentiated synaptic responses in the hippocampus with 1-5 Hz stimulation.

    Ursula Staubli;Gary Lynch

  • Impaired synaptic potentiation processes in the hippocampus of aged, memory-deficient rats.

    Philip W. Landfield;James L. McGaugh;Gary Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine M. Gall
Christine M. Gall University of California, Irvine
Michel Baudry
Michel Baudry Western University of Health Sciences
Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine
Amy Arai
Amy Arai Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
John Larson
John Larson University of Illinois at Chicago
Enikö A. Kramár
Enikö A. Kramár University of California, Irvine
Ursula Staubli
Ursula Staubli New York University
Julie C. Lauterborn
Julie C. Lauterborn University of California, Irvine
Xiaoning Bi
Xiaoning Bi College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Laura Lee Colgin
Laura Lee Colgin The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA means considering a variety of online degrees and fast-tracked career options beyond traditional MD programs. Many nursing professionals are pursuing flexible study formats while continuing to work. For instance, there are options like the rn to bsn online without clinicals that allow registered nurses to advance their credentials without the need for additional in-person requirements.

For advanced practice nurses, demand is high for graduate-level programs that balance convenience and rigor. Many turn to dnp online programs and dnp programs online, popular for being both accelerated and accommodating for working professionals. These degrees help nurses transition to leadership roles, nurse practitioner positions, or clinical researcher paths.

Entry-level roles in nursing are also evolving, with accelerated study options more widely available. Programs such as the accelerated lpn program support students in launching new health care careers sooner, thanks to condensed coursework and online learning models.

Whether you’re looking for advancement or a fast entry into the workforce, these online pathways provide flexible solutions for aspiring health professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Lynch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles