World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8573 7922 3648 3303 69 5617

Amy Arai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy Arai between 1984 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy Arai published across 37 years, from 1984 to 2020, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1990. 1 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1990. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1984 2020

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy Arai: publications per year, 1984 to 2020
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 7
1991 3
1992 4
1993 1
1994 4
1995 3
1996 5
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 6
2003 1
2004 3
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 4
2010 0
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 69
Download as CSV

Amy Arai publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Arai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 68–77 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323 69
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy Arai D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Arai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy Arai is affiliated with Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans several scientific disciplines, including Engineering, Social Sciences, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work includes contributions to the following fields:

  • Engineering
  • Social Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their research covers multiple subfields, notably:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Education
  • Molecular Biology

Their work addresses key topics such as:

  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research

Arai's recent scholarly output includes the publication titled "Perception of Pharmacology Education by Medical Sophomore students from 2000 to the present: impact of digital technology and educational policy" published in 2020 in The FASEB Journal. This reflects their engagement with education within the biomedical field.

Their publications have appeared primarily in:

  • The FASEB Journal

No frequent co-authors are listed for their works, indicating that their most recent publications may have been produced independently or with varied collaborators.

Best Publications

  • Inhibition of proteolysis protects hippocampal neurons from ischemia.

    Kevin S. Lee;Sherry Frank;Pete Vanderklish;Amy Arai

  • Positive Modulation of AMPA Receptors Increases Neurotrophin Expression by Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Gary Lynch;Peter Vanderklish;Amy Arai

  • Pharmacology of ampakine modulators: from AMPA receptors to synapses and behavior.

    Arai Ac;Kessler M

  • Factors regulating the magnitude of long-term potentiation induced by theta pattern stimulation

    Amy Arai;Gary Lynch

  • A novel mechanism for the facilitation of theta-induced long-term potentiation by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

    Enikö A. Kramár;Bin Lin;Ching Yi Lin;Amy C. Arai

  • The nature and causes of hippocampal long-term potentiation

    Gary Lynch;Markus Kessler;Amy Arai;John Larson

  • The effects of adenosine on the development of long-term potentiation

    Amy Arai;Markus Kessler;Gary Lynch

  • Effects of the potent ampakine CX614 on hippocampal and recombinant AMPA receptors: interactions with cyclothiazide and GYKI 52466.

    Amy C. Arai;Markus Kessler;Gary Rogers;Gary Lynch

  • Proteolysis of spectrin by calpain accompanies theta-burst stimulation in cultured hippocampal slices

    Peter Vanderklish;Takaomi C. Saido;Christine Gal;Amy Arai

  • A centrally active drug that modulates AMPA receptor gated currents

    Amy Arai;Markus Kessler;Peng Xiao;José Ambros-Ingerson

  • Benzamide-type AMPA receptor modulators form two subfamilies with distinct modes of action.

    Amy C. Arai;Yan-Fang Xia;Gary Rogers;Gary Lynch

  • Effects of a memory-enhancing drug on DL-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor currents and synaptic transmission in hippocampus.

    Amy Arai;Markus Kessler;Gary Rogers;Gary Lynch

  • Integrins regulate NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents.

    Bin Lin;Amy C. Arai;Gary Lynch;Christine M. Gall

  • Mutations in ionotropic AMPA receptor 3 alter channel properties and are associated with moderate cognitive impairment in humans

    Ye Wu;Ye Wu;Amy C Arai;Gavin Rumbaugh;Anand K Srivastava

  • Anoxia reveals a vulnerable period in the development of long-term potentiation.

    Amy Arai;John Larson;Gary Lynch

  • Calpain inhibitors improve the recovery of synaptic transmission from hypoxia in hippocampal slices.

    Amy Arai;Markus Kessler;Kevin Lee;Gary Lynch

  • Origins of the variations in long‐term potentiation between synapses in the basal versus apical dendrites of hippocampal neurons

    Amy Arai;Joel Black;Gary Lynch

  • A brief period of hypoxia causes proteolysis of cytoskeletal proteins in hippocampal slices

    Amy Arai;Peter Vanderklish;Markus Kessler;Kevin Lee

  • Synergistic interactions between ampakines and antipsychotic drugs.

    Steven A. Johnson;Nguyen T. Luu;Todd A. Herbst;Richard Knapp

  • Modulation of AMPA receptor kinetics differentially influences synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus

    A.C Arai;Y.-F Xia;E Suzuki

  • A centrally active drug that modulates AMPA receptor gated currents

    A. Arai;M. Kessler;J. Ambros Ingerson;P. Xiao

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary Lynch
Gary Lynch University of California, Irvine
Christine M. Gall
Christine M. Gall University of California, Irvine
John Larson
John Larson University of Illinois at Chicago
Olivier Civelli
Olivier Civelli University of California, Irvine
A. Richard Chamberlin
A. Richard Chamberlin University of California, Irvine
Michel Baudry
Michel Baudry Western University of Health Sciences
Ursula Staubli
Ursula Staubli New York University
Kevin S. Lee
Kevin S. Lee University of Virginia
Rachael L. Neve
Rachael L. Neve Harvard University
Jozef Gecz
Jozef Gecz University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields and additional qualifications that can boost their professional options. One common pathway is pursuing advanced clinical training, such as through psy d programs for those interested in clinical practice and psychological assessment.

Another area closely related to neuroscience is therapy and mental health counseling. Many choose to enroll in marriage and family therapy programs online to expand their expertise in family dynamics and therapeutic approaches while maintaining flexibility in their studies.

For those looking to start their academic journey or accelerate their education, earning a bachelor degree online in 2 years can be an efficient way to enter the field and pursue neuroscience faster than traditional routes.

When selecting a program, it's also important to consider long-term earning potential. Checking current trends in the best degree in the world can help guide your choice toward the most rewarding academic and career paths in neuroscience and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Amy Arai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles