World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. Cubison

Michael J. Cubison

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
16339
World Ranking
3958
National Ranking
1510

Michael J. Cubison publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Cubison sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael J. Cubison D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Cubison sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Cubison is affiliated with TOFWERK USA, based in the United States. Their research activity primarily focuses on environmental science with significant work in earth and planetary sciences. The major subfields of their study include atmospheric science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, spectroscopy, and analytical chemistry.

Their scholarly output covers a range of topics, prominently atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric ozone and climate, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, and analytical chemistry methods development.

Michael J. Cubison has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere, 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • New SOA Treatments Within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM): Strong Production and Sinks Govern Atmospheric SOA Distributions and Radiative Forcing, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Interferences with aerosol acidity quantification due to gas-phase ammonia uptake onto acidic sulfate filter samples, 2020, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Characterization of a new higher-resolution time-of-flight aerosol chemical speciation monitor: Application for measurements of atmospheric aerosols, 2025, Aerosol Science and Technology
  • Ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) for on- and offline analysis of atmospheric gas and aerosol species, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors in their research include J. L. Jiménez, Benjamin A. Nault, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Douglas A. Day, and Duseong S. Jo. Collaboration with these researchers has led to multiple joint publications.

Their work has been published in venues such as Communications Earth & Environment, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Aerosol Science and Technology, and UNC Libraries, reflecting a diverse range of platforms in atmospheric and environmental sciences.

Best Publications

  • Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere

    J. L. Jimenez;M. R. Canagaratna;N. M. Donahue;A. S. H. Prevot

  • Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies

    M. J. Cubison;M. J. Cubison;A. M. Ortega;A. M. Ortega;P. L. Hayes;P. L. Hayes;D. K. Farmer;D. K. Farmer

  • Characterization of Primary Organic Aerosol Emissions from Meat Cooking, Trash Burning, and Motor Vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry and Comparison with Ambient and Chamber Observations

    Claudia Mohr;J. Alex Huffman;Michael J. Cubison;Allison C. Aiken

  • Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment

    Allison Aiken;Allison Aiken;D. Salcedo;Michael J. Cubison;J. Huffman

  • Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing

    Qiaoqiao Wang;Daniel James Jacob;Jenny Allison Fisher;Jialin Mao;Jialin Mao

  • Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2

    M. Gysel;M. Gysel;J. Crosier;D. O. Topping;J. D. Whitehead

  • Chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements from two megacity field studies

    J. A. Huffman;J. A. Huffman;J. A. Huffman;K. S. Docherty;A. C. Aiken;A. C. Aiken;M. J. Cubison

  • Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign

    P. L. Hayes;A. M. Ortega;M. J. Cubison;K. D. Froyd;K. D. Froyd

  • Direct evidence for coastal iodine particles from Laminaria macroalgae – linkage to emissions of molecular iodine

    Gordon McFiggans;Hugh Coe;R. Burgess;J. Allan

  • A field-deployable, chemical ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer

    T. H. Bertram;J. R. Kimmel;T. A. Crisp;O. S. Ryder

  • The ToF-ACSM: a portable aerosol chemical speciation monitor with TOFMS detection

    R. Fröhlich;M. J. Cubison;J. G. Slowik;N. Bukowiecki

  • Sources, distribution, and acidity of sulfate–ammonium aerosol in the Arctic in winter–spring

    Jenny A. Fisher;Daniel James Jacob;Qiaoqiao Wang;Roya Bahreini;Roya Bahreini

  • Exploring the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft field campaigns with a global model

    C. L. Heald;H. Coe;J. L. Jimenez;R. J. Weber

  • Secondary organic aerosol formation and primary organic aerosol oxidation from biomass-burning smoke in a flow reactor during FLAME-3

    A. M. Ortega;D. A. Day;M. J. Cubison;W. H. Brune

  • Emissions of Black Carbon, Organic, and Inorganic Aerosols From Biomass Burning in North America and Asia in 2008

    Y. Kondo;H. Matsui;N. Moteki;L. Sahu;L. Sahu

  • Chemistry of hydrogen oxide radicals (HO x ) in the Arctic troposphere in spring

    Jialin Mao;Daniel J. Jacob;M. J. Evans;J. R. Olson

  • Hygroscopic growth and water uptake kinetics of two-phase aerosol particles consisting of ammonium sulfate, adipic and humic acid mixtures

    S. Sjogren;M. Gysel;E. Weingartner;U. Baltensperger

  • Nitrogen oxides and PAN in plumes from boreal fires during ARCTAS-B and their impact on ozone: an integrated analysis of aircraft and satellite observations

    M. J. Alvarado;J. A. Logan;J. Mao;E. Apel

  • The importance of aerosol mixing state and size-resolved composition on CCN concentration and the variation of the importance with atmospheric aging of aerosols

    J. Wang;M. J. Cubison;A. C. Aiken;J. L. Jimenez

  • Chemically-Resolved Volatility Measurements of Organic Aerosol from Different Sources

    J. A. Huffman;K. S. Docherty;C. Mohr;M. J. Cubison

Frequent Co-Authors

Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Armin Wisthaler
Armin Wisthaler University of Oslo
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Andrew J. Weinheimer
Andrew J. Weinheimer National Center for Atmospheric Research
Jessica B. Gilman
Jessica B. Gilman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Patrick L. Hayes
Patrick L. Hayes University of Montreal
Glenn S. Diskin
Glenn S. Diskin Langley Research Center
Douglas R. Worsnop
Douglas R. Worsnop University of Helsinki
Allison C. Aiken
Allison C. Aiken Los Alamos National Laboratory
William H. Brune
William H. Brune Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible and affordable educational options. Many students consider programs that align closely with their career goals, such as leadership or educational roles. Programs like the best eds to edd programs provide pathways for educators focusing on environmental education to elevate their qualifications.

Professionals aiming to incorporate social work perspectives in environmental advocacy might explore the dsw online programs. These doctorate options emphasize social justice and community support, complementing environmental efforts with human-centered approaches.

For students seeking a more general foundation before specializing, a cheap online general studies degree offers a broad curriculum that builds critical thinking and interdisciplinary skills, essential for addressing complex environmental challenges.

Moreover, those new to higher education might consider what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get to quickly enter the field or complement other studies with minimal barriers to completion. Overall, these diverse online degree options open multiple avenues for careers in Environmental Sciences and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Cubison

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles