World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6367
World Ranking
7886
National Ranking
3390

Julie C. Lauterborn publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie C. Lauterborn sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Julie C. Lauterborn D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie C. Lauterborn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie C. Lauterborn is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States and has a research profile centered on the fields of neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work extends into several subfields, notably cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, and genetics.

The main topics of their research cover neuroscience and neuropharmacology, memory and neural mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, receptor mechanisms and signaling, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, retinal development and disorders, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study.

They have contributed to a variety of peer-reviewed publications in collaboration with several frequent co-authors, including Gary Lynch, Aliza A. Le, Christine M. Gall, Conor D. Cox, and Yousheng Jia.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Julie C. Lauterborn include:

  • Increased excitatory to inhibitory synaptic ratio in parietal cortex samples from individuals with Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Functional excitatory to inhibitory synaptic imbalance and loss of cognitive performance in people with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change, 2022, Acta Neuropathologica
  • Prepubescent female rodents have enhanced hippocampal LTP and learning relative to males, reversing in adulthood as inhibition increases, 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • Rapid Aging in the Perforant Path Projections to the Rodent Dentate Gyrus, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Novel types of frequency filtering in the lateral perforant path projections to dentate gyrus, 2022, The Journal of Physiology

Julie C. Lauterborn has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), the Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Communications, Acta Neuropathologica, and Nature Neuroscience. The volume of their publications is notable in bioRxiv with six contributions, and they have three papers in the Journal of Neuroscience.

Their research largely explores the synaptic mechanisms and neural circuit dynamics underlying cognitive function and neurological conditions, with a clear interest in Alzheimer's disease and related neurodegenerative processes. The studies encompass cellular and molecular approaches to understanding excitatory to inhibitory synaptic balance, memory mechanisms, and neural signaling pathways.

Best Publications

  • Distribution of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Protein and mRNA in the Normal Adult Rat CNS: Evidence for Anterograde Axonal Transport

    James M. Conner;Julie C. Lauterborn;Qiao Yan;Christine M. Gall

  • Positive Modulation of AMPA Receptors Increases Neurotrophin Expression by Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Gary Lynch;Peter Vanderklish;Amy Arai

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Rescues Synaptic Plasticity in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Christopher S. Rex;Eniko Kramár;Lulu Y. Chen

  • Seizures, neuropeptide regulation, and mRNA expression in the hippocampus.

    Christine Gall;Julie Lauterborn;Paul Isackson;Jeffrey White

  • Differential Effects of Protein Synthesis Inhibition on the Activity-Dependent Expression of BDNF Transcripts: Evidence for Immediate-Early Gene Responses from Specific Promoters

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Santiago Rivera;Curtiss T. Stinis;Valerie Y. Hayes

  • Restoration of Long-Term Potentiation in Middle-Aged Hippocampus After Induction of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

    Christopher S. Rex;Julie C. Lauterborn;Ching Yi Lin;Eniko A. Kramár

  • Chronic Elevation of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor by Ampakines

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Giangsinh T. Truong;Michel Baudry;Xiaoning Bi

  • Physiological Activation of Synaptic Rac>PAK (p-21 Activated Kinase) Signaling Is Defective in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

    Lulu Y. Chen;Christopher S. Rex;Alex H. Babayan;Eniko A. Kramár

  • Co-localization of enkephalin and cholecystokinin in discrete areas of rat brain.

    Christine Gall;Julie Lauterborn;Doreen Burks;Kim Seroogy

  • Increased excitatory to inhibitory synaptic ratio in parietal cortex samples from individuals with Alzheimer's disease.

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Pietro Scaduto;Conor D. Cox;Anton Schulmann

  • In situ hybridization localization of choline acetyltransferase mRNA in adult rat brain and spinal cord.

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Paul J. Isackson;Raul Montalvo;Christine M. Gall

  • Fragile X Syndrome and Targeted Treatment Trials

    Randi J Hagerman;Julie Lauterborn;Jacky Au;Elizabeth Berry-Kravis

  • Memory-Related Synaptic Plasticity Is Sexually Dimorphic in Rodent Hippocampus.

    Weisheng Wang;Aliza A. Le;Bowen Hou;Julie C. Lauterborn

  • Seizures and the regulation of neurotrophic factor and neuropeptide gene expression in brain.

    C. Gall;J. Lauterborn;M. Bundman;Karl D Murray

  • Localization and alternative splicing of agrin mRNA in adult rat brain: transcripts encoding isoforms that aggregate acetylcholine receptors are not restricted to cholinergic regions

    LT O'Connor;JC Lauterborn;CM Gall;MA Smith

  • Enhanced CREB phosphorylation in immature dentate gyrus granule cells precedes neurotrophin expression and indicates a specific role of CREB in granule cell differentiation

    R. A. Bender;J. C. Lauterborn;C. M. Gall;W. Cariaga

  • Evidence of Mitochondrial Dysfunction within the Complex Genetic Etiology of Schizophrenia

    Brooke E. Hjelm;Brandi Rollins;Firoza Mamdani;Julie C. Lauterborn

  • Integrin dynamics produce a delayed stage of long-term potentiation and memory consolidation.

    Alex H. Babayan;Enikö A. Kramár;Ruth M. Barrett;Matiar Jafari

  • Cellular Localization of NGF and NT-3 mRNAs in Postnatal Rat Forebrain

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Paul J. Isackson;Christine M. Gall

  • Nerve growth factor mRNA‐containing cells are distributed within regions of cholinergic neurons in the rat basal forebrain

    Julie C. Lauterborn;Paul J. Isackson;Christine M. Gall

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine M. Gall
Christine M. Gall University of California, Irvine
Enikö A. Kramár
Enikö A. Kramár University of California, Irvine
Jennifer L. Bizon
Jennifer L. Bizon University of Florida
Tallie Z. Baram
Tallie Z. Baram University of California, Irvine
Xiaoning Bi
Xiaoning Bi College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Kim B. Seroogy
Kim B. Seroogy University of Cincinnati
Charles E. Ribak
Charles E. Ribak University of California, Irvine
Michel Baudry
Michel Baudry Western University of Health Sciences
James M. Conner
James M. Conner University of California, San Diego
George Kirov
George Kirov Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to various online degree options and dynamic career paths. Many students interested in psychology or mental health fields may consider pursuing an online psyd to deepen their expertise in clinical practice. For those interested in counseling or marriage and family therapy, there are also flexible mft programs online that provide accelerated routes to licensure.

If you’re looking to earn your undergraduate degree quickly, pursuing a bachelor degree online in 2 years can be a smart pathway, especially for those aiming to fast-track their entry into neuroscience or related health sciences. As you evaluate options, it’s also valuable to research which programs offer the best degree in the world in terms of earning potential and job prospects.

Online education in neuroscience and related fields continues to grow, making it easier than ever to balance studies with work or personal commitments while preparing for rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Julie C. Lauterborn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles