World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4387 4057 2440 2206 207 12124

Thomas H. Brandon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas H. Brandon between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas H. Brandon published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 11 of the 251 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
1986 2025

251 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas H. Brandon: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 0
1998 2
1999 3
2000 5
2001 4
2002 8
2003 5
2004 11
2005 4
2006 2
2007 7
2008 7
2009 3
2010 10
2011 9
2012 9
2013 7
2014 19
2015 14
2016 17
2017 14
2018 19
2019 8
2020 8
2021 9
2022 11
2023 10
2024 4
2025 7
Total 251
Download as CSV

Thomas H. Brandon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Brandon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 207 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 207
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas H. Brandon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Brandon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Thomas H. Brandon is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and psychology, with a focus on topics related to smoking behavior, cessation, and behavioral health interventions.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

The key subfields they have contributed to consist of:

  • Physiology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Molecular Biology

Thomas H. Brandon's work addresses significant topics such as:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Media Influence and Health

Frequent publication venues where this researcher's work appears include:

  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Cancer
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Addiction

Notable recent papers by Thomas H. Brandon are:

  • "Targeted smoking cessation for dual users of combustible and electronic cigarettes: a randomised controlled trial" (2021, The Lancet Public Health)
  • "The clinical potential of augmented reality." (2020, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice)
  • "Associations between Perceived Racial Discrimination and Tobacco Cessation among Diverse Treatment Seekers" (2020, Ethnicity & Disease)
  • "Self-help smoking cessation intervention for Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinxs in the United States: A randomized controlled trial" (2021, Cancer)
  • "Augmented Reality for Smoking Cessation: Development and Usability Study" (2020, JMIR mhealth and uhealth)

The researcher collaborates regularly with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Vani N. Simmons
  • Karen O. Brandon
  • Steven K. Sutton
  • Úrsula Martínez
  • Christine Vinci

Thomas H. Brandon received recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68).

    Megan E. Piper;Thomas M. Piasecki;E. Belle Federman;Daniel M. Bolt

  • The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students.

    Thomas H. Brandon;Timothy B. Baker

  • Motivational Influences on Cigarette Smoking

    Timothy B. Baker;Thomas H. Brandon;Laurie Chassin

  • The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult: Measurement of Smoking Outcome Expectancies of Experienced Smokers.

    Amy L. Copeland;Thomas H. Brandon;Edward P. Quinn

  • Relapse and relapse prevention.

    Thomas H. Brandon;Jennifer Irvin Vidrine;Erika B. Litvin

  • Pain, Nicotine, and Smoking: Research Findings and Mechanistic Considerations.

    Joseph W. Ditre;Thomas H. Brandon;Emily L. Zale;Mary M. Meagher

  • Negative Affect as Motivation to Smoke

    Thomas H. Brandon

  • Pretreatment task persistence predicts smoking cessation outcome

    Thomas H. Brandon;Thaddeus A. Herzog;Laura M. Juliano;Jennifer E. Irvin

  • The early time course of smoking withdrawal effects

    Peter S. Hendricks;Joseph W. Ditre;David J. Drobes;Thomas H. Brandon;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Assessing Tobacco Use by Cancer Patients and Facilitating Cessation: An American Association for Cancer Research Policy Statement

    Benjamin A. Toll;Thomas H. Brandon;Ellen R. Gritz;Graham W. Warren

  • Motivational interviewing with personalized feedback: a brief intervention for motivating smokers with schizophrenia to seek treatment for tobacco dependence.

    Marc L. Steinberg;Douglas M. Ziedonis;Jonathan A. Krejci;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Is task persistence related to smoking and substance abuse? The application of learned industriousness theory to addictive behaviors.

    Edward P. Quinn;Thomas H. Brandon;Amy L. Copeland

  • Effects of extinction context and retrieval cues on alcohol cue reactivity among nonalcoholic drinkers.

    Bradley N. Collins;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Expectancies for tobacco smoking.

    Thomas H. Brandon;Laura M. Juliano;Amy L. Copeland

  • Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: Evidence with urge and reaction time.

    Laura M. Juliano;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Effects of nicotine dose, instructional set, and outcome expectancies on the subjective effects of smoking in the presence of a stressor

    Laura M. Juliano;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Gender differences in use and expectancies of e-cigarettes: Online survey results.

    Bárbara Piñeiro;John B. Correa;Vani N. Simmons;Paul T. Harrell

  • Measures of affect and nicotine dependence predict differential response to smoking cessation treatments.

    Diane C. Zelman;Thomas H. Brandon;Douglas E. Jorenby;Timothy B. Baker

  • Pain as a Motivator of Smoking: Effects of Pain Induction on Smoking Urge and Behavior

    Joseph W. Ditre;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Cognitive and social learning models of drug dependence: implications for the assessment of tobacco dependence in adolescents.

    Thomas H. Brandon;Thaddeus A. Herzog;Jennifer E. Irvin;Chad J. Gwaltney

  • Classical conditions of environmental cues to cigarette smoking.

    Amy B. Lazev;Thaddeus A. Herzog;Thomas H. Brandon

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Drobes
David J. Drobes University of South Florida
Joseph W. Ditre
Joseph W. Ditre Syracuse University
Roy S. Herbst
Roy S. Herbst Yale University
Peter S. Hendricks
Peter S. Hendricks University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ellen R. Gritz
Ellen R. Gritz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dorothy K. Hatsukami
Dorothy K. Hatsukami University of Minnesota
Paul B. Jacobsen
Paul B. Jacobsen National Institutes of Health
Jamie S. Ostroff
Jamie S. Ostroff Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Marloes Kleinjan
Marloes Kleinjan Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a variety of career opportunities. Many top colleges across the country offer programs tailored for flexible learning, allowing students to balance studies with work or personal commitments.

When considering where to study, it's helpful to look at standout institutions in specific regions. For example, the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Charlotte are recognized for their academic rigor and strong graduate networks. Similarly, the popular psychology programs in Washington, D.C. offer unique access to government and research organizations, enhancing internship and job prospects.

In addition, the popular psychology programs in Delaware and the most popular psychology degree programs in Fort Worth cater to a diverse student base and include specialized tracks such as counseling, industrial-organizational psychology, and school psychology.

Graduates can pursue roles in mental health services, human resources, research, or further their studies in clinical psychology or related fields. Online degrees provide a pathway to these rewarding careers, often with the flexibility to complete coursework at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas H. Brandon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles