World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4745
World Ranking
10538
National Ranking
5534

Peter S. Hendricks publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter S. Hendricks sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter S. Hendricks D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter S. Hendricks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter S. Hendricks is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and medicine, with substantial contributions to clinical psychology and organic chemistry. Other subfields of study include cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, and toxicology.

The main topics covered in their work include psychedelics and drug studies, chemical synthesis and alkaloids, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, smoking behavior and cessation, forensic toxicology and drug analysis, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, and diverse academic research themes.

Recent significant publications by Peter S. Hendricks include:

  • Prevalence and associations of challenging, difficult or distressing experiences using classic psychedelics, 2023, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use and markers of physical health, 2021, Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use and cardiometabolic diseases, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Classic psychedelics in the treatment of substance use disorder: Potential synergies with twelve-step programs, 2021, International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Psychedelic Commercialization: A Wide-Spanning Overview of the Emerging Psychedelic Industry, 2023, Psychedelic Medicine

Frequent co-authors contributing to their body of work are:

  • Otto Simonsson
  • Walter Osika
  • Simon B. Goldberg
  • Karen L. Cropsey
  • Charles D. Nichols

Peter S. Hendricks has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Psychedelic Medicine
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

The research profile reflects a strong multidisciplinary approach bridging psychological science and medical disciplines, particularly within the realm of substance use and psychedelic research.

Best Publications

  • Classic psychedelics: An integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function.

    Matthew W. Johnson;Peter S. Hendricks;Frederick S. Barrett;Roland R. Griffiths

  • Classic psychedelic use is associated with reduced psychological distress and suicidality in the United States adult population

    Peter S Hendricks;Christopher B Thorne;C Brendan Clark;David W Coombs

  • Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a meta-analytic review.

    Jennifer E. Hettema;Peter S. Hendricks

  • The abuse potential of medical psilocybin according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act.

    Matthew W. Johnson;Roland R. Griffiths;Peter S. Hendricks;Jack E. Henningfield

  • Dropout rates of in-person psychosocial substance use disorder treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Sara N Lappan;Andrew W Brown;Peter S Hendricks

  • The early time course of smoking withdrawal effects

    Peter S. Hendricks;Joseph W. Ditre;David J. Drobes;Thomas H. Brandon;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Awe: a putative mechanism underlying the effects of classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy.

    Peter S Hendricks

  • Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

    Lisa M. Fucito;Sharon Czabafy;Peter S. Hendricks;Chris Kotsen

  • Psilocybin, psychological distress, and suicidality:

    Peter S Hendricks;Matthew W Johnson;Roland R Griffiths

  • The increasing recalcitrance of smokers in clinical trials II: Pharmacotherapy trials.

    Jennifer E. Irvin;Peter S. Hendricks;Thomas H. Brandon

  • Hallucinogen use predicts reduced recidivism among substance-involved offenders under community corrections supervision

    Peter S Hendricks;C Brendan Clark;Matthew W Johnson;Kevin R Fontaine

  • The relationships of classic psychedelic use with criminal behavior in the United States adult population

    Peter S Hendricks;Michael Scott Crawford;Karen L Cropsey;Heith Copes

  • Mechanisms of change in extended cognitive behavioral treatment for tobacco dependence.

    Peter S. Hendricks;Kevin L. Delucchi;Sharon M. Hall

  • Associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use and markers of physical health

    Otto Simonsson;James D Sexton;Peter S Hendricks

  • Electronic cigarettes in adults in outpatient substance use treatment: Awareness, perceptions, use, and reasons for use

    Erica N. Peters;Paul T. Harrell;Peter S. Hendricks;Kevin E. O'Grady

  • The Smoking Abstinence Questionnaire: measurement of smokers' abstinence-related expectancies.

    Peter S. Hendricks;Sabrina B. Wood;Majel R. Baker;Kevin L. Delucchi

  • Narrative identity, rationality, and microdosing classic psychedelics

    Megan Webb;Heith Copes;Peter S. Hendricks

  • A measure of perceived pain and tobacco smoking interrelations: pilot validation of the pain and smoking inventory.

    Joseph W. Ditre;Emily L. Zale;Bryan W. Heckman;Peter S. Hendricks

  • A behavioral economic assessment of individualizing versus binding moral foundations

    C. Brendan Clark;Jeffrey A. Swails;Heidi M. Pontinen;Shannon E. Bowerman

  • Evaluating the validities of different DSM-IV-based conceptual constructs of tobacco dependence.

    Peter S. Hendricks;Judith J. Prochaska;Gary L. Humfleet;Sharon M. Hall

  • Smoking abstinence-related expectancies among American Indians, African Americans, and women: potential mechanisms of tobacco-related disparities.

    Peter S. Hendricks;J. Lee Westmaas;Van M. Ta Park;Christopher B. Thorne

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen L. Cropsey
Karen L. Cropsey University of Alabama at Birmingham
Sharon M. Hall
Sharon M. Hall University of California, San Francisco
Thomas H. Brandon
Thomas H. Brandon University of South Florida
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
Matthew W. Johnson
Matthew W. Johnson Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Heith Copes
Heith Copes University of Alabama at Birmingham
Adam M. Leventhal
Adam M. Leventhal University of Southern California
Adrienne C. Lahti
Adrienne C. Lahti University of Alabama at Birmingham
Richard C. Shelton
Richard C. Shelton University of Alabama at Birmingham
Zach Walsh
Zach Walsh University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse degree and career options, especially in counseling and behavioral analysis. Online psychology degrees are increasingly popular, offering flexibility and access to programs tailored for aspiring professionals.

If your goal is to become a mental health counselor in Washington DC, you will need to meet state-specific education and licensure standards. Each state has unique criteria, so it’s important to research the requirements in your intended location. For example, you can learn about the Wichita mental health counselor education requirements, which detail the minimum degree, supervised experience, and relevant exams needed for practice.

Certification is another crucial step, as highlighted by the Winston Salem mental health counselor certification requirements. Online programs often support students in meeting these prerequisites with flexible coursework and supervised practicum opportunities.

Many students are also interested in behavior analysis careers. If you’re considering becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) or pursuing applied behavior analysis (ABA) roles, it’s worth investigating aba salary in the us to compare earning potential by state.

Best Scientists Citing Peter S. Hendricks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles