World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
8533
World Ranking
8003
National Ranking
3437

Ivan Osorio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Osorio sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 105 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ivan Osorio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Osorio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivan Osorio is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focused on Neuroscience and Medicine, with additional work in Computer Science. Their subfields of study reflect this interdisciplinary approach, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The scientist's work involves a range of topics centered around brain function and disorders. These include Neurological disorders and treatments, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation, Neural dynamics and brain function, and stochastic dynamics and bifurcation.

Ivan Osorio has contributed to the academic literature with publications in notable venues, particularly the journal Epilepsy & Behavior. One documented paper is titled "Anatomical connectivity and efficacy of electro-therapy for seizure control: A SANTE's single-center regression analyses," published in 2021 in the journal Epilepsy & Behavior.

Throughout their work, Ivan Osorio has collaborated with several coauthors, including Jonathon E. Giftakis, Paul H. Stypulkowski, and Lisa Tonder. These collaborations indicate an engagement with peers in related scientific fields.

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • stochastic dynamics and bifurcation

  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publication venue)

  • Jonathon E. Giftakis
  • Paul H. Stypulkowski
  • Lisa Tonder

Best Publications

  • Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy

    Robert Fisher;Vicenta Salanova;Thomas Witt;Robert Worth

  • Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures A randomized active-control trial

    Adrian Handforth;Adrian Handforth;C. M. DeGiorgio;S. C. Schachter;B. M. Uthman

  • Prospective Long-Term Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Seizures

    C. M. DeGiorgio;S. C. Schachter;A. Handforth;M. Salinsky

  • Real-Time Automated Detection and Quantitative Analysis of Seizures and Short-Term Prediction of Clinical Onset

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Steven B. Wilkinson

  • Automated seizure abatement in humans using electrical stimulation.

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Sridhar Sunderam;Jonathon Giftakis

  • High frequency thalamic stimulation for inoperable mesial temporal epilepsy.

    Ivan Osorio;John Overman;Jonathon Giftakis;Steven B. Wilkinson

  • Performance Reassessment of a Real-time Seizure-detection Algorithm on Long ECoG Series

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Jon Giftakis;Tom Peters

  • Epileptic seizures: Quakes of the brain?

    Iva N. Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Didier Sornette;John Milton

  • Inability of Lyapunov exponents to predict epileptic seizures

    Ying Cheng Lai;Mary Ann F Harrison;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio

  • An Introduction to Contingent (Closed-Loop) Brain Electrical Stimulation for Seizure Blockage, to Ultra-short-term Clinical Trials, and to Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy

    Unknown

  • Systems for prediction, rapid detection, warning, prevention or control of changes in activity states in the brain

    Josef Dorfmeister;Mark Frei;David Lerner;Ivan Osorio

  • The roles of semantic networks and search efficiency in verbal fluency performance in intractable temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Alexander I. Tröster;Valerie Warmflash;Ivan Osorio;Anthony M. Paolo

  • Correlation dimension and integral do not predict epileptic seizures.

    Mary Ann F. Harrison;Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Srividhya Asuri

  • Treatment of Refractory Generalized Tonic‐Clonic Status Epilepticus with Pentobarbital Anesthesia After High‐Dose Phenytoin

    Unknown

  • Seizure abatement with single dc pulses: is phase resetting at play?

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei

  • Accumulated energy revisited.

    Mary Ann F. Harrison;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio;Ivan Osorio

  • Pharmaco-resistant seizures: self-triggering capacity, scale-free properties and predictability?

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Didier Sornette;John Milton

  • Observations on the application of the correlation dimension and correlation integral to the prediction of seizures.

    Ivan Osorio;Mary Ann F. Harrison;Ying-Cheng Lai;Mark G. Frei

  • Automated seizure detection using EKG.

    Ivan Osorio

  • Gaussian mixture models of ECoG signal features for improved detection of epileptic seizures.

    Lingmin Meng;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio;Gilbert Strang

  • Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures

    Adrian Handforth;C. M. DeGiorgio;S. C. Schachter;B. M. Uthman

  • Controversies in epilepsy: Debates held during the Fourth International Workshop on Seizure Prediction

    Mark G Mg Frei;Hitten P Hp Zaveri;Susan S Arthurs;Gregory K Gk Bergey

  • Patient and caregiver perspectives on seizure prediction.

    Susan Arthurs;Hitten P. Zaveri;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio

  • Stochastic modeling and prediction of experimental seizures in Sprague-Dawley rats.

    Sridhar Sunderam;Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;James F. Watkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Ying-Cheng Lai
Ying-Cheng Lai Arizona State University
Thomas R. Henry
Thomas R. Henry University of Minnesota
Steven C. Schachter
Steven C. Schachter Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Adrian Handforth
Adrian Handforth Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Hitten P. Zaveri
Hitten P. Zaveri Yale University
Martin C. Salinsky
Martin C. Salinsky Oregon Health & Science University
George L. Morris
George L. Morris Medical College of Wisconsin
Douglas Labar
Douglas Labar Cornell University
Basim M. Uthman
Basim M. Uthman Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of careers and advanced study opportunities, especially with the flexibility of online education. Many students interested in the neural sciences also pursue counseling or psychology pathways, which often complement neuroscience backgrounds.

If you are considering a clinical or counseling role, look for a cacrep-accredited program. These programs meet high standards and prepare students for licensure requirements in the counseling field. For those who prefer a broader approach to human behavior, a masters of psychology online can provide research, analytical, and intervention skills valuable in many professions.

Students interested in supporting individuals and families through neuropsychological challenges may consider a marriage and family therapist degree. This degree equips graduates to work with complex family dynamics and mental health conditions. Additionally, those seeking affordability and flexibility can explore a masters in counseling through online colleges, making it easier to balance work and study.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees empower neuroscience students to build interdisciplinary skills and access fulfilling, impactful careers in mental health and research.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Osorio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles