World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8003 7392 3437 3109 105 8533

Ivan Osorio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ivan Osorio between 1989 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ivan Osorio published across 34 years, from 1989 to 2022, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2007. 2 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2007. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication
1989 2022

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ivan Osorio: publications per year, 1989 to 2022
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 3
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 0
1997 3
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 8
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 4
2007 13
2008 6
2009 6
2010 13
2011 8
2012 0
2013 1
2014 8
2015 6
2016 0
2017 2
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 1
Total 110
Download as CSV

Ivan Osorio publications per year - data summary

  • Ivan Osorio, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Kansas, has 110 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1989 to 2022.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2022.
  • The most productive years are 2007 and 2010, with 13 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2013, 2019, 2021 and 2022, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 34 years in the span carry no publications at all (1990, 1992, 1993, 1994 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.4 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2018-2022) hold 3 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2000: 19 publications (1.6 per year); 2001-2012: 71 publications (5.9 per year); 2013-2022: 20 publications (2.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ivan Osorio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Osorio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 105 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 105
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ivan Osorio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Ivan Osorio, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Kansas, records 105 publications - the 20th percentile of the discipline.
  • 20% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Ivan Osorio, and about 80% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Ivan Osorio ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Ivan Osorio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Osorio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Ivan Osorio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Ivan Osorio, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Kansas, records 40 D-Index - the 17th percentile of the discipline.
  • 17% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Ivan Osorio, and about 83% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Ivan Osorio ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Ivan Osorio is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focused on Neuroscience and Medicine, with additional work in Computer Science. Their subfields of study reflect this interdisciplinary approach, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The scientist's work involves a range of topics centered around brain function and disorders. These include Neurological disorders and treatments, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation, Neural dynamics and brain function, and stochastic dynamics and bifurcation.

Ivan Osorio has contributed to the academic literature with publications in notable venues, particularly the journal Epilepsy & Behavior. One documented paper is titled "Anatomical connectivity and efficacy of electro-therapy for seizure control: A SANTE's single-center regression analyses," published in 2021 in the journal Epilepsy & Behavior.

Throughout their work, Ivan Osorio has collaborated with several coauthors, including Jonathon E. Giftakis, Paul H. Stypulkowski, and Lisa Tonder. These collaborations indicate an engagement with peers in related scientific fields.

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • stochastic dynamics and bifurcation

  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publication venue)

  • Jonathon E. Giftakis
  • Paul H. Stypulkowski
  • Lisa Tonder

Best Publications

  • Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy

    Robert Fisher;Vicenta Salanova;Thomas Witt;Robert Worth

  • Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures A randomized active-control trial

    Adrian Handforth;Adrian Handforth;C. M. DeGiorgio;S. C. Schachter;B. M. Uthman

  • Prospective Long-Term Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Seizures

    C. M. DeGiorgio;S. C. Schachter;A. Handforth;M. Salinsky

  • Real-Time Automated Detection and Quantitative Analysis of Seizures and Short-Term Prediction of Clinical Onset

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Steven B. Wilkinson

  • Automated seizure abatement in humans using electrical stimulation.

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Sridhar Sunderam;Jonathon Giftakis

  • High frequency thalamic stimulation for inoperable mesial temporal epilepsy.

    Ivan Osorio;John Overman;Jonathon Giftakis;Steven B. Wilkinson

  • Performance Reassessment of a Real-time Seizure-detection Algorithm on Long ECoG Series

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Jon Giftakis;Tom Peters

  • Epileptic seizures: Quakes of the brain?

    Iva N. Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Didier Sornette;John Milton

  • Inability of Lyapunov exponents to predict epileptic seizures

    Ying Cheng Lai;Mary Ann F Harrison;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio

  • An Introduction to Contingent (Closed-Loop) Brain Electrical Stimulation for Seizure Blockage, to Ultra-short-term Clinical Trials, and to Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy

    Unknown

  • Systems for prediction, rapid detection, warning, prevention or control of changes in activity states in the brain

    Josef Dorfmeister;Mark Frei;David Lerner;Ivan Osorio

  • The roles of semantic networks and search efficiency in verbal fluency performance in intractable temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Alexander I. Tröster;Valerie Warmflash;Ivan Osorio;Anthony M. Paolo

  • Correlation dimension and integral do not predict epileptic seizures.

    Mary Ann F. Harrison;Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Srividhya Asuri

  • Treatment of Refractory Generalized Tonic‐Clonic Status Epilepticus with Pentobarbital Anesthesia After High‐Dose Phenytoin

    Unknown

  • Seizure abatement with single dc pulses: is phase resetting at play?

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei

  • Accumulated energy revisited.

    Mary Ann F. Harrison;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio;Ivan Osorio

  • Pharmaco-resistant seizures: self-triggering capacity, scale-free properties and predictability?

    Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;Didier Sornette;John Milton

  • Observations on the application of the correlation dimension and correlation integral to the prediction of seizures.

    Ivan Osorio;Mary Ann F. Harrison;Ying-Cheng Lai;Mark G. Frei

  • Automated seizure detection using EKG.

    Ivan Osorio

  • Gaussian mixture models of ECoG signal features for improved detection of epileptic seizures.

    Lingmin Meng;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio;Gilbert Strang

  • Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures

    Adrian Handforth;C. M. DeGiorgio;S. C. Schachter;B. M. Uthman

  • Controversies in epilepsy: Debates held during the Fourth International Workshop on Seizure Prediction

    Mark G Mg Frei;Hitten P Hp Zaveri;Susan S Arthurs;Gregory K Gk Bergey

  • Patient and caregiver perspectives on seizure prediction.

    Susan Arthurs;Hitten P. Zaveri;Mark G. Frei;Ivan Osorio

  • Stochastic modeling and prediction of experimental seizures in Sprague-Dawley rats.

    Sridhar Sunderam;Ivan Osorio;Mark G. Frei;James F. Watkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Ying-Cheng Lai
Ying-Cheng Lai Arizona State University
Thomas R. Henry
Thomas R. Henry University of Minnesota
Steven C. Schachter
Steven C. Schachter Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Adrian Handforth
Adrian Handforth Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Hitten P. Zaveri
Hitten P. Zaveri Yale University
Martin C. Salinsky
Martin C. Salinsky Oregon Health & Science University
George L. Morris
George L. Morris Medical College of Wisconsin
Douglas Labar
Douglas Labar Cornell University
Basim M. Uthman
Basim M. Uthman Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of careers and advanced study opportunities, especially with the flexibility of online education. Many students interested in the neural sciences also pursue counseling or psychology pathways, which often complement neuroscience backgrounds.

If you are considering a clinical or counseling role, look for a cacrep-accredited program. These programs meet high standards and prepare students for licensure requirements in the counseling field. For those who prefer a broader approach to human behavior, a masters of psychology online can provide research, analytical, and intervention skills valuable in many professions.

Students interested in supporting individuals and families through neuropsychological challenges may consider a marriage and family therapist degree. This degree equips graduates to work with complex family dynamics and mental health conditions. Additionally, those seeking affordability and flexibility can explore a masters in counseling through online colleges, making it easier to balance work and study.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees empower neuroscience students to build interdisciplinary skills and access fulfilling, impactful careers in mental health and research.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Osorio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles