World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
26292
World Ranking
17919
National Ranking
1633

Rupert M. Pearse publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rupert M. Pearse sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 352 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rupert M. Pearse D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rupert M. Pearse sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rupert M. Pearse is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular attention to several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's main topics of work cover a range of clinical and healthcare aspects such as:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Global Health and Surgery
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices

Pearse has published extensively, with several recent notable papers including:

  • "Postoperative acute kidney injury in adult non-cardiac surgery: joint consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative and PeriOperative Quality Initiative" (2021), Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • "Ethnicity and outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 infection in East London: an observational cohort study" (2021), BMJ Open
  • "Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: cardiovascular outcomes" (2020), British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Surgical activity in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide observational cohort study" (2021), British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Variation in global uptake of the Surgical Safety Checklist" (2020), British journal of surgery

Their frequent co-authors demonstrate a collaborative research network in perioperative medicine and related fields. These include:

  • Tom Abbott
  • John R. Prowle
  • Alexander J. Fowler
  • Bruce Biccard
  • Zudin Puthucheary

Rupert M. Pearse also publishes regularly in several key venues related to anesthesia, surgery, and medical sciences. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BJA Open
  • British journal of surgery
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study

    Rupert M. Pearse;Rui P Moreno;Peter Bauer;Paolo Pelosi

  • Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

    P. J. Devereaux;M. T. Chan;P. Alonso-Coello

  • Effect of a Perioperative, Cardiac Output–Guided Hemodynamic Therapy Algorithm on Outcomes Following Major Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Systematic Review

    Rupert M. Pearse;David A. Harrison;Neil MacDonald;Michael A. Gillies

  • Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445].

    Rupert M. Pearse;Deborah Dawson;Jayne Fawcett;Andrew Rhodes

  • Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures.

    Ib Jammer;Nadine Wickboldt;Michael Sander;Andrew Smith

  • Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom

    Rupert M Pearse;David A Harrison;Philip James;David Watson

  • Association of Postoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin Levels With Myocardial Injury and 30-Day Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

    P. J. Devereaux;Bruce M. Biccard;Alben Sigamani;Denis Xavier

  • Functional definition and characterization of acute traumatic coagulopathy.

    Ross Davenport;Joanna Manson;Henry De’Ath;Sean Platton

  • Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: Prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries

    T Ahmad;RA Bouwman;I Grigoras;C Aldecoa

  • Meta-analysis of the association between preoperative anaemia and mortality after surgery.

    A. J. Fowler;T. Ahmad;M. K. Phull;S. Allard

  • Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study

    Bruce M Biccard;Thandinkosi E Madiba;Hyla-Louise Kluyts;Dolly M Munlemvo

  • Erratum to: 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: Brussels, Belgium. 15-18 March 2016

    R. M. Bateman;M. D. Sharpe;J. E. Jagger;C. G. Ellis

  • Preoperative anaemia is associated with poor clinical outcome in non-cardiac surgery patients

    D M Baron;H Hochrieser;M Posch;B Metnitz

  • Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study

    Duminda N Wijeysundera;Rupert M Pearse;Mark A Shulman;Mark A Shulman;Tom E F Abbott

  • Guidelines on the management of anaemia and red cell transfusion in adult critically ill patients.

    Andrew Retter;Duncan Wyncoll;Rupert Pearse;Damien Carson

  • Changes in central venous saturation after major surgery, and association with outcome

    Rupert M. Pearse;Deborah Dawson;Jayne Fawcett;Andrew Rhodes

  • The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock.

    Shaman Jhanji;Sarah Stirling;Nakul Patel;Charles J. Hinds

  • Mortality and utilisation of critical care resources amongst high-risk surgical patients in a large NHS trust*

    S. Jhanji;B. Thomas;A. Ely;D. Watson

  • Age of patients undergoing surgery

    A J Fowler;T E F Abbott;J Prowle;R M Pearse

  • Preoperative Anaemia Is Associated With Poor Clinical Outcome in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients

    D. M. Baron;H. Hochrieser;M. Posch;B. Metnitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Duminda N. Wijeysundera
Duminda N. Wijeysundera University of Toronto
Andrew Rhodes
Andrew Rhodes St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Michael P. W. Grocott
Michael P. W. Grocott University of Southampton
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Matthew T. V. Chan
Matthew T. V. Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Paul S. Myles
Paul S. Myles Monash University
Philip J. Devereaux
Philip J. Devereaux Population Health Research Institute
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Chloe Orkin
Chloe Orkin Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA now extends beyond traditional classrooms. Online degree options make it easier for aspiring professionals to enter healthcare fields or advance their expertise.

For those interested in admin roles, medical billing and coding online courses offer flexible pathways into healthcare management. Nurses can grow their practice by enrolling in the most affordable nurse practitioner programs, blending clinical skills and theory at a lower cost.

Financial barriers remain a concern for many students. Exploring what is the cheapest online college for nursing? helps prospective nurses find credible, budget-friendly options. Meanwhile, experienced nurses can reach the top of their field through phd in nursing online programs, enabling them to lead, teach, or conduct research.

These online pathways open doors for diverse learners aiming to start, shift, or elevate their healthcare careers—offering both flexibility and affordability in today's dynamic educational landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Rupert M. Pearse

Trending Scientists