World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
59562
World Ranking
7186
National Ranking
403

Claudia Spies publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Spies sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 970 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Claudia Spies D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Spies sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudia Spies is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany and has an extensive research profile in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on critical care and intensive care medicine.

Their research spans several related subfields, including:

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

The main topics of their work include:

  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Among frequently publishing venues, they have contributed multiple studies to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie
  • BMJ Open
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Scientific Reports

Some of the notable papers in which Claudia Spies has contributed include:

  • "A time-resolved proteomic and prognostic map of COVID-19" (2021) published in Cell Systems
  • "Update of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium in adult patients" (2023) in European Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • "Improving perioperative brain health: an expert consensus review of key actions for the perioperative care team" (2021) in British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in critically ill patients: diagnostic reliability of HLH-2004 criteria and HScore" (2020) in Critical Care
  • "Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings - Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test" (2020) in Journal of the Intensive Care Society

Collaborations have been notable with frequent co-authors including:

  • Felix Balzer
  • Björn Weiß
  • Georg Winterer
  • Friedrich Borchers
  • Arjen J. C. Slooter

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study

    Rupert M. Pearse;Rui P Moreno;Peter Bauer;Paolo Pelosi

  • Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations.

    Kristoffer Lassen;Mattias Soop;Jonas Nygren;P. Boris W. Cox

  • A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure

    Didier Payen;Anne-Cornélie Jm de Pont;Yasser Sakr;Claudia D. Spies

  • Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology.

    Smith I;Kranke P;Murat I;Smith A

  • European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium

    César Aldecoa;Gabriella Bettelli;Federico Bilotta;Robert D. Sanders

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems

    Annika Reintam Blaser;Annika Reintam Blaser;Manu L. N. G. Malbrain;Joel Starkopf;Joel Starkopf;Sonja Fruhwald

  • ESPEN Guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care

    KG Kreymann;MM Berger;NE Deutz;M Hiesmayr

  • Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study

    Maurizio Cecconi;Christoph Hofer;Jean-Louis Teboul;Ville Pettila

  • Monitoring depth of anaesthesia in a randomized trial decreases the rate of postoperative delirium but not postoperative cognitive dysfunction

    F.M. Radtke;M. Franck;J. Lendner;S. Krüger

  • Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept.

    Jean Louis Vincent;Yahya Shehabi;Timothy S. Walsh;Pratik P. Pandharipande

  • Different assessment tools for intensive care unit delirium: which score to use?

    Alawi Luetz;Anja Heymann;Finn M. Radtke;Chokri Chenitir

  • Epinephrine impairs splanchnic perfusion in septic shock.

    Andreas Meier-Hellmann;Konrad Reinhart;Donald L. Bredle;Martin Specht

  • Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) – short version

    DAS-Taskforce;Ralf Baron;Andreas Binder;Rolf Biniek

  • The effect of a novel extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption device on IL-6 elimination in septic patients: A randomized controlled trial

    Dirk Schädler;Christine Pausch;Daniel Heise;Andreas Meier-Hellmann

  • Serum Cardiac Troponin T as a Prognostic Marker in Early Sepsis

    Claudia Spies;Volker Haude;Rudolf Fitzner;Klaus Schröder

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Evidence and consensus-based German guidelines for the management of analgesia, sedation and delirium in intensive care--short version.

    Jörg Martin;Anja Heymann;Katrin Bäsell;Ralf Baron

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg Winterer
Georg Winterer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Konrad Reinhart
Konrad Reinhart Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Tobias Welte
Tobias Welte University of Hannover
Christian Müller
Christian Müller Freie Universität Berlin
Petra Gastmeier
Petra Gastmeier Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Tobias Pischon
Tobias Pischon Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Jalid Sehouli
Jalid Sehouli Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Harald Seifert
Harald Seifert University of Cologne
Rolf Rossaint
Rolf Rossaint RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school, online programs offer flexible paths to enter or advance in the field. Many students are now exploring options such as the dnp program without clinical hours, which allows working professionals to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice without the time commitment of in-person training.

If you want to start your healthcare career quickly, accelerated programs are available. The 9 month lpn program is a fast-track option for those seeking to become Licensed Practical Nurses in under a year, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

For those focused on mental health, the shortest online pmhnp programs can lead to a specialized master’s degree and new career opportunities in psychiatric nursing, often with minimal on-campus requirements.

Cost is also a major factor for many students. The cheapest online health science degree options provide an affordable entry into the growing field of healthcare administration, giving you the credentials to work in management or support roles without excessive student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Spies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles