World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
37
Citations
7327
World Ranking
6721
National Ranking
482

Dieter Buhl publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Buhl sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 88 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Dieter Buhl D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Buhl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter Buhl is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular emphasis on multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Ecology, and Earth-Surface Processes.

Their work covers several main topics such as:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Karst Systems and Hydrogeology

Buhl has published research in journals including Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and The Depositional Record. Two recent papers are:

  • Controls on formation and alteration of early diagenetic dolomite: A multi-proxy δ44/40Ca, δ26Mg, δ18O and δ13C approach, 2020, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Petrographic and geochemical constraints on the formation of gravity-defying speleothems, 2022, The Depositional Record

Frequent coauthors in Buhl's research include Sylvia Riechelmann, Adrian Immenhauser, Vasileios Mavromatis, Martin Dietzel, and René Hoffmann. Collaborations have contributed to advancing topics related to geochemical proxies and sedimentary formations.

Best Publications

  • 87Sr/86Sr, δ13C and δ18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater

    Ján Veizer;Ján Veizer;Davin Ala;Karem Azmy;Peter Bruckschen

  • 87 Sr/ 86 Sr,δ 13 Candδ 18 Oevolution of Phanerozoic seawater

    Ján Veizer;Davin Ala;Karem Azmy;Peter Bruckschen

  • Strontium isotope stratigraphy: potential resolution and event correlation

    Ján Veizer;Ján Veizer;Dieter Buhl;Andreas Diener;Stefan Ebneth

  • Magnesium-isotope fractionation during low-Mg calcite precipitation in a limestone cave – Field study and experiments

    A. Immenhauser;D. Buhl;D. Richter;A. Niedermayr

  • The Nilgiri enderbites, South India: nature and age constraints on protolith formation, high-grade metamorphism and cooling history

    Michael M. Raith;C. Srikantappa;Dieter Buhl;Hermann Koehler

  • The magnesium isotope (δ26Mg) signature of dolomites

    Anna Geske;Robert H. Goldstein;Vasileios Mavromatis;Detlev K. Richter

  • Impact of diagenesis and low grade metamorphosis on isotope (δ26Mg, δ13C, δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr) and elemental (Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe and Sr) signatures of Triassic sabkha dolomites

    Anna Geske;J. Zorlu;Detlev Richter;Dieter Buhl

  • The strontium isotopic composition of Ordovician and Silurian brachiopods and conodonts: Relationships to geological events and implications for coeval seawater

    Hairuo Qing;Christopher R. Barnes;Dieter Buhl;Jan Veizer

  • The Sudbury Structure (Ontario, Canada): a tectonically deformed multi-ring impact basin

    A. Deutsch;R. A. F. Grieve;M. Avermann;L. Bischoff

  • Towards a better understanding of magnesium-isotope ratios from marine skeletal carbonates

    Dorothee Hippler;Dieter Buhl;Rob Witbaard;Detlev K. Richter

  • Strontium isotope stratigraphy of the Middle Devonian: Brachiopods and conodonts

    Andreas Diener;Stefan Ebneth;Ján Veizer;Ján Veizer;Dieter Buhl

  • Evolution of the oceanic calcium cycle during the late Mesozoic: Evidence from δ44/40Ca of marine skeletal carbonates

    Juraj Farkaš;Dieter Buhl;John Blenkinsop;Ján Veizer

  • High precision calcium isotope ratio measurements using a magnetic sector multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer

    Michael E. Wieser;Michael E. Wieser;Dieter Buhl;Claudia Bouman;Johannes Schwieters

  • Marine bivalve shell geochemistry and ultrastructure from modern low pH environments: environmental effect versus experimental bias

    Sabine Hahn;Riccardo Rodolfo-Metalpa;Erika Griesshaber;Wolfgang W Schmahl

  • Nature and Nurture: Environmental Isotope Story of the River Rhine

    D. Buhl;R. D. Neuser;D. K. Richter;D. Riedel

  • Time series δ26Mg analysis in speleothem calcite: Kinetic versus equilibrium fractionation, comparison with other proxies and implications for palaeoclimate research

    D. Buhl;A. Immenhauser;G. Smeulders;L. Kabiri

  • Catastrophic extinction of Caribbean rudist bivalves at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary

    Thomas Steuber;Simon F. Mitchell;Dieter Buhl;Gavin Gunter

  • The formation of the Sudbury Structure, Canada: Toward a unified impact model

    D. Stöffler;A. Deutsch;M. Avermann;L. Bischoff

  • Magnesium isotope composition of sabkha porewater and related (Sub-)Recent stoichiometric dolomites, Abu Dhabi (UAE)

    A. Geske;S. Lokier;M. Dietzel;D.K. Richter

  • Calcium-isotope fractionation in selected modern and ancient marine carbonates

    Thomas Steuber;Dieter Buhl

  • 87 Srr 86 Sr, d 13 C and d 18 O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater

    Jan Veizer;Davin Ala;Karem Azmy;Peter Bruckschen

  • The Sudbury Structure (Ontario, Canada): a tectonically deformed multi-ring impact basin

    A. Deutsch;R. A. F. Grieve;M. Avermann;L. Bischoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Immenhauser
Adrian Immenhauser Ruhr University Bochum
Vasileios Mavromatis
Vasileios Mavromatis Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ján Veizer
Ján Veizer University of Ottawa
Detlev K. Richter
Detlev K. Richter Ruhr University Bochum
Martin Dietzel
Martin Dietzel Graz University of Technology
Erika Griesshaber
Erika Griesshaber Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang W. Schmahl
Wolfgang W. Schmahl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jason M. Hall-Spencer
Jason M. Hall-Spencer Plymouth University
Karem Azmy
Karem Azmy Memorial University of Newfoundland
Harald Strauss
Harald Strauss University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to various interdisciplinary opportunities. For those interested in expanding language skills alongside their scientific expertise, programs like the online spanish bachelor degree for veterans provide flexible options tailored to diverse learners. This can be particularly useful for careers involving international environmental projects or community engagement.

Creative professionals looking to complement their Earth Science background might consider an online mfa degree, which offers specialized knowledge in the arts. This combination can lead to innovative roles such as scientific visualizations, environmental storytelling, or educational content creation.

For those aiming to move into leadership or organizational roles within scientific institutions or environmental firms, earning a human resource management masters degree online can be a strategic step. This degree equips professionals with skills in team management and organizational development, enhancing career advancement prospects.

Additionally, many adult learners and retirees are discovering the benefits of continuing education through online degrees for seniors. These programs provide opportunities to stay intellectually active and even transition into consulting or volunteer roles related to Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Dieter Buhl

Trending Scientists