World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Jean-Philippe Nicot publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Nicot sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Jean-Philippe Nicot D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Philippe Nicot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Jean-Philippe Nicot is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with notable contributions in subfields such as geophysics, mechanical engineering, mechanics of materials, ocean engineering, and geochemistry and petrology.

Their main research topics include hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, earthquake and tectonic studies, groundwater and isotope geochemistry, and geochemistry and elemental analysis.

Nicot has published extensively in a range of scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Applied Geochemistry
  • AAPG Bulletin
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Geochemical Exploration

Notable recent papers by Nicot cover various aspects of groundwater, environmental science, geophysics, and hydrology:

  • "The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle," 2024, Science
  • "Can we beneficially reuse produced water from oil and gas extraction in the U.S.?" 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Mobilization of Arsenic and Other Naturally Occurring Contaminants during Managed Aquifer Recharge: A Critical Review," 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Pore Pressure Threshold and Fault Slip Potential for Induced Earthquakes in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area of North Central Texas," 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Recent water disposal and pore pressure evolution in the Delaware Mountain Group, Delaware Basin, Southeast New Mexico and West Texas, USA," 2022, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies

Nicot has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Peter Hennings
  • Roxana Darvari
  • Katie Smye
  • Bridget R. Scanlon
  • J. Ge

Among Nicot's recognitions, they have been named a Fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.

    Jean-Philippe Nicot;Bridget R. Scanlon

  • The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle

    Unknown

  • Comparison of water use for hydraulic fracturing for unconventional oil and gas versus conventional oil.

    Bridget R Scanlon;Robert C Reedy;Jean P Nicot

  • Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin

    Jean-Philippe Nicot

  • Source and Fate of Hydraulic Fracturing Water in the Barnett Shale: A Historical Perspective

    Jean Philippe Nicot;Bridget R. Scanlon;Robert C. Reedy;Ruth A. Costley

  • Can we beneficially reuse produced water from oil and gas extraction in the U.S.

    Bridget R Scanlon;Robert C Reedy;Pei Xu;M Engle

  • Certification framework based on effective trapping for geologic carbon sequestration

    Curtis M. Oldenburg;Steven L. Bryant;Jean-Philippe Nicot

  • Static and dynamic reservoir modeling for geological CO2 sequestration at Cranfield, Mississippi, U.S.A.

    Seyyed Abolfazl Hosseini;Hamidreza Lashgari;Jong W. Choi;Jean-Philippe Nicot

  • Monitoring a large volume CO2 injection: Year two results from SECARB project at Denbury’s Cranfield, Mississippi, USA

    Susan D. Hovorka;Timothy A. Meckel;Ramon H. Trevino;Jiemin Lu

  • Elevated naturally occurring arsenic in a semiarid oxidizing system, Southern High Plains aquifer, Texas, USA

    B.R. Scanlon;J.P. Nicot;R.C. Reedy;D. Kurtzman

  • Will water scarcity in semiarid regions limit hydraulic fracturing of shale plays

    Bridget R Scanlon;Robert C Reedy;Jean Philippe Nicot

  • Brine flow up a well caused by pressure perturbation from geologic carbon sequestration: Static and dynamic evaluations

    Jens T. Birkholzer;Jean Philippe Nicot;Curtis M. Oldenburg;Quanlin Zhou

  • Mobilization of Arsenic and Other Naturally Occurring Contaminants during Managed Aquifer Recharge: A Critical Review

    Sarah Fakhreddine;Henning Prommer;Bridget R. Scanlon;Samantha C. Ying

  • Finding regional co-location patterns for sets of continuous variables in spatial datasets

    Christoph F. Eick;Rachana Parmar;Wei Ding;Tomasz F. Stepinski

  • Assessing leakage detectability at geologic CO2 sequestration sites using the probabilistic collocation method

    Alexander Y. Sun;Mehdi Zeidouni;Jean-Philippe Nicot;Zhiming Lu

  • Single-well push–pull test for assessing potential impacts of CO2 leakage on groundwater quality in a shallow Gulf Coast aquifer in Cranfield, Mississippi

    Changbing Yang;Patrick J. Mickler;Robert Reedy;Bridget R. Scanlon

  • Inversion of pressure anomaly data for detecting leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites

    Alexander Y. Sun;Jean-Philippe Nicot

  • Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: Area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces

    Jean-Philippe Nicot;Curtis M. Oldenburg;Steven L. Bryant;Susan D. Hovorka

  • A survey of oil and gas wells in the Texas Gulf Coast, USA, and implications for geological sequestration of CO2

    Jean-Philippe Nicot

  • Common attributes of hydraulically fractured oil and gas production and CO2 geological sequestration

    Jean-Philippe Nicot;Ian J. Duncan

  • Methane Sources and Migration Mechanisms in Shallow Groundwaters in Parker and Hood Counties, Texas-A Heavy Noble Gas Analysis.

    Tao Wen;M. Clara Castro;Jean-Philippe Nicot;Chris M. Hall

  • Enhanced CO2 Storage and Sequestration in Deep Saline Aquifers by Nanoparticles: Commingled Disposal of Depleted Uranium and CO2

    Farzam Javadpour;Jean-Philippe Nicot

  • Risk Assessment for future CO2 Sequestration Projects Based CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery in the U.S.

    Ian J. Duncan;Jean-Philippe Nicot;Jong-Won Choi

  • Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: Area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces

    J.-P. Nicot

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan D. Hovorka
Susan D. Hovorka The University of Texas at Austin
Bridget R. Scanlon
Bridget R. Scanlon The University of Texas at Austin
Curtis M. Oldenburg
Curtis M. Oldenburg Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Robert C. Reedy
Robert C. Reedy The University of Texas at Austin
Steven L. Bryant
Steven L. Bryant University of Calgary
Alexander Y. Sun
Alexander Y. Sun The University of Texas at Austin
Chris M. Hall
Chris M. Hall University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jens Birkholzer
Jens Birkholzer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Christine Doughty
Christine Doughty Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
James E. Saiers
James E. Saiers Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but many professionals also consider complementary fields to enhance their expertise. For example, exploring online masters programs in human resource management can be beneficial for Earth Scientists interested in leadership roles within environmental organizations or research teams.

For those looking for flexible and accelerated study options, especially mature students or career changers, one year degrees for seniors offer streamlined pathways to build new skills or gain certifications relevant to Earth Science industries.

Additionally, combining Earth Science knowledge with expertise in information management can lead to specialized roles in data analysis and archiving. Accredited programs like ala mlis programs and traditional degree in library science equip students with skills in organizing scientific information crucial for research and policy development.

These interdisciplinary pathways demonstrate the value of complementary online degrees to enrich an Earth Science career, enhancing both knowledge and employability in a dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Philippe Nicot

Trending Scientists