World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
12819
World Ranking
6253
National Ranking
2255

James M. Lazorchak publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Lazorchak sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

James M. Lazorchak D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Lazorchak sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Lazorchak is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their scholarly output focuses on several subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, and Oceanography.

Their research addresses multiple topics such as Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Marine Toxins and Detection Methods, Animal Testing and Alternatives, Water Quality and Pollution Assessment, and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with James M. Lazorchak include Alex T. Ford, Marlene Ågerstrand, Bryan W. Brooks, Tomas Brodin, and Minna Saaristo.

Regular publication venues featuring their work are Water, The Science of The Total Environment, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University), Environmental Science & Technology, and Freshwater Biology.

Recent papers associated with James M. Lazorchak include:

  • The Role of Behavioral Ecotoxicology in Environmental Protection, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Toxic benthic freshwater cyanobacterial proliferations: Challenges and solutions for enhancing knowledge and improving monitoring and mitigation, 2020, Freshwater Biology
  • Determination of Cyanotoxins and Prymnesins in Water, Fish Tissue, and Other Matrices: A Review, 2022, Toxins
  • EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies, 2024, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Development of a Risk Characterization Tool for Harmful Cyanobacteria Blooms on the Ohio River, 2022, Water

Best Publications

  • Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen

    Karen A. Kidd;Paul J. Blanchfield;Kenneth H. Mills;Vince P. Palace

  • Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?

    Alistair B. A. Boxall;Murray A. Rudd;Bryan W. Brooks;Daniel J. Caldwell

  • Management Options for Reducing the Release of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes to the Environment

    Amy Pruden;D.G. Joakim Larsson;Alejandro Amézquita;Peter Collignon

  • Are harmful algal blooms becoming the greatest inland water quality threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems

    Bryan W. Brooks;James M. Lazorchak;Meredith D.A. Howard;Mari Vaughn V. Johnson

  • Concentrations of prioritized pharmaceuticals in effluents from 50 large wastewater treatment plants in the US and implications for risk estimation

    Mitchell S. Kostich;Angela L. Batt;James M. Lazorchak

  • HEAVY METALS STRUCTURE BENTHIC COMMUNITIES IN COLORADO MOUNTAIN STREAMS

    William H. Clements;Daren M. Carlisle;James M. Lazorchak;Philip C. Johnson

  • Saving freshwater from salts

    M. Cañedo-Argüelles;M. Cañedo-Argüelles;C. P. Hawkins;B. J. Kefford;R. B. Schäfer

  • Analysis of ecologically relevant pharmaceuticals in wastewater and surface water using selective solid-phase extraction and UPLC-MS/MS.

    Angela L. Batt;Mitch S. Kostich;James M. Lazorchak

  • Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Fish: Developing Exposure Indicators and Predictive Models of Effects Based on Mechanism of Action

    Gerald T. Ankley;David C. Bencic;Michael S. Breen;Timothy W. Collette

  • Ecotoxicological assessment of antibiotics: A call for improved consideration of microorganisms.

    Kristian K. Brandt;Alejandro Amézquita;Thomas Backhaus;Alistair B. Boxall

  • Risks to aquatic organisms posed by human pharmaceutical use

    Mitchell S. Kostich;James M. Lazorchak

  • Identification of metabolites of trenbolone acetate in androgenic runoff from a beef feedlot.

    Elizabeth J. Durhan;Christy S. Lambright;Elizabeth A. Makynen;James Lazorchak

  • The potential of an earthworm avoidance test for evaluation of hazardous waste sites

    Roger B. Yeardley;Laura C. Gast;James M. Lazorchak

  • Differential Gene Expression in Daphnia magna Suggests Distinct Modes of Action and Bioavailability for ZnO Nanoparticles and Zn Ions

    Helen C. Poynton;James M. Lazorchak;Christopher A. Impellitteri;Mark E. Smith

  • Toxicogenomic responses of nanotoxicity in Daphnia magna exposed to silver nitrate and coated silver nanoparticles.

    Helen C. Poynton;James M. Lazorchak;Christopher A. Impellitteri;Bonnie J. Blalock

  • The role of behavioral ecotoxicology in environmental protection

    Alex T. Ford;Marlene Ågerstrand;Bryan W. Brooks;Bryan W. Brooks;Joel Allen

  • Effects from filtration, capping agents, and presence/absence of food on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Daphnia magna

    H. Joel Allen;Christopher A. Impellitteri;Dana A. Macke;J. Lee Heckman

  • Toxic benthic freshwater cyanobacterial proliferations: Challenges and solutions for enhancing knowledge and improving monitoring and mitigation

    Susanna A. Wood;Laura T. Kelly;Keith Bouma-Gregson;Jean François Humbert

  • Presence of pharmaceuticals in fish collected from urban rivers in the U.S. EPA 2008-2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment.

    Belinda Huerta;Sara Rodriguez-Mozaz;Jim Lazorchak;Damia Barcelo

  • Zooplankton Assemblage Responses to Disturbance Gradients

    Richard S. Stemberger;James M. Lazorchak

  • A reformulated, reconstituted water for testing the freshwater amphipod, Hyalella azteca

    Mark E. Smith;James M. Lazorchak;Lori E. Herrin;Sandra Brewer-Swartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency
Daniel L. Villeneuve
Daniel L. Villeneuve Environmental Protection Agency
Bryan W. Brooks
Bryan W. Brooks Baylor University
Brian H. Hill
Brian H. Hill University of Minnesota
Edward Topp
Edward Topp Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Alistair B.A. Boxall
Alistair B.A. Boxall University of York
D. G. Joakim Larsson
D. G. Joakim Larsson University of Gothenburg
David B. Buchwalter
David B. Buchwalter North Carolina State University
Euan D. Reavie
Euan D. Reavie University of Minnesota, Duluth
Nancy D. Denslow
Nancy D. Denslow University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that intersect with many disciplines. For those interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, exploring top gis masters programs can provide specialized skills vital for resource management and urban planning.

Public policy and administration also play a crucial role in environmental decision-making. Earning a degree through the best online masters in public administration can prepare graduates to influence environmental policies and manage sustainability initiatives effectively.

Understanding societal impacts and behaviors concerning the environment is key, and an accredited online bachelors in sociology can complement environmental studies by providing insights into human-environment interactions.

For professionals aiming to advance research or academic careers, pursuing advanced credentials is essential. Consider exploring online doctoral programs without dissertation to further knowledge without the traditional dissertation barrier, offering flexibility in achieving your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Lazorchak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles