World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
107
Citations
45884
World Ranking
236
National Ranking
16

Charles R. Tyler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 387 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Charles R. Tyler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles R. Tyler is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with extensive work in subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Ecology, Immunology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, notably Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Aquaculture disease management and microbiota, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species, Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications, and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Charles R. Tyler include:

  • Anke Lange
  • A. Ross Brown
  • Ben Temperton
  • Matthew J. Winter
  • David Bass

Publication venues where Tyler has frequently contributed are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Tyler include:

  • Sustainable aquaculture through the One Health lens, 2020, Nature Food
  • Probiotics and competitive exclusion of pathogens in shrimp aquaculture, 2020, Reviews in Aquaculture
  • Frontiers in quantifying wildlife behavioural responses to chemical pollution, 2022, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • How do abiotic environmental conditions influence shrimp susceptibility to disease? A critical analysis focussed on White Spot Disease, 2020, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
  • Global variation in freshwater physico-chemistry and its influence on chemical toxicity in aquatic wildlife, 2021, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Best Publications

  • Widespread Sexual Disruption in Wild Fish

    Susan Jobling;Monique Nolan;Charles R. Tyler;Geoff Brighty

  • Estrogenic Effects of Effluents from Sewage Treatment Works

    C. E. Purdom;P. A. Hardiman;V. V. J. Bye;N. C. Eno

  • Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment.

    Julia Fabrega;Samuel N. Luoma;Charles R. Tyler;Tamara S. Galloway

  • Endocrine Disruption in Wildlife: A Critical Review of the Evidence

    C R Tyler;S Jobling;J P Sumpter

  • A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife.

    Jörg Oehlmann;Ulrike Schulte-Oehlmann;Werner Kloas;Oana Jagnytsch

  • Egg quality in fish: what makes a good egg?

    Suzanne Brooks;Charles R. Tyler;John P. Sumpter

  • Uptake and retention of microplastics by the shore crab Carcinus maenas.

    Andrew James Russell Watts;Ceri Lewis;Rhys M. Goodhead;Stephen J. Beckett

  • Long-term exposure to environmental concentrations of the pharmaceutical ethynylestradiol causes reproductive failure in fish.

    Unknown

  • Predicted exposures to steroid estrogens in U.K. rivers correlate with widespread sexual disruption in wild fish populations.

    Susan Jobling;Richard Williams;Andrew Johnson;Ayesha Taylor

  • Pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: a critical review of the evidence for health effects in fish.

    Jenna Corcoran;Matthew J Winter;Charles R Tyler

  • Relative potencies and combination effects of steroidal estrogens in fish.

    Karen L. Thorpe;Rob I. Cummings;Thomas H. Hutchinson;Martin Scholze

  • Comparative responses of molluscs and fish to environmental estrogens and an estrogenic effluent

    S Jobling;D Casey;T Rodgers-Gray;J Oehlmann

  • Wild Intersex Roach (Rutilus rutilus) Have Reduced Fertility

    Susan Jobling;S Coey;J G Whitmore;D E Kime

  • Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis

    Richard D. Handy;Theodore B. Henry;Tessa M. Scown;Blair D. Johnston

  • Impacts of 17β-estradiol, including environmentally relevant concentrations, on reproduction after exposure during embryo-larval-, juvenile- and adult-life stages in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    François Brion;C.R. Tyler;Xavier Palazzi;B. Laillet

  • Impacts of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on marine organisms.

    Tony J. Baker;Charles R. Tyler;Tamara S. Galloway

  • Acute Toxicity, Teratogenic, and Estrogenic Effects of Bisphenol A and Its Alternative Replacements Bisphenol S, Bisphenol F, and Bisphenol AF in Zebrafish Embryo-Larvae

    John Moreman;Okhyun Lee;Maciej Trznadel;Arthur David

  • Reproductive effects of long-term exposure to Bisphenol A in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas).

    P. Sohoni;C. R. Tyler;K. Hurd;J. Caunter

  • Microplastic ingestion by riverine macroinvertebrates.

    Fredric M. Windsor;Fredric M. Windsor;Rosie M. Tilley;Charles R. Tyler;Steve J. Ormerod

  • Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment?

    T M Scown;R van Aerle;C R Tyler

  • Effects of Aqueous Exposure to Silver Nanoparticles of Different Sizes in Rainbow Trout

    Tessa M. Scown;Eduarda M. Santos;Blair D. Johnston;Birgit Gaiser

  • Long-Term Temporal Changes in the Estrogenic Composition of Treated Sewage Effluent and Its Biological Effects on Fish

    Trevor P. Rodgers-Gray;Susan Jobling;Steven Morris;Carole Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

John P. Sumpter
John P. Sumpter Brunel University London
Susan Jobling
Susan Jobling Brunel University London
Taisen Iguchi
Taisen Iguchi National Institute for Basic Biology
Jamie R. Lead
Jamie R. Lead University of South Carolina
Tamara S. Galloway
Tamara S. Galloway University of Exeter
Jamie R. Stevens
Jamie R. Stevens University of Exeter
Teresa F. Fernandes
Teresa F. Fernandes Heriot-Watt University
Peter Kille
Peter Kille Cardiff University
Darren P. Croft
Darren P. Croft University of Exeter
Mohammed Baalousha
Mohammed Baalousha University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, often complemented by related fields such as sociology and education. For those interested in understanding societal impacts of environmental policies, pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors can provide valuable insights into human behavior and social structures.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise in education with a focus on sustainability or environmental curricula, exploring education doctoral programs without dissertation requirement offers a streamlined path to doctoral success, often balancing work and study more effectively.

Similarly, accredited programs like those listed under accredited eds to edd programs provide pathways for educators seeking leadership roles, often integrating environmental education components.

For social work professionals focused on environmental justice and community health, affordable options such as the cheapest dsw program make advanced social work degrees more accessible, enabling them to tackle complex social-environmental challenges.

Incorporating these related online degrees can enrich an Environmental Sciences career, offering holistic perspectives and expanding job market potential.

Best Scientists Citing Charles R. Tyler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles