World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
4789
World Ranking
6707
National Ranking
171

Tomas Lundmark publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomas Lundmark sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tomas Lundmark D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomas Lundmark sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tomas Lundmark is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden and has a research focus that intersects environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work addresses topics related to forest ecology, biodiversity, management, and the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems.

The core fields of study within their research include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, the subfields of study they emphasize are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Insect Science
  • Ecology
  • Soil Science

The main topics of their scientific contributions cover:

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Tomas Lundmark has a significant publication record with recent notable papers including:

  • "Managing existing forests can mitigate climate change," 2022, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "On the role of forests and the forest sector for climate change mitigation in Sweden," 2022, GCB Bioenergy
  • "Low and High Nitrogen Deposition Rates in Northern Coniferous Forests Have Different Impacts on Aboveground Litter Production, Soil Respiration, and Soil Carbon Stocks," 2020, Ecosystems
  • "The Net Landscape Carbon Balance-Integrating terrestrial and aquatic carbon fluxes in a managed boreal forest landscape in Sweden," 2020, Global Change Biology
  • "Landscape-variability of the carbon balance across managed boreal forests," 2022, Global Change Biology

Their frequent co-authorship includes collaborations with:

  • Matthias Peichl
  • Mats B. Nilsson
  • Hjalmar Laudon
  • Hyungwoo Lim
  • Jörgen Wallerman

The preferred publication venues for Tomas Lundmark span journals focused on forestry, ecology, and environmental change, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Global Change Biology
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Best Publications

  • The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review.

    Ritta Hyvönen;Goran I. Agren;Sune Linder;Tryggve Persson

  • The effect of water and nutrient availability on the productivity of Norway spruce in northern and southern Sweden

    Johan Bergh;Sune Linder;Tomas Lundmark;Björn Elfving

  • High temporal resolution tracing of photosynthate carbon from the tree canopy to forest soil microorganisms

    Peter Högberg;M N Högberg;S G Göttlicher;N R Betson

  • Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden

    Adam Felton;Urban Nilsson;Johan Sonesson;Annika M. Felton

  • Potential Roles of Swedish Forestry in the Context of Climate Change Mitigation

    Tomas Lundmark;Johan Bergh;Peter Hofer;Anders Lundström

  • The influence of soil temperature on transpiration: a plot scale manipulation in a young Scots pine stand

    Per-Erik Mellander;Kevin Bishop;Tomas Lundmark

  • Socio-ecological implications of modifying rotation lengths in forestry

    Jean-Michel Roberge;Hjalmar Laudon;Christer Björkman;Thomas Ranius

  • Thinning of Scots pine and Norway spruce monocultures in Sweden

    Urban Nilsson;Eric Agestam;Per-Magnus Ekö;Björn Elfving

  • Effects of frost on shaded and exposed spruce and pine seedlings planted in the field

    Tomas Lundmark;Jan-Erik Hällgren

  • Inter-annual variability of precipitation constrains the production response of boreal Pinus sylvestris to nitrogen fertilization

    Hyungwoo Lim;Ram Oren;Ram Oren;Sari Palmroth;Sari Palmroth;Pantana Tor-ngern

  • Seasonal variation of maximum photochemical efficiency in boreal Norway spruce stands

    Tomas Lundmark;Johan Bergh;Martin Strand;Andres Koppel

  • Managing existing forests can mitigate climate change

    Unknown

  • Functions for Biomass Estimation of Young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. from Stands in Northern Sweden with High Stand Densities

    Svante Claesson;Kenneth Sahlén;Tomas Lundmark

  • Recovery from winter depression of photosynthesis in pine and spruce

    Tomas Lundmark;Jonas Hedén;Jan-Erik Hällgren

  • On the role of forests and the forest sector for climate change mitigation in Sweden

    Unknown

  • Comparison of carbon balances between continuous-cover and clear-cut forestry in Sweden.

    Tomas Lundmark;Johan Bergh;Annika Nordin;Nils Fahlvik

  • The role of biogeochemical hotspots, landscape heterogeneity, and hydrological connectivity for minimizing forestry effects on water quality.

    Hjalmar Laudon;Lenka Kuglerová;Ryan A. Sponseller;Martyn Futter

  • Effects of low night temperature and light on chlorophyll fluorescence of field-grown seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).

    M. Strand;T. Lundmark

  • Impacts of seasonal air and soil temperatures on photosynthesis in Scots pine trees.

    Martin Strand;Tomas Lundmark;Ingrid Söderbergh;Per-Erik Mellander

  • Effects of frequency of fertilisation on production, foliar chemistry and nutrient leaching in young Norway spruce stands in Sweden.

    Johan Bergh;Urban Nilsson;Harald Grip;Per-Ola Hedwall

  • Photosynthesis of Scots pine in the field after night frosts during summer

    J.-E. Hällgren;T. Lundmark;M. Strand

  • Low and High Nitrogen Deposition Rates in Northern Coniferous Forests Have Different Impacts on Aboveground Litter Production, Soil Respiration, and Soil Carbon Stocks

    Benjamin Forsmark;Annika Nordin;Nadia I. Maaroufi;Nadia I. Maaroufi;Tomas Lundmark

  • Frost heaving in a boreal soil in relation to soil scarification and snow cover

    Urban Bergsten;Tomas Lundmark;Mikaell Ottosson Löfvenius

  • Boreal forest biomass accumulation is not increased by two decades of soil warming

    Hyungwoo Lim;Ram Oren;Ram Oren;Torgny Näsholm;Monika Strömgren

  • Apparent winter CO2 uptake by a boreal forest due to decoupling

    Georg Jocher;Mikaell ->Ottosson Löfvenius;Giuseppe De Simon;Thomas Hörnlund

  • The potential role of forest management in Swedish scenarios towards climate neutrality by mid century

    Olivia Cintas;Göran Berndes;Julia Hansson;Bishnu Chandra Poudel

Frequent Co-Authors

Annika Nordin
Annika Nordin Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Johan Bergh
Johan Bergh Linnaeus University
Sune Linder
Sune Linder Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Torgny Näsholm
Torgny Näsholm Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Urban Nilsson
Urban Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Adam Felton
Adam Felton Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
John D. Marshall
John D. Marshall University of Gothenburg
Matthias Peichl
Matthias Peichl Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Mats Nilsson
Mats Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse and meaningful career opportunities. Many students combine this field with allied disciplines to broaden their job prospects or specialize their expertise. Thanks to growing online education options in the U.S., it's never been easier to expand your qualifications from wherever you are.

For those interested in understanding animal or human behavior, an clinical psychology degree online offers valuable skills that complement ecological research. If your focus leans toward community work or social impact, consider advancing your career with a masters in human services online; this credential is ideal for those seeking quick entry into human services roles.

Interested in pivoting to a new profession? If you have a teaching background, it’s worth exploring how can a teacher become a speech pathologist. Cross-disciplinary moves like these are increasingly common as online programs offer flexible pathways.

Finally, the built environment influences ecosystems too. Merging ecological training with design, you might consider becoming an architect through a architect online degree. The intersection of architecture and environmental science opens up roles in sustainable development from urban planning to green infrastructure design.

Best Scientists Citing Tomas Lundmark

Trending Scientists