World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 71 684 631 10 9 180 16235

Torgny Näsholm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Torgny Näsholm between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Torgny Näsholm published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 7 of the 202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Torgny Näsholm: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 3
2000 1
2001 10
2002 5
2003 6
2004 4
2005 3
2006 3
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 4
2011 7
2012 5
2013 5
2014 9
2015 8
2016 10
2017 17
2018 6
2019 6
2020 7
2021 19
2022 7
2023 9
2024 6
2025 6
2026 1
Total 202
Download as CSV

Torgny Näsholm publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torgny Näsholm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 176–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 180 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126 180
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Torgny Näsholm D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torgny Näsholm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47 71
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Torgny Näsholm is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden and has contributed extensively to research in agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science. Their work spans various subfields including plant science, global and planetary change, soil science, nature and landscape conservation, and insect science.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas such as plant water relations and carbon dynamics, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions, tree-ring climate responses, plant nutrient uptake and metabolism, and seedling growth and survival studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Näsholm include:

  • John D. Marshall
  • Hyungwoo Lim
  • Nils Henriksson
  • Oskar Franklin
  • Matthias Peichl

The scientist has published in a variety of journals, with notable recurring venues being:

  • New Phytologist
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Tree Physiology
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • Geoderma

Some of Näsholm's recent papers include:

  • "Re-examining the evidence for the mother tree hypothesis - resource sharing among trees via ectomycorrhizal networks," 2023, New Phytologist
  • "Microdialysis in soil environments: Current practice and future perspectives," 2020, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • "Decadal nitrogen addition alters chemical composition of soil organic matter in a boreal forest," 2021, Geoderma
  • "Mother trees, altruistic fungi, and the perils of plant personification," 2023, Trends in Plant Science
  • "Biohybrid plants with electronic roots via in vivo polymerization of conjugated oligomers," 2021, Materials Horizons

Best Publications

  • Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants.

    Torgny Näsholm;Knut Kielland;Ulrika Ganeteg

  • Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen

    Torgny Näsholm;Alf Ekblad;Annika Nordin;Reiner Giesler

  • The unexpected versatility of plants: organic nitrogen use and availability in terrestrial ecosystems.

    David Lipson;Torgny Näsholm

  • Quantification of effects of season and nitrogen supply on tree below-ground carbon transfer to ectomycorrhizal fungi and other soil organisms in a boreal pine forest.

    Mona N. Högberg;Maria J. I. Briones;Maria J. I. Briones;Sonja G. Keel;Daniel B. Metcalfe

  • High temporal resolution tracing of photosynthate carbon from the tree canopy to forest soil microorganisms

    Peter Högberg;M N Högberg;S G Göttlicher;N R Betson

  • Soil nitrogen form and plant nitrogen uptake along a boreal forest productivity gradient

    Annika Nordin;Peter Högberg;Torgny Näsholm

  • Are ectomycorrhizal fungi alleviating or aggravating nitrogen limitation of tree growth in boreal forests

    Torgny Näsholm;Torgny Näsholm;Peter Högberg;Oskar Franklin;Daniel Metcalfe

  • UPTAKE OF ORGANIC NITROGEN IN THE FIELD BY FOUR AGRICULTURALLY IMPORTANT PLANT SPECIES

    Torgny Näsholm;Kerstin Huss-Danell;Peter Högberg

  • Knowledge gaps in soil carbon and nitrogen interactions – From molecular to global scale

    Annemieke I. Gärdenäs;Göran I. Ågren;Jeffrey A. Bird;Marianne Clarholm

  • Tamm Review: On the nature of the nitrogen limitation to plant growth in Fennoscandian boreal forests

    Peter Högberg;Torgny Näsholm;Oskar Franklin;Oskar Franklin;Mona N. Högberg

  • Nitrogen deposition and the biodiversity of boreal forests: implications for the nitrogen critical load.

    Annika Nordin;Joachim Strengbom;Johanna Witzell;Torgny Näsholm

  • A conditional marker gene allowing both positive and negative selection in plants.

    Oskar Erikson;Magnus Hertzberg;Torgny Näsholm

  • Comprehensive Screening of Arabidopsis Mutants Suggests the Lysine Histidine Transporter 1 to Be Involved in Plant Uptake of Amino Acids

    Henrik Svennerstam;Ulrika Ganeteg;Catherine Bellini;Torgny Näsholm

  • Slow recovery of boreal forest ecosystem following decreased nitrogen input

    J Strengbom;A Nordin;T Nasholm;Lars Ericson

  • Forests trapped in nitrogen limitation--an ecological market perspective on ectomycorrhizal symbiosis.

    Oskar Franklin;Torgny Näsholm;Peter Högberg;Mona N. Högberg

  • The below‐ground perspective of forest plants: soil provides mainly organic nitrogen for plants and mycorrhizal fungi

    Erich Inselsbacher;Torgny Näsholm

  • Root uptake of cationic amino acids by Arabidopsis depends on functional expression of amino acid permease 5

    Henrik Svennerstam;Ulrika Ganeteg;Torgny Näsholm

  • Amino acid uptake: a widespread ability among boreal forest plants

    Jörgen Persson;Torgny Näsholm

  • Nitrogen isotope fractionation during nitrogen uptake by ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris

    Peter Högberg;Mona N. Högberg;Maud E. Quist;Alf Ekblad

  • Turning the Table: Plants Consume Microbes as a Source of Nutrients

    Chanyarat Paungfoo-Lonhienne;Doris Rentsch;Silke Robatzek;Richard I. Webb

  • Seasonal changes in amino acids, protein and total nitrogen in needles of fertilized Scots pine trees

    T. Näsholm;A. Ericsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Högberg
Peter Högberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University
Sune Linder
Sune Linder Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Annika Nordin
Annika Nordin Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Sari Palmroth
Sari Palmroth Duke University
John D. Marshall
John D. Marshall University of Gothenburg
Tomas Lundmark
Tomas Lundmark Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Susanne Schmidt
Susanne Schmidt University of Bonn
Vaughan Hurry
Vaughan Hurry Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Kristin Palmqvist
Kristin Palmqvist Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Torgny Näsholm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles