World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 39 4148 3881 1033 925 82 5961
Environmental Sciences 40 8065 7751 2887 2689 87 6476

Sari Palmroth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sari Palmroth between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sari Palmroth published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2013. 10 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2013. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1997 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sari Palmroth: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 7
2010 4
2011 6
2012 3
2013 8
2014 8
2015 6
2016 4
2017 5
2018 4
2019 4
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
2024 5
2025 5
Total 95
Download as CSV

Sari Palmroth publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sari Palmroth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–85 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 82 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199 82
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Sari Palmroth D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sari Palmroth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229 39
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Sari Palmroth is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and conducts research primarily in Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans several interconnected subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, Plant Science, and Ecology.

The main research topics addressed by Palmroth involve Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Tree-ring Climate Responses, Forest Ecology and Management, Plant Responses to Elevated CO2, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics.

Recent publications by Palmroth cover various aspects of plant and forest ecology. These include:

  • The response of coarse root biomass to long-term CO2 enrichment and nitrogen application in a maturing Pinus taeda stand with a large broadleaved component, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Extramatrical mycelial biomass is mediated by fine root mass and ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition across tree species, 2024, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Overlooked branch turnover creates a widespread bias in forest carbon accounting, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Increased leaf area index and efficiency drive enhanced production under elevated atmospheric CO2 in a pine-dominated stand showing no progressive nitrogen limitation, 2024, Global Change Biology
  • Similar response of canopy conductance to increasing vapor pressure deficit and decreasing soil conductivity with drought among five morphologically contrasting but co-occurring pine species, 2025, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Frequent coauthors connected with Palmroth's research include Ram Oren, Chris A. Maier, Jean-Christophe Domec, Dohyoung Kim, and Chainey A. Boroski.

Palmroth's research is published in several scientific venues frequently used in ecological and environmental sciences. These venues include Global Change Biology, SSRN Electronic Journal, The Science of The Total Environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

Best Publications

  • Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long‐term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2

    John E. Drake;Anne Gallet-Budynek;Anne Gallet-Budynek;Kirsten S. Hofmockel;Emily S. Bernhardt

  • Observations of ultrafine aerosol particle formation and growth in boreal forest

    J. M. Mäkelä;P. Aalto;V. Jokinen;T. Pohja

  • A stomatal optimization theory to describe the effects of atmospheric CO2 on leaf photosynthesis and transpiration

    Gabriel Katul;Stefano Manzoni;Sari Palmroth;Ram Oren

  • Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO2‐enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange

    Gabriel G. Katul;Sari Palmroth;Ram Oren

  • Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates

    Stefano Manzoni;Giulia Vico;Gabriel Katul;Philip A. Fay

  • Hydraulic limits on maximum plant transpiration and the emergence of the safety–efficiency trade‐off

    Stefano Manzoni;Giulia Vico;Gabriel Katul;Sari Palmroth;Sari Palmroth

  • Long-term field measurements of atmosphere-surface interactions in boreal forest combining forest ecology, micrometeorology, aerosol physics and atmospheric chemistry

    Timo Vesala;Jyrki Haataja;Pasi Pekka Aalto;Nuria Altimir

  • Interannual Invariability of Forest Evapotranspiration and Its Consequence to Water Flow Downstream

    A. Christopher Oishi;Ram Oren;Kimberly A. Novick;Sari Palmroth

  • Acclimation of leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated CO2 (free-air CO2 enrichment) and N-fertilization

    Jean‐Christophe Domec;Jean‐Christophe Domec;Sari Palmroth;Eric Ward;Chris A. Maier

  • A test of the hydraulic vulnerability segmentation hypothesis in angiosperm and conifer tree species

    Daniel M. Johnson;Remi Wortemann;Katherine A. McCulloh;Lionel Jordan-Meille

  • Elevated CO2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE

    David S Ellsworth;Richard Thomas;Kristine Y Crous;Sari Palmroth

  • Effects of stomatal delays on the economics of leaf gas exchange under intermittent light regimes.

    Giulia Vico;Stefano Manzoni;Sari Palmroth;Gabriel Katul

  • Aboveground sink strength in forests controls the allocation of carbon below ground and its (CO 2 )-induced enhancement

    Sari Palmroth;Ram Oren;Heather R. McCarthy;Kurt H. Johnsen

  • Physiological responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings to drought stress

    Lubica Ditmarová;Daniel Kurjak;Sari Palmroth;Jaroslav Kmet

  • Contrasting responses to drought of forest floor CO 2 efflux in a Loblolly pine plantation and a nearby Oak-Hickory forest

    S. Palmroth;S. Palmroth;Chris A. Maier;Heather R. McCarthy;A. C. Oishi

  • Optimization of stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under dynamic soil moisture

    Stefano Manzoni;Stefano Manzoni;Giulia Vico;Sari Palmroth;Sari Palmroth;Amilcare Michele M. Porporato

  • The carbon bonus of organic nitrogen enhances nitrogen use efficiency of plants

    Oskar Franklin;Oskar Franklin;Camila Aguetoni Cambui;Linda Gruffman;Sari Palmroth

  • Short-term response of soil respiration to nitrogen fertilization in a subtropical evergreen forest

    Qiang Gao;Niles J. Hasselquist;Sari Palmroth;Zemei Zheng

  • Inter-annual variability of precipitation constrains the production response of boreal Pinus sylvestris to nitrogen fertilization

    Hyungwoo Lim;Ram Oren;Ram Oren;Sari Palmroth;Sari Palmroth;Pantana Tor-ngern

  • Structural adaptation rather than water conservation was observed in Scots pine over a range of wet to dry climates

    S. Palmroth;F. Berninger;E. Nikinmaa;J. Lloyd

  • Are ecosystem carbon inputs and outputs coupled at short time scales? A case study from adjacent pine and hardwood forests using impulse-response analysis.

    Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy;Sari Palmroth;A. Christopher Oishi;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira

  • Leaf Stomatal Responses to Vapour Pressure Deficit Under Current and CO2- Enriched Atmosphere Explained by the Economics of gas Exchange

    S. Palmroth;G. G. Katul;R. Oren

Frequent Co-Authors

Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University
Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Heather R. McCarthy
Heather R. McCarthy University of Oklahoma
Stefano Manzoni
Stefano Manzoni Stockholm University
Giulia Vico
Giulia Vico Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Torgny Näsholm
Torgny Näsholm Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Chris A. Maier
Chris A. Maier US Forest Service
Amilcare Porporato
Amilcare Porporato Princeton University
Pertti Hari
Pertti Hari University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sari Palmroth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles