World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
32
Citations
4897
World Ranking
5879
National Ranking
1422

Chris A. Maier publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris A. Maier sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 71 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Chris A. Maier D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris A. Maier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO 2 -enriched atmosphere

    Ram Oren;David S Ellsworth;David S Ellsworth;Kurt H Johnsen;Nathan C. Phillips

  • Soil CO2 evolution and root respiration in 11 year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations as affected by moisture and nutrient availability

    Chris A. Maier;L.W. Kress

  • Acclimation of leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated CO2 (free-air CO2 enrichment) and N-fertilization

    Jean‐Christophe Domec;Jean‐Christophe Domec;Sari Palmroth;Eric Ward;Chris A. Maier

  • Elevated CO2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE

    David S Ellsworth;Richard Thomas;Kristine Y Crous;Sari Palmroth

  • Respiratory carbon use and carbon storage in mid-rotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations: the effect of site resources on the stand carbon balance

    Chris A. Maier;Timothy J. Albaugh;H. Lee Allen;Phillip M. Dougherty

  • Meeting global policy commitments: carbon sequestration and southern pine forests

    Kurt H. Johnsen;David N. Wear;R. Oren;R.O. Teskey

  • Contrasting responses to drought of forest floor CO 2 efflux in a Loblolly pine plantation and a nearby Oak-Hickory forest

    S. Palmroth;S. Palmroth;Chris A. Maier;Heather R. McCarthy;A. C. Oishi

  • Effects of temperature and tissue nitrogen on dormant season stem and branch maintenance respiration in a young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation.

    Chris A. Maier;Stanley J. Zarnoch;P.M. Dougherty

  • Stem growth and respiration in loblolly pine plantations differing in soil resource availability

    Chris A. Maier

  • Short‐term effects of fertilization on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) physiology

    C.M. Gough;J.R. Seiler;Chris A. Maier

  • Interaction of ice storms and management practices on current carbon sequestration in forests with potential mitigation under future CO2 atmosphere

    Heather R. McCarthy;Ram Oren;Hyun-Seok Kim;Kurt H. Johnsen

  • Modelling the limits on the response of net carbon exchange to fertilization in a south-eastern pine forest

    C.-T. Lai;G. Katul;J. Butnor;M. Siqueira

  • Physiological girdling of pine trees via phloem chilling: proof of concept.

    Kurt Johnsen;Chris Maier;Felipe Sanchez;Peter Anderson

  • Relationship between stem CO2 efflux, stem sap velocity and xylem CO2 concentration in young loblolly pine trees.

    Chris A. Maier;Barton D. Clinton

  • Fertilization effects on forest carbon storage and exchange, and net primary production: A new hybrid process model for stand management.

    D.A. Sampson;R.H. Waring;C.A. Maier;C.M. Gough

  • Local and general above-stump biomass functions for loblolly pine and slash pine trees

    Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke;Salvador A. Gezan;Timothy J. Albaugh;H. Lee Allen

  • On the complementary relationship between marginal nitrogen and water-use efficiencies among Pinus taeda leaves grown under ambient and CO2-enriched environments

    Sari Palmroth;Gabriel G. Katul;Chris A. Maier;Eric Ward

  • Quantifying the Coarse Root Biomass of Intensively Managed Loblolly Pine Plantations.

    Ashley T. Miller;H. Lee Allen;Chris A. Maier

  • Branch growth and gas exchange in 13-year-old loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda ) trees in response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration and fertilization

    Chris A. Maier;Kurt H. Johnsen;John Butnor;Lance W. Kress

  • Relationships between stem CO2 efflux, substrate supply, and growth in young loblolly pine trees

    Chris A. Maier;Kurt H. Johnsen;Barton D. Clinton;Kim H. Ludovici

  • Short-term effects of fertilization on photosynthesis and leaf morphology of field-grown loblolly pine following long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration

    Chris A. Maier;Sari Palmroth;Eric Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt H. Johnsen
Kurt H. Johnsen US Forest Service
Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University
John R. Seiler
John R. Seiler Virginia Tech
Sari Palmroth
Sari Palmroth Duke University
David S. Ellsworth
David S. Ellsworth Western Sydney University
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Heather R. McCarthy
Heather R. McCarthy University of Oklahoma
Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University
Thomas R. Fox
Thomas R. Fox Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany)
Rodney E. Will
Rodney E. Will Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Chris A. Maier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles