World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John R. Seiler

John R. Seiler

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
32
Citations
3709
World Ranking
5977
National Ranking
1447

John R. Seiler publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Seiler sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 163 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

John R. Seiler D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Seiler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Soil CO2 efflux across four age classes of plantation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) on the Virginia Piedmont

    P.Eric Wiseman;John R Seiler

  • Physiological and Growth Responses of Eight-Year-Old Loblolly Pine Stands to Thinning

    Shannon E. Ginn;John R. Seiler;Ben H. Cazell;Richard E. Kreh

  • Meeting global policy commitments: carbon sequestration and southern pine forests

    Kurt H. Johnsen;David N. Wear;R. Oren;R.O. Teskey

  • Growth and photosynthetic responses of four Virginia Piedmont tree species to shade.

    John W. Groninger;John R. Seiler;John A. Peterson;Richard E. Kreh

  • Short‐term effects of fertilization on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) physiology

    C.M. Gough;J.R. Seiler;Chris A. Maier

  • Growth and physiological responses of young loblolly pine stands to thinning.

    J. A. Peterson;J. R. Seiler;J. Nowak;S. E. Ginn

  • Intensive Utilization of Harvest Residues in Southern Pine Plantations: Quantities Available and Implications for Nutrient Budgets and Sustainable Site Productivity

    M. H. Eisenbies;E. D. Vance;W. M. Aust;J. R. Seiler

  • Influence of seedling roots, environmental factors and soil characteristics on soil CO2 efflux rates in a 2-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation in the Virginia Piedmont.

    R.E Pangle;J Seiler

  • The influence of environmental, soil carbon, root, and stand characteristics on soil CO2 efflux in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations located on the South Carolina Coastal Plain

    Christopher M Gough;John R Seiler

  • Physiological and Morphological Responses of Three Half-Sib Families of Loblolly Pine to Water-Stress Conditioning

    Unknown

  • Changes in chemical and physical properties of pine tree substrate and pine bark during long-term nursery crop production.

    Brian E. Jackson;Robert D. Wright;John R. Seiler

  • A comparison of root growth dynamics of silver maple and flowering dogwood in compacted soil at differing soil water contents

    S. D. Day;J. R. Seiler;N. Persaud

  • Soil Carbon and CO2 Efflux as Influenced by the Thinning of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Plantations on the Piedmont of Virginia

    Marcus F. Selig;John R. Seiler;Michael C. Tyree

  • Growth and physiological responses of yellow-poplar seedlings exposed to ozone and simulated acidic rain.

    Arthur H. Chappelka;Boris I. Chevone;John R. Seiler

  • Influence of water stress on the physiology and growth of red spruce seedlings.

    J. R. Seiler;B. H. Cazell

  • Interactive Role of Elevated CO2, Nutrient Limitations, and Water Stress in the Growth Responses of Red Spruce Seedlings

    Lisa J. Samuelson;John R. Seiler

  • Spatial variability of throughfall chemistry and selected soil properties as influenced by stem distance in a mature Norway spruce (Picea abies, Karst.) stand

    Johannes Seiler;Egbert Matzner

  • Growth, shoot phenology and physiology of diverse seed sources of black spruce: I Seedling responses to varied atmospheric CO 2 concentrations and photoperiods

    Kurt H. Johnsen;John R. Seiler

  • Seasonal Photosynthesis in Fertilized and Nonfertilized Loblolly Pine

    Christopher M. Gough;John R. Seiler;Kurt H. Johnsen;David Arthur Sampson

  • Effects of ozone and water stress on greenhouse-grown fraser fir seedling growth and physiology

    Elizabeth C. Tseng;John R. Seiler;Boris I. Chevone

  • Post-fertilization physiology and growth performance of loblolly pine clones

    N.T. King;J.R. Seiler;T.R. Fox;KurtH. Johnsen

  • Soil CO2 efflux in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations on the Virginia Piedmont and South Carolina Coastal Plain over a rotation-length chronosequence

    Christopher M. Gough;John R. Seiler;P. Eric Wiseman;Christopher A. Maier

  • Growth, shoot phenology and physiology of diverse seed sources of black spruce: II. 23-year-old field trees.

    Kurt H. Johnsen;John R. Seiler;John E. Major

  • Long-term site productivity of a tupelo-cypress swamp 24 years after harvesting disturbances.

    S.E. McKee;W.M. Aust;J.R. Seiler;B.D. Strahm

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Fox
Thomas R. Fox Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany)
Chris A. Maier
Chris A. Maier US Forest Service
Kurt H. Johnsen
Kurt H. Johnsen US Forest Service
Lisa J. Samuelson
Lisa J. Samuelson Auburn University
Christopher M. Gough
Christopher M. Gough Virginia Commonwealth University
Rodney E. Will
Rodney E. Will Oklahoma State University
W. Michael Aust
W. Michael Aust Virginia Tech
Daniel Markewitz
Daniel Markewitz University of Georgia
Robert O. Teskey
Robert O. Teskey University of Georgia
Timothy A. Martin
Timothy A. Martin University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John R. Seiler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles