Data Sources for the Ranking
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Plant Science and Agronomy Scientists in Sweden Ranking is founded on a comprehensive set of bibliometric data primarily sourced from OpenAlex and CrossRef, along with multiple other reputable databases. These sources are among the most prominent and trusted bibliometric repositories available to the research community, providing extensive citation and publication information essential for a robust assessment of scholarly output. The bibliometric data underpinning the citation-based metrics used in this ranking were collected on 2026-01-12, ensuring the most current and accurate information was incorporated into the evaluation process. A researcher’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a metric that specifically includes papers and citation counts confined to the examined discipline, offering a focused measure of impact within Plant Science and Agronomy.
Scope of Research Included in the Ranking
The ranking process involved the examination of 279,971 scientist profiles drawn from a wide range of bibliometric data sources across all academic disciplines. Specifically, for the Plant Science and Agronomy field, 89 scientists were carefully identified and evaluated. To qualify for inclusion in this ranking, a scientist’s D-index had to be at least 30, reflecting a significant scholarly contribution within the discipline. Moreover, the majority of their tier publications were required to pertain directly to Plant Science and Agronomy to ensure relevance and focus. Recognizing the importance of broader scholarly achievements, awards and notable accomplishments within the field were also considered as part of the overall evaluation.
To maintain a rigorous and equitable selection process, the D-index thresholds for considering leading researchers are set in increments of 10, tailored to the estimated total number of scholars within each discipline. This approach guarantees inclusion of the top 1% of leading experts while accommodating field-specific variations in scholarly output. Additionally, the methodology mandates that the proximity between a scientist’s general H-index and their discipline-specific D-index must not exceed 30%, ensuring alignment between overall impact and discipline-focused contributions.
Additional Verification and Methodological Rigor
We recognize that bibliometric data alone cannot fully capture the complexities of scholarly contributions. Therefore, beyond automated data collection, all scientist profiles included in the ranking were manually verified and cross-correlated against publications listed in a wide range of trustworthy sources. This verification process reinforces the accuracy and validity of the ranking and helps to eliminate potential errors or misattributions in the data.
While not directly impacting the ranking position, the number of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings is acknowledged as a valuable secondary indicator of a researcher’s contribution to the Plant Science and Agronomy field.
The final ranking position is established exclusively based on the D-index calculated from data obtained via OpenAlex and CrossRef. These databases are widely respected for their breadth and quality, reinforcing the credibility of the ranking. For a detailed explanation of the methodology and data treatment, we invite readers to visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission Behind the Ranking
At Research.com, our mission is to inspire and inform researchers, academic institutions, companies, and policymakers worldwide by providing transparent and reliable insights into where leading experts are making significant advances in specific fields of study. This ranking offers a valuable resource for the scientific community to recognize and connect with top experts in Plant Science and Agronomy within Sweden, as well as to understand research trends and institutional excellence.
Through careful, meticulous analysis and verification, we strive to build a trusted platform that motivates collaboration, recognizes excellence, and supports informed decision-making across academic and professional landscapes.
