World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7797 7328 761 727 394 62444

Keith M. Kerr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith M. Kerr between 1963 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith M. Kerr published across 63 years, from 1963 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2017. 23 of the 435 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2017. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications
1963 2025

435 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith M. Kerr: publications per year, 1963 to 2025
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 3
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 6
1998 2
1999 0
2000 7
2001 4
2002 2
2003 4
2004 8
2005 4
2006 9
2007 9
2008 8
2009 8
2010 18
2011 21
2012 32
2013 25
2014 23
2015 15
2016 27
2017 33
2018 29
2019 15
2020 26
2021 18
2022 12
2023 26
2024 14
2025 9
Total 435
Download as CSV

Keith M. Kerr publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith M. Kerr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 394 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 394
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith M. Kerr D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith M. Kerr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 101
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith M. Kerr is affiliated with Aberdeen Royal Infirmary in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on medicine, with a strong emphasis on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, and cancer research. Additional areas of study include radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as molecular biology.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics including lung cancer treatments and mutations, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, cancer genomics and diagnostics, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, lung cancer research studies, and RNA modifications and cancer.

Keith M. Kerr has contributed extensively to peer-reviewed literature, with notable publications in prominent venues such as the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Lung Cancer, Annals of Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, and Nature. The number of publications is particularly high in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, with 21 articles, followed by 8 in Lung Cancer and 7 each in Annals of Oncology and Journal of Clinical Oncology, as well as 6 in Nature.

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Keith M. Kerr include:

  • PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, 2021, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015, 2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2023, Annals of Oncology
  • Lung adenocarcinoma promotion by air pollutants, 2023, Nature
  • A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Frequent collaborators include Yasushi Yatabe, Fred R. Hirsch, Andrew G. Nicholson, William D. Travis, and Ming-Sound Tsao. These co-authors have contributed to multiple joint publications, reflecting collaborative efforts in specialized research areas related to lung cancer and pathology.

Best Publications

  • International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma

    William D Travis;Elisabeth Brambilla;Masayuki Noguchi;Andrew G Nicholson

  • The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification

    William D. Travis;Elisabeth Brambilla;Andrew G. Nicholson;Yasushi Yatabe

  • Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up †

    S Novello;F Barlesi;R Califano;R Califano;T Cufer

  • Tracking the Evolution of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Mariam Jamal-Hanjani;Gareth A. Wilson;Nicholas McGranahan;Nicolai Juul Birkbak

  • Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J. B. A. G. Haanen;F. Carbonnel;C. Robert;K. M. Kerr

  • Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution

    Christopher Abbosh;Nicolai J. Birkbak;Nicolai J. Birkbak;Gareth A. Wilson;Gareth A. Wilson;Mariam Jamal-Hanjani

  • Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J. Vansteenkiste;D. De Ruysscher;W.E.E. Eberhardt;E. Lim

  • Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

    Neal I. Lindeman;Philip T. Cagle;Dara L. Aisner;Maria E. Arcila

  • PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors

    Deborah Blythe Doroshow;Sheena Bhalla;Mary Beth Beasley;Lynette M. Sholl

  • Allele-Specific HLA Loss and Immune Escape in Lung Cancer Evolution

    Nicholas McGranahan;Rachel Rosenthal;Crispin T. Hiley;Crispin T. Hiley;Andrew J. Rowan

  • PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Lung Cancer: Results from Phase 1 of the Blueprint PD-L1 IHC Assay Comparison Project

    Fred R. Hirsch;Abigail McElhinny;Dave Stanforth;James Ranger-Moore

  • Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    M Reck;S Popat;N Reinmuth;Dirk De Ruysscher

  • The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of advances since 2015.

    Andrew G. Nicholson;Ming S. Tsao;Mary Beth Beasley;Alain C. Borczuk

  • PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Comparability Study in Real-Life Clinical Samples: Results of Blueprint Phase 2 Project.

    Ming Sound Tsao;Keith M. Kerr;Mark Kockx;Mary Beth Beasley

  • Guidelines on the radical management of patients with lung cancer

    Eric Lim;David Baldwin;Michael Beckles;John Duffy

  • Fc Effector Function Contributes to the Activity of Human Anti-CTLA-4 Antibodies

    Frederick Arce Vargas;Andrew J S Furness;Kevin Litchfield;Kroopa Joshi

  • 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer: early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer consensus on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J. Vansteenkiste;L. Crinò;C. Dooms;J. Y. Douillard

  • Diagnosis of Lung Cancer in Small Biopsies and Cytology: Implications of the 2011 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Classification

    William D. Travis;Elisabeth Brambilla;Masayuki Noguchi;Andrew G. Nicholson

  • Comparing and contrasting predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and targeted therapy of NSCLC

    D. Ross Camidge;Robert C. Doebele;Keith M. Kerr

  • 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer: locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

    W.E.E. Eberhardt;D. De Ruysscher;W. Weder;C. Le Péchoux

Frequent Co-Authors

Lukas Bubendorf
Lukas Bubendorf University Hospital of Basel
Andrew G. Nicholson
Andrew G. Nicholson Royal Brompton Hospital
Yasushi Yatabe
Yasushi Yatabe Nagoya University
Solange Peters
Solange Peters University Hospital of Lausanne
Ming-Sound Tsao
Ming-Sound Tsao Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Rolf A. Stahel
Rolf A. Stahel University of Zurich
Fiona H Blackhall
Fiona H Blackhall University of Manchester
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ignacio I. Wistuba
Ignacio I. Wistuba The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Sylvie Lantuejoul
Sylvie Lantuejoul Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring options beyond traditional medical school, several online degrees can lead to rewarding careers in healthcare. For those interested in mental health, consider advancing your nursing credentials with an msn to pmhnp online program, which prepares you for specialized roles as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

Administrative careers in health services are also in high demand. You can earn your master’s degree through some of the best online mha programs, gaining leadership and management skills without leaving your job. If cost is a concern, there are many options for the masters in healthcare administration cost that keep expenses reasonable.

For nurses aspiring to reach the highest level of clinical practice, pursuing the cheapest dnp online can be a cost-effective way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and a direct route to impactful healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Keith M. Kerr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles