World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sylvie Lantuejoul

Sylvie Lantuejoul

Sylvie Lantuejoul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sylvie Lantuejoul between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sylvie Lantuejoul published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2023. 22 of the 343 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2023. 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 53 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 14 publications
1996 2025

343 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sylvie Lantuejoul: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 4
1997 6
1998 4
1999 1
2000 3
2001 1
2002 4
2003 5
2004 8
2005 12
2006 6
2007 11
2008 13
2009 9
2010 6
2011 4
2012 15
2013 14
2014 9
2015 17
2016 18
2017 17
2018 24
2019 20
2020 16
2021 12
2022 9
2023 53
2024 8
2025 14
Total 343
Download as CSV

Sylvie Lantuejoul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sylvie Lantuejoul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Sylvie Lantuejoul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sylvie Lantuejoul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sylvie Lantuejoul is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France and has contributed extensively to the fields of pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, and molecular biology. Their research covers a spectrum of topics related to lung diseases and cancer, focusing particularly on lung cancer treatments, mutations, and molecular diagnostics.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Sylvie Lantuejoul's subfields of study highlight specialization areas such as:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Cancer Research

Primary topics addressed in their work encompass:

  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • RNA Modifications and Cancer

Their contributions have been published frequently in a variety of journals, with the most publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités
  • ESMO Open
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Recent published papers by Sylvie Lantuejoul include:

  • The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015 (2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)
  • Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2021, Annals of Oncology)
  • A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee (2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)
  • The Promises and Challenges of Tumor Mutation Burden as an Immunotherapy Biomarker: A Perspective from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee (2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)
  • The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Global Survey on Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer (2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)

Sylvie Lantuejoul has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Nicolas Girard
  • Francesca Damiola
  • Matthieu Foll
  • Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta
  • Arnaud Scherpereel

Best Publications

  • Integrative genome analyses identify key somatic driver mutations of small-cell lung cancer

    Martin Peifer;Lynnette Fernández-Cuesta;Martin L. Sos;Julie George

  • Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT)

    Fabrice Barlesi;Julien Mazieres;Jean-Philippe Merlio;Didier Debieuvre

  • The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of advances since 2015.

    Andrew G. Nicholson;Ming S. Tsao;Mary Beth Beasley;Alain C. Borczuk

  • PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Comparability Study in Real-Life Clinical Samples: Results of Blueprint Phase 2 Project.

    Ming Sound Tsao;Keith M. Kerr;Mark Kockx;Mary Beth Beasley

  • A genomics-based classification of human lung tumors

    Danila Seidel;Thomas Zander;Lukas C. Heukamp;Martin Peifer

  • Ectopic Activation of Germline and Placental Genes Identifies Aggressive Metastasis-Prone Lung Cancers

    Sophie Rousseaux;Alexandra Debernardi;Baptiste Jacquiau;Anne Laure Vitte

  • Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial

    Arnaud Scherpereel;Julien Mazieres;Laurent Greillier;Sylvie Lantuejoul

  • TUNEL Apoptotic Cell Detection in Tissue Sections: Critical Evaluation and Improvement

    Françoise Labat-Moleur;Christiane Guillermet;Philippe Lorimier;Catherine Robert

  • Preoperative Circulating Tumor Cell Detection Using the Isolation by Size of Epithelial Tumor Cell Method for Patients with Lung Cancer Is a New Prognostic Biomarker

    Véronique Hofman;Christelle Bonnetaud;Marius I. Ilie;Philippe Vielh

  • Apoptosis-related factors p53, Bcl2, and Bax in neuroendocrine lung tumors.

    E. Brambilla;A. Negoescu;S. Gazzeri;S. Lantuejoul

  • Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up☆

    A.-M.C. Dingemans;M. Früh;A. Ardizzoni;B. Besse

  • Prognostic Effect of Tumor Lymphocytic Infiltration in Resectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Elisabeth Brambilla;Gwénaël Le Teuff;Sophie Marguet;Sylvie Lantuejoul

  • Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer

    Yasushi Yatabe;Sanja Dacic;Alain C. Borczuk;Arne Warth

  • SMARCA4 inactivation defines a group of undifferentiated thoracic malignancies transcriptionally related to BAF-deficient sarcomas.

    Francois Le Loarer;Francois Le Loarer;Sarah Watson;Gaelle Pierron;Vincent Thomas de Montpreville

  • Integrative genomic profiling of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas reveals distinct subtypes of high-grade neuroendocrine lung tumors

    Julie George;Vonn Walter;Vonn Walter;Martin Peifer;Ludmil B. Alexandrov

  • CD74-NRG1 fusions in lung adenocarcinoma

    Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta;Dennis Plenker;Hirotaka Osada;Ruping Sun

  • Subtype Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma Predicts Benefit From Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complete Resection

    Ming Sound Tsao;Sophie Marguet;Gwénaël Le Teuff;Sylvie Lantuejoul

  • The challenge of NSCLC diagnosis and predictive analysis on small samples. Practical approach of a working group

    Erik Thunnissen;Keith Kerr;Felix F.J.F. Herth;Sylvie Lantuejoul

  • Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases.

    Sylvie Lantuejoul;Mary N. Sheppard;Bryan Corrin;Margaret M. Burke

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth Brambilla
Elisabeth Brambilla Grenoble Alpes University
Christian Brambilla
Christian Brambilla Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Nicolas Girard
Nicolas Girard Institute Curie
Keith M. Kerr
Keith M. Kerr Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Andrew G. Nicholson
Andrew G. Nicholson Royal Brompton Hospital
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Benjamin Besse
Benjamin Besse University of Paris-Saclay
Yasushi Yatabe
Yasushi Yatabe Nagoya University
Ming-Sound Tsao
Ming-Sound Tsao Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Mari Mino-Kenudson
Mari Mino-Kenudson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring options beyond traditional medical school can open up rewarding healthcare careers with more flexible study paths. For those interested in administrative or technical roles, financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes makes it possible to start a healthcare career without incurring heavy debt, while studying on your own schedule.

Nursing remains a top choice for many students, and there are now nursing school without teas test options that remove common barriers during the application process, making the transition to a nursing career more accessible.

Those seeking to move into leadership positions can consider a health care administration degree online, which allows you to build business and organizational skills tailored to the healthcare sector.

Registered nurses looking to advance can apply to specialized programs such as adn to msn bridge programs. These bridging degrees are designed for working professionals seeking to earn a master’s degree without starting from scratch.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities for students to join the healthcare field, whether at the entry, advancement, or leadership level—all with flexible online options.

Best Scientists Citing Sylvie Lantuejoul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles