World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
16369
World Ranking
11210
National Ranking
4854

Martin E. Feder publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Feder sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 143 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martin E. Feder D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Feder sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Martin E. Feder is a researcher affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their work spans several areas within Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, emphasizing Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecological Modeling.

Their main research topics include Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Plant and Animal Studies, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, and Species Distribution and Climate Change.

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Conservation Physiology
  • Biological Invasions
  • Journal of Great Lakes Research

Notable recent papers authored by Martin E. Feder include:

  • Building a natural repellent: effects of varying alarm cue exposure on swim activity and spatial avoidance in an invasive fish (2025, Conservation Physiology)
  • Speed kills? Migrating sea lamprey increase speed when exposed to an antipredator cue but make worse short-term decisions (2024, Journal of Great Lakes Research)
  • Olfactory sensitivity and threat-sensitive responses to alarm cue in an invasive fish (2023, Biological Invasions)
  • Attenuation and recovery of an avoidance response to a chemical antipredator cue in an invasive fish: implications for use as a repellent in conservation (2022, Conservation Physiology)

Martin E. Feder has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • C. Michael Wagner
  • Jason D. Bals
  • Anne M. Scott
  • Gregory Byford
  • Brian D. Wisenden

In 1999, Martin E. Feder was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology

    Martin E. Feder;Gretchen E. Hofmann

  • Environmental physiology of the amphibians

    Richard Wassersug;M. E. Feder;W. W. Burggren

  • Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics.

    Martin E Feder;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • New Directions in Ecological Physiology

    Martin E. Feder

  • Deleterious consequences of Hsp70 overexpression in Drosophila melanogaster larvae

    Robert A. Krebs;Martin E. Feder

  • The biological limitations of transcriptomics in elucidating stress and stress responses

    M. E. Feder;J.-C. Walser

  • Cutaneous Gas Exchange in Vertebrates: Design, Patterns, Control and Implications

    Martin E. Feder;Warren W. Burggren

  • Effect of engineering Hsp70 copy number on Hsp70 expression and tolerance of ecologically relevant heat shock in larvae and pupae of Drosophila melanogaster.

    Martin E. Feder;Noemi V. Cartaño;Lukasz Milos;Robert A. Krebs

  • NATURAL VARIATION IN THE EXPRESSION OF THE HEAT-SHOCK PROTEIN HSP70 IN A POPULATION OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND ITS CORRELATION WITH TOLERANCE OF ECOLOGICALLY RELEVANT THERMAL STRESS

    Robert A. Krebs;Martin E. Feder

  • The mid-developmental transition and the evolution of animal body plans

    Michal Levin;Leon Anavy;Alison G. Cole;Eitan Winter

  • Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates

    Martin E. Feder;George V. Lauder

  • Hsp70 and larval thermotolerance in Drosophila melanogaster: how much is enough and when is more too much?

    Robert A. Krebs;Martin E. Feder

  • Tissue-specific variation in Hsp70 expression and thermal damage in Drosophila melanogaster larvae.

    R A Krebs;M E Feder

  • Spatiotemporal transcriptomics reveals the evolutionary history of the endoderm germ layer

    Tamar Hashimshony;Martin Feder;Michal Levin;Brian K. Hall

  • Natural thermal stress and heat‐shock protein expression in Drosophila larvae and pupae

    M. E. Feder;N. Blair;H. Figueras

  • Evolution of heat-shock protein expression underlying adaptive responses to environmental stress

    Bing Chen;Martin E. Feder;Le Kang

  • What accounts for the wide variation in life span of genetically identical organisms reared in a constant environment

    Thomas B.L. Kirkwood;Martin Feder;Caleb E. Finch;Claudio Franceschi

  • EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION OF HSP70 EXPRESSION AND THERMOTOLERANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

    Brian R. Bettencourt;Martin E. Feder;Sandro Cavicchi

  • What evidence is there for the existence of individual genes with antagonistic pleiotropic effects

    Armand M. Leroi;Andrzej Bartke;Giovanna De Benedictis;Claudio Franceschi

  • RESPONSE TO NATURAL AND LABORATORY SELECTION AT THE DROSOPHILA HSP70 GENES

    Brian R. Bettencourt;InYoung Kim;Ary A. Hoffmann;Ary A. Hoffmann;Martin E. Feder

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Krebs
Robert A. Krebs Cleveland State University
Warren W. Burggren
Warren W. Burggren University of North Texas
Bing Chen
Bing Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Richard J. Wassersug
Richard J. Wassersug University of British Columbia
Itai Yanai
Itai Yanai New York University
Timothy L. Karr
Timothy L. Karr Arizona State University
Detlev Arendt
Detlev Arendt Heidelberg University
Mark Q. Martindale
Mark Q. Martindale University of Florida
Allen G. Gibbs
Allen G. Gibbs University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Bernard M. Degnan
Bernard M. Degnan University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Biology and Biochemistry have a wide range of alternative and supplementary online programs to consider in the U.S. Many roles in the allied health sector value a foundational understanding of these subjects, and online study makes these pathways more accessible and flexible than ever.

If you’re interested in medical imaging and diagnostics, online rad tech programs provide a practical entry point and can lead to employment as a radiologic technologist. For those focused on nutrition and health promotion, exploring top dietetics masters programs can open doors to specialized careers in dietetics and food science.

Many students also pursue clinical roles through online medical assisting classes, which offer strong job prospects and frequently include financial aid options. Additionally, for those already working as medical assistants, an ma to lpn bridge program online provides an accelerated path to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse.

These online degrees and bridge programs allow for flexible, affordable career growth, complementing core studies in Biology and Biochemistry with direct, hands-on skills for today’s healthcare workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Martin E. Feder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles