World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
22064
World Ranking
15264
National Ranking
7699

Gordon S. Mitchell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon S. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 477 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gordon S. Mitchell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon S. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon S. Mitchell is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on various subfields including Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably Neuroscience of respiration and sleep, Spinal Cord Injury Research, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Sleep and Wakefulness Research, High Altitude and Hypoxia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research, and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology.

Frequently published in several academic venues, their publications appear often in The FASEB Journal, Physiology, Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology, and Journal of Applied Physiology.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Gordon S. Mitchell are:

  • Silent hypoxaemia in COVID-19 patients, 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • Therapeutic acute intermittent hypoxia: A translational roadmap for spinal cord injury and neuromuscular disease, 2021, Experimental Neurology
  • Crossing the blood-brain barrier with carbon dots: uptake mechanism and in vivo cargo delivery, 2021, Nanoscale Advances
  • Acute intermittent hypoxia boosts spinal plasticity in humans with tetraplegia, 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • Single-session effects of acute intermittent hypoxia on breathing function after human spinal cord injury, 2021, Experimental Neurology

Gordon S. Mitchell has collaborated frequently with several researchers. The most frequent coauthors include:

  • Alexandria B. Marciante
  • Yasin B. Seven
  • Elisa J. Gonzalez-Rothi
  • Raphael R. Perim
  • Joseph F. Welch

Best Publications

  • Breathing: Rhythmicity, plasticity, chemosensitivity

    Jack L. Feldman;Gordon S. Mitchell;Eugene E. Nattie

  • Time domains of the hypoxic ventilatory response.

    F.L Powell;W.K Milsom;G.S Mitchell

  • BDNF is necessary and sufficient for spinal respiratory plasticity following intermittent hypoxia

    Tracy L Baker-Herman;David D Fuller;Ryan W Bavis;Andrea G Zabka

  • Invited Review: Intermittent hypoxia and respiratory plasticity

    Gordon S. Mitchell;Tracy L. Baker;Steven A. Nanda;David D. Fuller

  • Invited Review: Neuroplasticity in respiratory motor control

    Gordon S. Mitchell;Stephen M. Johnson

  • Therapeutic potential of intermittent hypoxia: a matter of dose.

    Angela Andrea Navarrete-Opazo;Gordon S. Mitchell

  • Hypoxia-induced long-term facilitation of respiratory activity is serotonin dependent

    Karen B. Bach;Gordon S. Mitchell

  • Exercise increases hippocampal neurogenesis to high levels but does not improve spatial learning in mice bred for increased voluntary wheel running.

    Justin S. Rhodes;Henriette van Praag;Susan Jeffrey;Isabelle Girard

  • Phrenic Long-Term Facilitation Requires Spinal Serotonin Receptor Activation and Protein Synthesis

    Tracy. L. Baker-Herman;Gordon S. Mitchell

  • Chronic intermittent hypoxia elicits serotonin-dependent plasticity in the central neural control of breathing.

    Ling L;Fuller Dd;Bach Kb;Kinkead R

  • Episodic but not continuous hypoxia elicits long-term facilitation of phrenic motor output in rats.

    T. L. Baker;G. S. Mitchell

  • Time-dependent phrenic nerve responses to carotid afferent activation: intact vs. decerebellate rats

    F. Hayashi;S. K. Coles;K. B. Bach;G. S. Mitchell

  • Long term facilitation of phrenic motor output.

    D.D Fuller;K.B Bach;T.L Baker;R Kinkead

  • Spinal Synaptic Enhancement with Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Improves Respiratory Function after Chronic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

    Francis J. Golder;Gordon S. Mitchell

  • Selected Contribution: Phrenic long-term facilitation requires 5-HT receptor activation during but not following episodic hypoxia

    D. D. Fuller;A. G. Zabka;T. L. Baker;G. S. Mitchell

  • Exposure to Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Augments Somatic Motor Function in Humans With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

    Randy D. Trumbower;Arun Jayaraman;Arun Jayaraman;Gordon S. Mitchell;William Z. Rymer;William Z. Rymer

  • Repetitive Intermittent Hypoxia Induces Respiratory and Somatic Motor Recovery after Chronic Cervical Spinal Injury

    Mary R. Lovett-Barr;Irawan Satriotomo;Gillian D. Muir;Julia E. R. Wilkerson

  • Daily intermittent hypoxia enhances walking after chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized trial.

    Heather Brant Hayes;Arun Jayaraman;Megan Herrmann;Gordon S. Mitchell

  • Sex steroid hormones and the neural control of breathing.

    Mary Behan;Andrea G. Zabka;Cathy F. Thomas;Gordon S. Mitchell

  • Is there a link between intermittent hypoxia‐induced respiratory plasticity and obstructive sleep apnoea?

    Safraaz Mahamed;Gordon S. Mitchell

Frequent Co-Authors

David D. Fuller
David D. Fuller University of Florida
William Z. Rymer
William Z. Rymer Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Jack L. Feldman
Jack L. Feldman University of California, Los Angeles
Justin S. Rhodes
Justin S. Rhodes University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Theodore Garland
Theodore Garland University of California, Riverside
Gary C. Sieck
Gary C. Sieck Mayo Clinic
Monica A. Perez
Monica A. Perez Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Clive N. Svendsen
Clive N. Svendsen Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
William C. McGaghie
William C. McGaghie Northwestern University
Mikhail A. Lebedev
Mikhail A. Lebedev Moscow State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean you must start with medical school. There are several online pathways that can help you enter or advance in the healthcare field quickly and conveniently.

Registered nurses looking to expand their qualifications often consider the online rn to bsn no clinicals programs, which allow for degree completion without traditional clinical rotations. For those seeking the highest level of nursing practice, some pursue a terminal degree through accelerated options like a 1 year dnp program online, enabling faster entry into advanced roles.

Flexibility can be crucial for busy professionals. For those preferring less academic research, there are dnp programs without dissertation that focus more on practical skills than lengthy research requirements. Alternatively, those seeking a faster route into healthcare can look into accelerated lpn programs—ideal for launching a nursing career in less time.

Each of these pathways offers unique benefits and may accelerate your journey toward a rewarding career in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon S. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles