World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
11580
World Ranking
3871
National Ranking
1761

Paul J. Reier publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Reier sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 195 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul J. Reier D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Reier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Reier is a researcher affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with specific focus on spinal cord injury research and nerve injury and rehabilitation.

The main fields of study for Paul J. Reier include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, their subfields of study cover:

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Their key topics of research work involve:

  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Nerve Injury and Regeneration

Paul J. Reier has published in several scientific venues, including:

  • Journal of Neuroscience Research

One of their recent papers is titled Recovery of walking in nonambulatory children with chronic spinal cord injuries: Case series published in 2023 in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul J. Reier include:

  • Lyandysha V. Zholudeva
  • Dena R. Howland
  • Shelley A. Trimble
  • Emily J. Fox
  • Nicole J. Tester

Best Publications

  • Recombinant AAV viral vectors pseudotyped with viral capsids from serotypes 1, 2, and 5 display differential efficiency and cell tropism after delivery to different regions of the central nervous system.

    Corinna Burger;Oleg S. Gorbatyuk;Margaret J. Velardo;Carmen S. Peden

  • Intraspinal transplantation of embryonic spinal cord tissue in neonatal and adult rats.

    P. J. Reier;B. S. Bregman;J. R. Wujek

  • Efficient transduction of green fluorescent protein in spinal cord neurons using adeno-associated virus vectors containing cell type-specific promoters

    AL Peel;S Zolotukhin;GW Schrimsher;N Muzyczka

  • Recovery of Function after Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms Underlying Transplant-Mediated Recovery of Function Differ after Spinal Cord Injury in Newborn and Adult Rats

    Barbara S. Bregman;Ellen Kunkel-Bagden;Paul J. Reier;Hai Ning Dai

  • GLIOSIS FOLLOWING CNS INJURY: THE ANATOMY OF ASTROCYTIC SCARS AND THEIR INFLUENCES ON AXONAL ELONGATION

    Paul J. Reier

  • Neural tissue transplants rescue axotomized rubrospinal cells from retrograde death

    Barbara S. Bregman;Paul J. Reier

  • Cellular Transplantation Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury and Translational Neurobiology

    Paul J. Reier

  • Altered patterns of reflex excitability subsequent to contusion injury of the rat spinal cord.

    F. J. Thompson;P. J. Reier;C. C. Lucas;R. Parmer

  • Fetal grafts alter chronic behavioral outcome after contusion damage to the adult rat spinal cord.

    Bradford T. Stokes;Paul J. Reier

  • Axonal projections between fetal spinal cord transplants and the adult rat spinal cord: a neuroanatomical tracing study of local interactions.

    Lyn B. Jakeman;Paul J. Reier

  • Neural deficits contribute to respiratory insufficiency in Pompe disease

    Lara R. DeRuisseau;David D. Fuller;Kai Qiu;Keith C. DeRuisseau

  • Transplantation of fetal spinal cord tissue into the chronically injured adult rat spinal cord.

    John D. Houlé;Paul J. Reier

  • Fetal cell grafts into resection and contusion/compression injuries of the rat and cat spinal cord.

    Paul J. Reier;Bradford T. Stokes;Bradford T. Stokes;Floyd J. Thompson;Douglas K. Anderson;Douglas K. Anderson

  • Cervical prephrenic interneurons in the normal and lesioned spinal cord of the adult rat.

    Michael A. Lane;Todd E. White;Marcella A. Coutts;Alex L. Jones

  • Intermittent hypoxia and neurorehabilitation.

    Elisa J. Gonzalez-Rothi;Kun-Ze Lee;Erica A. Dale;Paul J. Reier

  • Astrocyte activation and fibrous gliosis: glial fibrillary acidic protein immunostaining of astrocytes following intraspinal cord grafting of fetal CNS tissue.

    Lawrence F. Eng;Paul J. Reier;John D. Houle

  • Feasibility and safety of neural tissue transplantation in patients with syringomyelia.

    Edward D. Wirth;Paul J. Reier;Richard G. Fessler;Floyd J. Thompson

  • Spinal circuitry and respiratory recovery following spinal cord injury.

    Michael A. Lane;Kun-Ze Lee;David D. Fuller;Paul J. Reier

  • Spontaneous Functional Recovery in a Paralyzed Hemidiaphragm Following Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Rats

    Kwaku D. Nantwi;Ashraf A. El-Bohy;Gregory W. Schrimsher;Paul J. Reier

  • Modest spontaneous recovery of ventilation following chronic high cervical hemisection in rats.

    D.D. Fuller;N.J. Doperalski;B.J. Dougherty;M.S. Sandhu

  • Forelimb Motor Performance Following Dorsal Column, Dorsolateral Funiculi, or Ventrolateral Funiculi Lesions of the Cervical Spinal Cord in the Rat

    Gregory W. Schrimsher;Paul J. Reier

Frequent Co-Authors

David D. Fuller
David D. Fuller University of Florida
Douglas K. Anderson
Douglas K. Anderson University of Florida
Donald C. Bolser
Donald C. Bolser University of Florida
Vassilis E. Koliatsos
Vassilis E. Koliatsos Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Bradford T. Stokes
Bradford T. Stokes The Ohio State University
Barry J. Byrne
Barry J. Byrne University of Florida
Alan Tessler
Alan Tessler Drexel University
Gordon S. Mitchell
Gordon S. Mitchell University of Florida
Lyn B. Jakeman
Lyn B. Jakeman National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Reier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles