World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
11373
World Ranking
7524
National Ranking
3242

Bradford T. Stokes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradford T. Stokes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bradford T. Stokes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradford T. Stokes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradford T. Stokes is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. The scientist's research profile reflects engagement primarily within this academic institution.

The available data does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main or subfields of study, main topics of work, or awards won associated with Bradford T. Stokes. As a result, specific research contributions or thematic emphases cannot be detailed.

Given the limited bibliographic and topical information, it is not possible to provide a detailed account of Bradford T. Stokes's research domains, collaborative networks, or publication patterns.

Best Publications

  • Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats.

    Phillip G. Popovich;Ping Wei;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Depletion of hematogenous macrophages promotes partial hindlimb recovery and neuroanatomical repair after experimental spinal cord injury.

    P. G. Popovich;Zhen Guan;Ping Wei;I. Huitinga

  • Neurotrophin-3 and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Induce Oligodendrocyte Proliferation and Myelination of Regenerating Axons in the Contused Adult Rat Spinal Cord

    Dana M. McTigue;Philip J. Horner;Bradford T. Stokes;Fred H. Gage

  • Proliferation of NG2-Positive Cells and Altered Oligodendrocyte Numbers in the Contused Rat Spinal Cord

    Dana M. McTigue;Ping Wei;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Cytokine mRNA Profiles in Contused Spinal Cord and Axotomized Facial Nucleus Suggest a Beneficial Role for Inflammation and Gliosis

    Wolfgang J. Streit;Susan L. Semple-Rowland;Sean D. Hurley;Rehae C. Miller

  • A Quantitative Spatial Analysis of the Blood–Spinal Cord Barrier: I. Permeability Changes after Experimental Spinal Contusion Injury

    Phillip G. Popovich;Philip J. Horner;Bradford B. Mullin;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Stimulates Hindlimb Stepping and Sprouting of Cholinergic Fibers after Spinal Cord Injury

    Lyn B. Jakeman;Ping Wei;Zhen Guan;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Concept of autoimmunity following spinal cord injury: Possible roles for T lymphocytes in the traumatized central nervous system

    P.G. Popovich;B.T. Stokes;C.C. Whitacre

  • Extracellular calcium activity in the injured spinal cord

    B.T. Stokes;P. Fox;G. Hollinden

  • Behavioral and histological outcomes following graded spinal cord contusion injury in the C57Bl/6 mouse.

    M Ma;D M Basso;P Walters;B T Stokes

  • Selective chemokine mRNA accumulation in the rat spinal cord after contusion injury.

    Dana M. McTigue;Marie Tani;Kimberly Krivacic;Ann Chernosky

  • Traumatic spinal cord injury produced by controlled contusion in mouse.

    Lyn B. Jakeman;Zhen Guan;Ping Wei;Ravi Ponnappan

  • Fetal grafts alter chronic behavioral outcome after contusion damage to the adult rat spinal cord.

    Bradford T. Stokes;Paul J. Reier

  • Fetal cell grafts into resection and contusion/compression injuries of the rat and cat spinal cord.

    Paul J. Reier;Bradford T. Stokes;Bradford T. Stokes;Floyd J. Thompson;Douglas K. Anderson;Douglas K. Anderson

  • An electromechanical spinal injury technique with dynamic sensitivity

    Bradford T. Stokes;David H. Noyes;Donald L. Behrmann

  • Operant conditioning of H-reflex can correct a locomotor abnormality after spinal cord injury in rats.

    Yi Chen;Xiang Yang Chen;Lyn B. Jakeman;Lu Chen

  • Quantitation of intracellular free calcium in single adult cardiomyocytes by fura-2 fluorescence microscopy: calibration of fura-2 ratios.

    Li Qian;Ruth A. Altschuld;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Operant conditioning of H-reflex in spinal cord-injured rats.

    Xiang Yang Chen;Jonathan R. Wolpaw;Lyn B. Jakeman;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis of graded contusion lesions in the spinal cord of the rat.

    Jacqueline C. Bresnahan;Michael S. Beattie;Bradford T. Stokes;Kevin M. Conway

  • Localization of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 and Receptor mRNA after Experimental Spinal Cord Injury

    Dana M. McTigue;Phillip G. Popovich;Todd E. Morgan;Bradford T. Stokes

  • Peroxynitrite production and activation of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) synthetase in spinal cord injury.

    G. S. Scott;L. B. Jakeman;B. T. Stokes;Csaba Szabo

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillip G. Popovich
Phillip G. Popovich The Ohio State University
Lyn B. Jakeman
Lyn B. Jakeman National Institutes of Health
Dana M. McTigue
Dana M. McTigue The Ohio State University
Paul J. Reier
Paul J. Reier University of Florida
Philip J. Horner
Philip J. Horner Houston Methodist
Jonathan R. Wolpaw
Jonathan R. Wolpaw National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Michael S. Beattie
Michael S. Beattie University of California, San Francisco
Wolfgang J. Streit
Wolfgang J. Streit University of Florida
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan University of California, San Francisco
Douglas K. Anderson
Douglas K. Anderson University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Bradford T. Stokes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles