World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ingrid Van Keilegom

Ingrid Van Keilegom

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 36 2615 2333 35 34 315 6507

Ingrid Van Keilegom publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ingrid Van Keilegom between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ingrid Van Keilegom published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2020. 38 of the 334 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2020. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 16 publications
1996 2025

334 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ingrid Van Keilegom: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 5
2001 4
2002 5
2003 7
2004 3
2005 5
2006 5
2007 13
2008 9
2009 11
2010 12
2011 16
2012 13
2013 19
2014 15
2015 12
2016 9
2017 21
2018 12
2019 16
2020 25
2021 17
2022 21
2023 14
2024 22
2025 16
Total 334
Download as CSV

Ingrid Van Keilegom publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid Van Keilegom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 312–316 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 315 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23 315
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Ingrid Van Keilegom D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid Van Keilegom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145 36
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Ingrid Van Keilegom is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and specializes in the field of Mathematics, with a particular focus on Statistics and Probability. Their academic work spans a diverse range of themes within statistical methodology and inference.

The main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Their research output includes numerous papers published in notable academic venues. Frequent publication platforms consist of:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Electronic Journal of Statistics
  • The Annals of Statistics
  • Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
  • Biometrika

Some of the recent research papers produced by Ingrid Van Keilegom and collaborators are:

  • Review on ROC Curves in the Presence of Covariates, 2022, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Dependent censoring based on parametric copulas, 2022, Biometrika
  • Infectious diseases epidemiology, quantitative methodology, and clinical research in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspective from a European country, 2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Two-step semiparametric empirical likelihood inference, 2020, The Annals of Statistics
  • Copula-based inference for bivariate survival data with left truncation and dependent censoring, 2022, Insurance Mathematics and Economics

Frequent co-authors contributing to their scholarly work include:

  • Jad Beyhum
  • Jean-Pierre Florens
  • Geert Molenberghs
  • Eni Musta
  • Ariel Alonso

Ingrid Van Keilegom was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2013, reflecting an established presence within the statistical community.

Best Publications

  • Estimation of semiparametric models when the criterion function is not smooth

    Xiaohong Chen;Oliver Linton;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Extending the Scope of Empirical Likelihood

    Nils Lid Hjort;Ian W. McKeague;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Non-parametric Estimation of the Residual Distribution

    Michael G. Akritas;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Bootstrapping the Poisson log-bilinear model for mortality forecasting

    Natacha Brouhns;Michel Denuit;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Bootstrap confidence bands for regression curves and their derivatives

    Gerda Claeskens;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression

    Song Xi Chen;Song Xi Chen;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Cure models in survival analysis

    Maïlis Amico;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Cure Models in Survival Analysis

    Maïlis Amico;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Estimation of Semiparametric Models When the Criterion Function is Not Smooth

    Xiaohong Chen;Oliver B. Linton;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Two-sample tests in functional data analysis starting from discrete data

    Peter Hall;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Regression when both response and predictor are functions

    F. Ferraty;I. Van Keilegom;P. Vieu

  • Transfer of tail information in censored regression models

    Ingrid Van Keilegom;Michaël G. Akritas

  • On the Validity of the Bootstrap in Non-Parametric Functional Regression

    Frederic Ferraty;Ingrid Van Keilegom;Philippe Vieu

  • Estimation and Bootstrap with Censored Data in Fixed Design Nonparametric Regression

    Ingrid Van Keilegom;Noël Veraverbeke

  • Estimation of a semiparametric transformation model

    Y. Oliver Linton;Stefan Sperlich;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Nonparametric Least Squares Methods for Stochastic Frontier Models

    Léopold Simar;Ingrid Van Keilegom;Valentin Zelenyuk

  • Estimating the error distribution in nonparametric multiple regression with applications to model testing

    Natalie Neumeyer;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Goodness-of-fit tests in parametric regression based on the estimation of the error distribution

    Ingrid Van Keilegom;Wenceslao González Manteiga;César Andrés Sánchez Sellero

  • A new test for the parametric form of the variance function in non‐parametric regression

    Holger Dette;Natalie Neumeyer;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Empirical likelihood tests for two-sample problems via nonparametric density estimation

    Riccardo Cao;Ingrid Van Keilegom

  • Empirical Likelihood for Non-Smooth Criterion Functions

    Elisa Maria Molanes Lopez;Ingrid Van Keilegom;Noël Veraverbeke

  • Testing for the equality of k regression curves

    Juan Carlos Pardo-Fernandez;Ingrid Van Keilegom;Wenceslao Gonzalez-Manteiga

Frequent Co-Authors

Song Xi Chen
Song Xi Chen Peking University
Wenceslao González-Manteiga
Wenceslao González-Manteiga University of Santiago de Compostela
Raymond J. Carroll
Raymond J. Carroll Texas A&M University
Léopold Simar
Léopold Simar Université Catholique de Louvain
Holger Dette
Holger Dette Ruhr University Bochum
Enno Mammen
Enno Mammen Heidelberg University
Jeffrey S. Racine
Jeffrey S. Racine McMaster University
Oliver Linton
Oliver Linton University of Cambridge
Michel Denuit
Michel Denuit Université Catholique de Louvain
Paul W. Wilson
Paul W. Wilson Clemson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mathematics, exploring related fields through online degrees offers valuable opportunities. Business and finance are popular options, with programs such as the cheapest dba online providing a cost-effective route to advanced business administration skills. These programs often prepare graduates for leadership roles that benefit from strong analytical backgrounds.

Similarly, those inclined towards financial mathematics may consider pursuing the cheapest online masters in finance. This degree blends quantitative analysis with financial theory, opening doors in banking, investment, and risk management sectors.

For faster advancement in the corporate world, the fastest mba online programs offer accelerated paths to earn an MBA. These programs are ideal for professionals seeking to quickly leverage their mathematics background into managerial positions.

Marketing is another dynamic field that actively utilizes data analysis and strategic thinking. The master's degree in marketing combines creativity with quantitative skills, making it a lucrative option for math graduates aiming to excel in consumer insights and digital marketing careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ingrid Van Keilegom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles