World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wenceslao González-Manteiga

Wenceslao González-Manteiga

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
35
Citations
4711
World Ranking
2797
National Ranking
58

Wenceslao González-Manteiga publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wenceslao González-Manteiga sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 174 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Wenceslao González-Manteiga D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wenceslao González-Manteiga sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wenceslao González-Manteiga is affiliated with the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain and has a research portfolio focused primarily on mathematics, especially within statistics and probability. Their contributions span a significant number of studies intersecting advanced statistical methodologies and applications.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics in statistical analysis and modeling. These include:

  • Parametric Estimation of Diffusion Processes: A Review and Comparative Study, 2021, Mathematics
  • Non-parametric comparative analysis of the spatiotemporal pattern of human-caused and natural wildfires in Galicia, 2022, International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • A Critical Review of LASSO and Its Derivatives for Variable Selection Under Dependence Among Covariates, 2021, International Statistical Review
  • A non-parametric test for comparing conditional ROC curves, 2020, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
  • Nonparametric spatiotemporal analysis of violent crime. A case study in the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area, 2020, Spatial Statistics

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Manuel Febrero-Bande, Ana M. Bianco, Graciela Boente, Isabel Fuentes-Santos, and Laura Freijeiro-González. The number of joint publications varies, with the most frequent collaborator being Manuel Febrero-Bande, with 19 coauthored works.

Publication venues where González-Manteiga has contributed most often include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
  • Test
  • International Statistical Review
  • Statistical Papers

Their principal fields of study are Mathematics, with a strong emphasis on Statistics and Probability. Subfields include Artificial Intelligence, Finance, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Economics and Econometrics. Within their research, main topics addressed are:

  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Stochastic processes and financial applications
  • Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques

Best Publications

  • Outlier detection in functional data by depth measures, with application to identify abnormal NOx levels

    Manuel Febrero;Pedro Galeano;Wenceslao González-Manteiga

  • An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models

    Wenceslao González-Manteiga;Rosa M. Crujeiras

  • Bootstrap mean squared error of a small-area EBLUP

    W. González-Manteiga;M. J. Lombardía;I. Molina;D. Morales

  • Asymptotic properties of a generalized kaplan-meier estimator with some applications

    W. Gonzalez-Manteiga;C. Cadarso-Suarez

  • Modelling of the monthly and daily behaviour of the runoff of the Xallas river using Box-Jenkins and neural networks methods

    Marı́a Castellano-Méndez;Wenceslao González-Manteiga;Manuel Febrero-Bande;José Manuel Prada-Sánchez

  • Editorial: Statistics for Functional Data

    Wenceslao González Manteiga;Philippe Vieu

  • Estimation of the mean squared error of predictors of small area linear parameters under a logistic mixed model

    W. González-Manteiga;M. J. Lombardía;I. Molina;D. Morales

  • Forest fire spatial pattern analysis in Galicia (NW Spain).

    I. Fuentes-Santos;M. F. Marey-Pérez;W. González-Manteiga

  • Analytic and bootstrap approximations of prediction errors under a multivariate Fay-Herriot model

    W. González-Manteiga;M. J. Lombardía;I. Molina;D. Morales

  • A functional analysis of NOx levels: location and scale estimation and outlier detection

    Manuel Febrero;Pedro Galeano;Wenceslao González-Manteiga

  • Functional Principal Component Regression and Functional Partial Least‐squares Regression: An Overview and a Comparative Study

    Manuel Febrero-Bande;Pedro Galeano;Wenceslao González-Manteiga

  • Kernel density estimation for directional-linear data

    Eduardo García-Portugués;Rosa M. Crujeiras;Wenceslao González-Manteiga

  • PLUG‐IN ESTIMATION OF GENERAL LEVEL SETS

    Antonio Cuevas;Wenceslao Gonzalez-Manteiga;Alberto Rodriguez-Casal

  • Bootstrap selection of the smoothing parameter in nonparametric hazard rate estimation

    Wenceslao González-Manteiga;Ricardo Cao;James S. Marron

  • A Critical Review of LASSO and Its Derivatives for Variable Selection Under Dependence Among Covariates

    Laura Freijeiro-González;Manuel Febrero-Bande;Wenceslao González-Manteiga

  • A goodness-of-fit test for the functional linear model with scalar response

    Eduardo García-Portugués;Wenceslao González-Manteiga;Manuel Febrero-Bande

  • Generalized additive models for functional data

    Manuel Febrero-Bande;Wenceslao González-Manteiga

  • Goodness-of-fit test for linear models based on local polynomials

    J.T. Alcalá;J.A. Cristóbal;W. González-Manteiga

  • Testing for the equality of k regression curves

    Juan Carlos Pardo-Fernandez;Ingrid Van Keilegom;Wenceslao Gonzalez-Manteiga

  • Saving computer time in constructing consistent bootstrap prediction intervals for autoregressive processes

    R. Cao;M Febrerobande;W Gonzalez-Manteiga;J.M Prada-Sanchez

  • Comparison of kriging and neural networks with application to the exploitation of a slate mine

    J. M. Matías;A. Vaamonde;J. Taboada;W. González-Manteiga

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge Mateu
Jorge Mateu Jaume I University
Domingo Morales
Domingo Morales Miguel Hernandez University
José M. C. Pereira
José M. C. Pereira University of Lisbon
Emilio Porcu
Emilio Porcu Khalifa University
Winfried Stute
Winfried Stute University of Giessen
Juan C. Reboredo
Juan C. Reboredo University of Santiago de Compostela
Todd A. Alonzo
Todd A. Alonzo University of Southern California
James Stephen Marron
James Stephen Marron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Antonio Salas
Antonio Salas University of Santiago de Compostela

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, expanding skill sets through complementary degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals consider pursuing flexible options like one year MBA programs to enhance leadership and business expertise in a short timeframe. These programs provide a fast track to management roles where quantitative skills are prized.

When looking to continue education without starting from scratch, online MBA transfer credits options offer valuable pathways for those who have already completed some graduate coursework. This flexibility makes it easier to merge mathematical proficiency with business acumen.

Another increasingly popular route involves earning a masters in data analytics. This degree complements a math background by focusing on extracting actionable insights from complex data — a highly sought-after skill in today’s data-driven economy.

For those exploring MBA specializations, the easiest MBA specialization choices can provide streamlined curricula that suit math graduates looking to transition into business roles with less burden.

Combining mathematics with these related degrees can significantly boost career prospects, blending analytical rigor with practical applications across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Wenceslao González-Manteiga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles