World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean M. Bartunek

Jean M. Bartunek

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 61 499 465 225 206 223 20050

Jean M. Bartunek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean M. Bartunek between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean M. Bartunek published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 15 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1975 2025

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean M. Bartunek: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 4
1980 3
1981 1
1982 3
1983 4
1984 2
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 4
1990 0
1991 3
1992 4
1993 4
1994 4
1995 1
1996 8
1997 4
1998 3
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 7
2003 8
2004 4
2005 1
2006 8
2007 8
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 10
2012 11
2013 10
2014 14
2015 7
2016 6
2017 13
2018 3
2019 8
2020 8
2021 16
2022 9
2023 7
2024 6
2025 9
Total 259
Download as CSV

Jean M. Bartunek publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean M. Bartunek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 220–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 223 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37 223
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean M. Bartunek D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean M. Bartunek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32 61
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management

Overview

Jean M. Bartunek is affiliated with Boston College in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a strong emphasis on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Their scholarly work spans related subfields including Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research covers main topics within Management and Organizational Studies, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Management Theory and Practice, Organizational Learning and Leadership, Ethics in Business and Education, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, as well as Management and Marketing Education.

Frequently collaborating with other scholars, Jean M. Bartunek has coauthors including Sven Kunisch, David Denyer, Laura B. Cardinal, Linda L. Putnam, and Kimberly Rocheville. Their research contributions have been published in multiple venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management Inquiry
  • The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
  • Academy of Management Learning and Education
  • Strategic Organization

Recent published papers by Jean M. Bartunek include:

  • How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy, 2024, Academy of Management Learning and Education
  • Curriculum Isn't Enough: What Relevant Teaching Means, How It Feels, Why It Matters, and What It Requires, 2022, Academy of Management Learning and Education

Jean M. Bartunek has also contributed to the academic literature through book publications. One such work is Delivering Impact in Management Research: When Does it Really Happen?, published by Lancaster University in 2021.

They have been recognized with honors such as being named a Fellow of the British Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order.

    Jean M. Bartunek

  • Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics

    Sara L. Rynes;Jean M. Bartunek;Richard L. Daft

  • First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach:

    Jean M. Bartunek;Michael K. Moch

  • Insider/outsider team research

    Jean Bartunek;Meryl Reis Louis

  • The Role of Affective Experience in Work Motivation

    Myeong-Gu Seo;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Jean M. Bartunek

  • What Makes Management Research Interesting, And Why Does It Matter?

    Jean M. Bartunek;Sara L. Rynes;R. Duane Ireland

  • On the Receiving End: Sensemaking, Emotion, and Assessments of an Organizational Change Initiated by Others

    Jean M. Bartunek;Denise M. Rousseau;Jenny W. Rudolph;Judith A. DePalma

  • LEARNING FROM ACADEMIA: THE IMPORTANCE OF RELATIONSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL LIFE

    Connie J. G. Gersick;Jane E. Dutton;Jean M. Bartunek

  • Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike: The Paradoxes of Academic–Practitioner Relationships

    Jean Marie Bartunek;Sara Lynn Rynes

  • Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration.

    Jean M. Bartunek

  • ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE: KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN PRACTITIONERS AND ACADEMICS.

    Unknown

  • Developing “Complicated” Understanding in Administrators

    Jean M. Bartunek;Judith R. Gordon;Rita Preszler Weathersby

  • An affect-based model of recipients' responses to organizational change events

    Shaul Oreg;Jean M. Bartunek;Gayoung Lee;Boram Do

  • Care and Compassion Through an Organizational Lens: Opening Up New Possibilities

    Sara L. Rynes;Jean M. Bartunek;Jane E. Dutton;Joshua D. Margolis

  • Time in Strategic Change Research

    Sven Kunisch;Jean M. Bartunek;Johanna Mueller;Quy N. Huy

  • The Construction and Contributions of "Implications for Practice": What's in Them and What Might They Offer?

    Jean M. Bartunek;Sara L. Rynes

  • Corporations as social change agents: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, and environmental dynamics

    Robert J. Bies;Jean M. Bartunek;Timothy L. Fort;Mayer N. Zald

  • Hidden Conflict In Organizations: Uncovering Behind-the-Scenes Disputes

    James Tucker;Deborah M. Kolb;Jean M. Bartunek

  • Senior Managers' Sensemaking and Responses to Strategic Change

    Julia Balogun;Jean M. Bartunek;Boram Do

  • The Role of Affective Experience in Work Motivation

    Unknown

  • Third‐order Organizational Change and the Western Mystical Tradition

    Jean M. Bartunek;Michael K. Moch

  • Cheating the Fates: Organizational Foundings in the Wake of Demise

    Ian J. Walsh;Jean M. Bartunek

Frequent Co-Authors

Sara L. Rynes
Sara L. Rynes University of Iowa
Christopher B. Keys
Christopher B. Keys DePaul University
David Denyer
David Denyer Cranfield University
Jane E. Dutton
Jane E. Dutton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard W. Woodman
Richard W. Woodman Texas A&M University
Denise M. Rousseau
Denise M. Rousseau Carnegie Mellon University
Loizos Heracleous
Loizos Heracleous University of Warwick
Andrew D. Brown
Andrew D. Brown University of Bath
Kimberly D. Elsbach
Kimberly D. Elsbach University of California, Davis
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new career pathways for students pursuing Business and Management in the USA. Many learners opt for specialized programs that build on core business skills while targeting fast-growing industries.

A popular option is the construction management masters degree online, which suits those interested in leadership roles within the construction and real estate sectors. For professionals aiming for the highest echelons of management, executive mba online programs provide advanced business training without interrupting your career.

If cost is a major concern, a variety of affordable masters programs are available, allowing you to enhance your qualifications without significant financial burden. Additionally, for those attracted by technology and analytics, a masters in data analytics offers a route into the rapidly expanding field of big data and business intelligence.

Each of these online degrees provides flexible learning options and can lead to high-demand, well-compensated careers in today’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jean M. Bartunek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles