World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
12677
World Ranking
11391
National Ranking
217

Ricardo Amils publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Amils sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 640 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ricardo Amils D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Amils sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Ricardo Amils is affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain. Their research spans multiple scientific domains with a focus on environmental science, physics and astronomy, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their work is distributed across several subfields of study, including:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology
  • Spectroscopy
  • Atmospheric Science

Ricardo Amils has contributed extensively to specific research topics such as:

  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Astro and Planetary Science

The recent papers that include work relevant to Amils' research environment or fields are:

  • "Natural hydrogen in the energy transition: Fundamentals, promise, and enigmas" (2023) published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • "Scientific novelty beyond the experiment" (2023) published in Microbial Biotechnology
  • "Astrobiology of life on Earth" (2021) published in Environmental Microbiology
  • "A concept for international societally relevant microbiology education and microbiology knowledge promulgation in society" (2024) published in Microbial Biotechnology
  • "Role of biogenic Fe(III) minerals as a sink and carrier of heavy metals in the Rio Tinto, Spain" (2020) published in The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Muriel Gargaud
  • Henderson James Cleaves
  • William M. Irvine
  • Stéphane Tirard
  • Philippe Claeys

Their work is also represented heavily in key publication venues such as:

  • Microorganisms
  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Polymers
  • Scientific Reports

In 2016, Ricardo Amils was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea. This membership indicates engagement with leading European scientific communities.

Best Publications

  • Microbiology: eukaryotic diversity in Spain's River of Fire.

    Linda A. Amaral Zettler;Felipe Gómez;Erik Zettler;Erik Zettler;Brendan G. Keenan

  • Microbial Ecology of an Extreme Acidic Environment, the Tinto River

    E. González-Toril;E. Llobet-Brossa;E. O. Casamayor;R. Amann

  • Microbial Community Composition and Ecology of an Acidic Aquatic Environment: The Tinto River, Spain

    A.I. López-Archilla;I. Marin;R. Amils

  • The Río Tinto Basin, Spain: Mineralogy, sedimentary geobiology, and implications for interpretation of outcrop rocks at Meridiani Planum, Mars

    David C. Fernández-Remolar;Richard V. Morris;John E. Gruener;Ricardo Amils

  • Microbial diversity in anaerobic sediments at Rio Tinto, a naturally acidic environment with a high heavy metal content.

    Irene Sánchez-Andrea;Irene Sánchez-Andrea;Nuria Rodríguez;Ricardo Amils;Ricardo Amils;José Luis Sanz

  • Phenotypic properties and microbial diversity of methanogenic granules from a full-scale upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating brewery wastewater.

    Emiliano E. Díaz;Alfons J. M. Stams;Ricardo Amils;José L. Sanz

  • Inhibition of carbonate synthesis in acidic oceans on early Mars

    Alberto G. Fairén;David Fernández-Remolar;James M. Dohm;Victor R. Baker

  • Extreme environments as Mars terrestrial analogs: The Rio Tinto case

    Ricardo Amils;Ricardo Amils;Elena González-Toril;David Fernández-Remolar;Felipe Gómez

  • Astrobiology through the ages of Mars: the study of terrestrial analogues to understand the habitability of Mars.

    Alberto G. Fairén;Alfonso F. Davila;Darlene Lim;Nathan Bramall

  • The action of antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion process

    J. L. Sanz;N. Rodríguez;R. Amils

  • The limitations on organic detection in Mars-like soils by thermal volatilization-gas chromatography-MS and their implications for the Viking results.

    Rafael Navarro-González;Karina F. Navarro;José de la Rosa;Enrique Iñiguez

  • Phylogeny of Thiobacillus cuprinus and Other Mixotrophic Thiobacilli: Proposal for Thiomonas gen. nov.

    David Moreira;Ricardo Amils

  • Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface.

    Fernando Puente-Sánchez;Alejandro Arce-Rodríguez;Monike Oggerin;Miriam García-Villadangos

  • Electrochemical growth of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on a graphite electrode for obtaining a biocathode for direct electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen

    Sofía Carbajosa;Moustafá Malki;Renaud Caillard;María F. Lopez

  • Eukaryotic community distribution and its relationship to water physicochemical parameters in an extreme acidic environment, Rio Tinto (southwestern Spain).

    Angeles Aguilera;Susanna C. Manrubia;Felipe Gómez;Nuria Rodríguez

  • Stability against freezing of aqueous solutions on early Mars

    Alberto G. Fairén;Alfonso F. Davila;Luis Gago-Duport;Ricardo Amils

  • The Tinto River, an extreme acidic environment under control of iron, as an analog of the Terra Meridiani hematite site of Mars

    D. Fernández-Remolar;J. Gómez-Elvira;F. Gómez;E. Sebastian

  • Microbial community structure across the tree of life in the extreme Río Tinto

    Linda A Amaral-Zettler;Erik R Zettler;Erik R Zettler;Susanna M Theroux;Susanna M Theroux;Carmen Palacios

  • Geological record of an acidic environment driven by iron hydrochemistry: The Tinto River system

    David C. Fernández-Remolar;Nuria Rodriguez;Felipe Gómez;Ricardo Amils;Ricardo Amils

  • Microbial ecology of an extreme acidic environment, the Tinto river (vol 69, pg 4853, 2003)

    E. Gonzalez-Toril;E. Llobet-Brossa;E. O. Casamayor;R. Amann

Frequent Co-Authors

Nuria Rodríguez
Nuria Rodríguez Autonomous University of Madrid
Charles S. Cockell
Charles S. Cockell University of Edinburgh
José Luis Sanz
José Luis Sanz Autonomous University of Madrid
Alberto G. Fairén
Alberto G. Fairén Cornell University
Christopher P. McKay
Christopher P. McKay Ames Research Center
Frances Westall
Frances Westall Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Alfonso F. Davila
Alfonso F. Davila Ames Research Center
Linda A. Amaral-Zettler
Linda A. Amaral-Zettler University of Amsterdam
Dirk Schulze-Makuch
Dirk Schulze-Makuch Technical University of Berlin
James M. Dohm
James M. Dohm University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a variety of health science careers. Increasingly, students are pursuing online degrees leading to fast-growing professions like health information management (HIM) and medical coding. With flexible schedules and affordability, programs like a him degree online are gaining popularity among those balancing work, study, and family.

One in-demand pathway is becoming a certified coding specialist. Understanding the certified coding specialist role, including the differences between CPC and CCS certifications, can help you pick the right credential for your career goals. The journey to enter this field is also accessible—learn how long does it take to become a medical coder and start planning your next steps.

It’s also wise to weigh the medical billing and coding outlook before embarking on this career path. Growth is strong, and remote work opportunities are on the rise, but the job also comes with its own set of challenges. Exploring these online programs and career tracks can empower Biology and Biochemistry students to find rewarding roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo Amils

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles