World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 68 1502 1347 762 669 119 20138

Vittorio Sartorelli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vittorio Sartorelli between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vittorio Sartorelli published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 13 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1990 2025

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vittorio Sartorelli: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 4
1998 1
1999 5
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 1
2004 6
2005 2
2006 5
2007 2
2008 3
2009 1
2010 7
2011 7
2012 3
2013 13
2014 3
2015 6
2016 10
2017 5
2018 5
2019 5
2020 4
2021 4
2022 6
2023 3
2024 7
2025 6
Total 139
Download as CSV

Vittorio Sartorelli publications per year - data summary

  • Vittorio Sartorelli, a Molecular Biology scholar from National Institutes of Health, has 139 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992, 1993, 1994, 1998 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 36 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991, 1995 and 1996).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.2 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 26 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2001: 21 publications (1.8 per year); 2002-2013: 54 publications (4.5 per year); 2014-2025: 64 publications (5.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Vittorio Sartorelli publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vittorio Sartorelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 119 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 119
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Vittorio Sartorelli publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Vittorio Sartorelli, a Molecular Biology scholar from National Institutes of Health, records 119 publications - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Vittorio Sartorelli, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Vittorio Sartorelli ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Vittorio Sartorelli D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vittorio Sartorelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97 68
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Vittorio Sartorelli D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Vittorio Sartorelli, a Molecular Biology scholar from National Institutes of Health, records 68 D-Index - the 52nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 52% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Vittorio Sartorelli, and about 48% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Vittorio Sartorelli falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Vittorio Sartorelli is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular emphasis on Molecular Biology. Other subfields include Genetics, Physiology, Immunology, and Epidemiology.

The main topics addressed in their work span several areas such as Muscle Physiology and Disorders, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Pluripotent Stem Cells Research, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering.

Some recent publications by Vittorio Sartorelli include:

  • The JAK-STAT pathway at 30: Much learned, much more to do, 2022, Cell
  • Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome, 2020, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • FoxO maintains a genuine muscle stem-cell quiescent state until geriatric age, 2020, Nature Cell Biology
  • Dynamic sex chromosome expression in Drosophila male germ cells, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Rapid Enhancer Remodeling and Transcription Factor Repurposing Enable High Magnitude Gene Induction upon Acute Activation of NK Cells, 2020, Immunity

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sartorelli include Stefania Dell'Orso, Kyung Dae Ko, Kan Jiang, Veronica Ciuffoli, and Xuesong Feng.

Their work is frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), STAR Protocols, Genes & Development, Nature Communications, and Trends in Molecular Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Glucose Restriction Inhibits Skeletal Myoblast Differentiation by Activating SIRT1 through AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Nampt

    Marcella Fulco;Yana Cen;Po Zhao;Eric P. Hoffman

  • Sir2 Regulates Skeletal Muscle Differentiation as a Potential Sensor of the Redox State

    Marcella Fulco;R.Louis Schiltz;Simona Iezzi;M.Todd King

  • The Polycomb Ezh2 methyltransferase regulates muscle gene expression and skeletal muscle differentiation

    Giuseppina Caretti;Monica Di Padova;Bruce Micales;Gary E. Lyons

  • twist is a potential oncogene that inhibits apoptosis

    Roberta Maestro;Angelo P. Dei Tos;Yasuo Hamamori;Svetlana Krasnokutsky

  • The NAD+-Dependent SIRT1 Deacetylase Translates a Metabolic Switch into Regulatory Epigenetics in Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells

    James G. Ryall;Stefania Dell’Orso;Assia Derfoul;Aster Juan

  • Differential roles of p300 and PCAF acetyltransferases in muscle differentiation

    Pier Lorenzo Puri;Pier Lorenzo Puri;Vittorio Sartorelli;Vittorio Sartorelli;Xiang Jiao Yang;Yasuo Hamamori

  • eRNAs Promote Transcription by Establishing Chromatin Accessibility at Defined Genomic Loci

    Kambiz Mousavi;Hossein Zare;Stefania Dell’Orso;Lars Grontved

  • Regulation of the p300 HAT domain via a novel activation loop

    Paul R Thompson;Paul R Thompson;Dongxia Wang;Ling Wang;Marcella Fulco

  • Regulation of Histone Acetyltransferases p300 and PCAF by the bHLH Protein Twist and Adenoviral Oncoprotein E1A

    Yasuo Hamamori;Vittorio Sartorelli;Vasily Ogryzko;Pier Lorenzo Puri;Pier Lorenzo Puri

  • H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase MLL4 is required for enhancer activation during cell differentiation

    Ji Eun Lee;Chaochen Wang;Shiliyang Xu;Shiliyang Xu;Young-Wook Cho

  • BACH2 represses effector programs to stabilize T reg -mediated immune homeostasis

    Rahul Roychoudhuri;Kiyoshi Hirahara;Kiyoshi Hirahara;Kambiz Mousavi;David Clever

  • Molecular mechanisms of myogenic coactivation by p300: direct interaction with the activation domain of MyoD and with the MADS box of MEF2C.

    V Sartorelli;J Huang;Y Hamamori;L Kedes

  • Acetylation of MyoD Directed by PCAF Is Necessary for the Execution of the Muscle Program

    Vittorio Sartorelli;Pier Lorenzo Puri;Pier Lorenzo Puri;Yasuo Hamamori;Vasily Ogryzko

  • TNF/p38α/Polycomb Signaling to Pax7 Locus in Satellite Cells Links Inflammation to the Epigenetic Control of Muscle Regeneration

    Daniela Palacios;Chiara Mozzetta;Silvia Consalvi;Giuseppina Caretti;Giuseppina Caretti

  • DNA Damage-Dependent Acetylation of p73 Dictates the Selective Activation of Apoptotic Target Genes

    Antonio Costanzo;Antonio Costanzo;Paola Merlo;Natalia Pediconi;Marcella Fulco

  • Muscle-specific expression of the cardiac alpha-actin gene requires MyoD1, CArG-box binding factor, and Sp1.

    Vittorio Sartorelli;Keith A. Webster;Larry Kedes

  • Mir-214-Dependent Regulation of the Polycomb Protein Ezh2 in Skeletal Muscle and Embryonic Stem Cells

    Aster H. Juan;Roshan M. Kumar;Joseph G. Marx;Richard A. Young

  • STATs shape the active enhancer landscape of T cell populations.

    Golnaz Vahedi;Hayato Takahashi;Shingo Nakayamada;Hong-wei Sun

  • Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells

    Golnaz Vahedi;Yuka Kanno;Yasuko Furumoto;Kan Jiang

  • Functional and morphological recovery of dystrophic muscles in mice treated with deacetylase inhibitors.

    G C Minetti;C Colussi;R Adami;C Serra

Frequent Co-Authors

Pier Lorenzo Puri
Pier Lorenzo Puri Discovery Institute
Larry Kedes
Larry Kedes University of Southern California
Eric P. Hoffman
Eric P. Hoffman Binghamton University
John J. O'Shea
John J. O'Shea National Institutes of Health
Yuka Kanno
Yuka Kanno National Institutes of Health
Hong-Wei Sun
Hong-Wei Sun National Institutes of Health
Marco Sandri
Marco Sandri University of Padua
Kai Ge
Kai Ge National Institutes of Health
Cristiano Simone
Cristiano Simone University of Bari Aldo Moro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to exciting research and laboratory roles, there are also related online degrees that can broaden your career options. For students interested in the psychological and counseling aspects of science, exploring the online masters degree in mental health counseling provides an understanding of mental wellness, therapeutic techniques, and patient support.

Those searching for lucrative and impactful roles might consider the highest paying forensic psychology jobs, which offer a fascinating blend of science, law, and psychology. Alternatively, if you are passionate about working with young people, pursuing an advanced degree through child psychology masters programs can help you support child and adolescent development.

Affordability is also a key concern for many students. If you wish to build a career in counseling while managing your education costs, researching the cheapest masters in counseling online can help you achieve your goals in a cost-effective way.

Best Scientists Citing Vittorio Sartorelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles