World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 57 630 584 276 251 126 33451

Sara L. Rynes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sara L. Rynes between 1980 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sara L. Rynes published across 39 years, from 1980 to 2018, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2003. 3 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2003. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 8 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication
1980 2018

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sara L. Rynes: publications per year, 1980 to 2018
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 8
1984 2
1985 3
1986 3
1987 6
1988 2
1989 6
1990 3
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 2
2001 6
2002 5
2003 10
2004 3
2005 8
2006 7
2007 10
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 3
2012 7
2013 3
2014 4
2015 3
2016 3
2017 2
2018 1
Total 139
Download as CSV

Sara L. Rynes publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara L. Rynes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 125–129 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 126 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93 126
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Sara L. Rynes D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara L. Rynes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44 57
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Sara L. Rynes is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their academic contributions are recognized in management and organizational studies, as indicated by their appointment as a Dean of Fellow in the Academy of Management.

Their work spans several domains in social sciences, with a focus likely related to organizational behavior, human resources, and management practice. Although specific papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not listed, their membership and recognition by the Academy of Management situate their research within key leadership and management discourse.

Sara L. Rynes's recognition as a Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management, marks a notable professional distinction within the academic community focused on management science and organizational studies.

Best Publications

  • Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis

    Marc Orlitzky;Frank L. Schmidt;Sara L. Rynes

  • Recruitment, Job Choice, and Post-Hire Consequences: A Call For New Research Directions

    Sara L. Rynes

  • Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics

    Sara L. Rynes;Jean M. Bartunek;Richard L. Daft

  • The Importance of Recruitment in Job Choice: A Different Way of Looking

    Sara L. Rynes;Robert D. Bretz Jr.;Barry A. Gerhart

  • Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications

    Barry A. Gerhart;Sara L. Rynes

  • The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do

    Sara L. Rynes;Barry Gerhart;Kathleen A. Minette

  • Applicant Attraction Strategies: An Organizational Perspective

    Sara L. Rynes;Alison E. Barber

  • HR professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice.

    Sara L. Rynes;Amy E. Colbert;Kenneth G. Brown

  • Personnel Psychology: Performance Evaluation and Pay for Performance

    Sara L. Rynes;Barry Gerhart;Laura Parks

  • What Makes Management Research Interesting, And Why Does It Matter?

    Jean M. Bartunek;Sara L. Rynes;R. Duane Ireland

  • The Very Separate Worlds Of Academic And Practitioner Periodicals In Human Resource Management: Implications For Evidence-Based Management

    Sara L. Rynes;Tamara L. Giluk;Kenneth G. Brown

  • Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike: The Paradoxes of Academic–Practitioner Relationships

    Jean Marie Bartunek;Sara Lynn Rynes

  • INTERVIEWER ASSESSMENTS OF APPLICANT “FIT”: AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION

    Sara L. Rynes;Barry A. Gerhart

  • A FIELD SURVEY OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE ADOPTION AND PERCEIVED SUCCESS OF DIVERSITY TRAINING

    Sara L. Rynes;Benson Rosen

  • ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE: KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN PRACTITIONERS AND ACADEMICS.

    Unknown

  • What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal?

    Timothy A. Judge;Daniel M. Cable;Amy E. Colbert;Sara L. Rynes

  • Recruiter and Job Influences on Candidates for Employment

    Sara L. Rynes;Howard E. Miller

  • Recruitment Research in the Twenty-First Century

    Sara L. Rynes;Daniel M. Cable

  • Care and Compassion Through an Organizational Lens: Opening Up New Possibilities

    Sara L. Rynes;Jean M. Bartunek;Jane E. Dutton;Joshua D. Margolis

  • Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates.

    Barry Gerhart;Sara L. Rynes

  • Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis.

    John W. Boudreau;Sara L. Rynes

  • Who moved our cheese? Reclaiming professionalism in business education

    Christine Quinn Trank;Sara L. Rynes

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean M. Bartunek
Jean M. Bartunek Boston College
Barry Gerhart
Barry Gerhart University of Wisconsin–Madison
Benson Rosen
Benson Rosen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John W. Boudreau
John W. Boudreau University of Southern California
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Daniel M. Cable
Daniel M. Cable London Business School
Amy J. Hillman
Amy J. Hillman Arizona State University
Bradley L. Kirkman
Bradley L. Kirkman North Carolina State University
R. Duane Ireland
R. Duane Ireland Texas A&M University
Jane E. Dutton
Jane E. Dutton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online business and management degrees opens doors to a diverse range of specializations and career options. From accelerated programs to terminal degrees, students can tailor their educational journey to fit personal goals and career demands.

For those aiming for leadership roles, a doctorate in organizational leadership online equips graduates with skills to head teams, drive organizational change, and influence industry standards. If you’re considering which institutions to trust, the best online schools offer flexibility, accreditation, and reputable faculty for a quality educational experience.

Business management skills are also transferable to fields such as construction and healthcare. Earning a construction project management degree online can lead to overseeing complex building projects and managing large teams. Meanwhile, an online degree for healthcare administration prepares students to navigate the fast-paced, evolving world of healthcare leadership.

These online pathways allow for motivated professionals to upskill, transition, or specialize in critical business sectors from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Sara L. Rynes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles