World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11544
World Ranking
5865
National Ranking
3181

Scott Highhouse publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Highhouse sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Scott Highhouse D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Highhouse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott Highhouse is affiliated with Bowling Green State University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Clinical Psychology.

The research topics focus on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Personality Traits and Psychology, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Aesthetic Perception and Analysis, Digital Media and Visual Art, as well as Innovation and Knowledge Management.

Recent papers by Scott Highhouse include:

  • Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork, 2023, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members, 2020, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Is risk propensity unique from the big five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation, 2022, Journal of Research in Personality
  • Improving Workplace Judgments by Reducing Noise: Lessons Learned from a Century of Selection Research, 2022, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • A simple solution to a complex problem: Manipulate the mediator!, 2021, Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Margaret E. Brooks
  • Sarah R. Melick
  • Marie Childers
  • Sami Nesnidol
  • Andrew Samo

Scott Highhouse's publications have appeared in several key venues such as:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • International Journal of Selection and Assessment
  • The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Journal of Research in Personality

Best Publications

  • The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer.

    Filip Lievens;Scott Highhouse

  • Measuring Attraction to Organizations

    Scott Highhouse;Filip Lievens;Evan F. Sinar

  • Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection.

    Scott Highhouse

  • Personality trait inferences about organizations: development of a measure and assessment of construct validity.

    Jerel E. Slaughter;Michael J. Zickar;Scott Highhouse;David C. Mohr

  • Social-Identity Functions of Attraction to Organizations.

    Scott Highhouse;Erin E. Thornbury;Ian S. Little

  • An Organizational Impression Management Perspective on the Formation of Corporate Reputations

    Scott Highhouse;Margaret E. Brooks;Gary J. Gregarus

  • Designing Experiments That Generalize

    Scott Highhouse

  • ASSESSING COMPANY EMPLOYMENT IMAGE: AN EXAMPLE IN THE FAST FOOD INDUSTRY

    Scott Highhouse;Michael J. Zickar;Todd J. Thorsteinson;Sandra L. Stierwalt

  • Are Maximizers Really Unhappy? The Measurement of Maximizing Tendency

    Scott Edward Highhouse;Dalia L. Diab;Michael A. Gillespie

  • Context-Dependent Selection: The Effects of Decoy and Phantom Job Candidates

    Scott Highhouse

  • EFFECTS OF ADVERTISED HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ATTRACTION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN APPLICANTS

    Scott Highhouse;Sandra L. Stierwalt;Peter Bachiochi;Allison E. Elder

  • Familiarity, ambivalence, and firm reputation: is corporate fame a double-edged sword?

    Margaret E. Brooks;Scott Highhouse;Steven S. Russell;David C. Mohr

  • Relation of job search and choice process with subsequent satisfaction

    Craig D. Crossley;Scott Highhouse

  • Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior

    Scott Highhouse;Payam Yüce

  • ASSESSING THE CANDIDATE AS A WHOLE: A HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR PERSONNEL DECISION MAKING

    Scott Highhouse

  • Examining corporate reputation judgments with generalizability theory.

    Scott Highhouse;Alison Broadfoot;Jennifer E. Yugo;Shelba A. Devendorf

  • Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS)

    Don C. Zhang;Scott Highhouse;Christopher D. Nye

  • Essentials of Personnel Assessment and Selection

    Scott Highhouse;Dennis Doverspike;Robert M Guion

  • Applicant–employee similarity and attraction to an employer

    Shelba A. Devendorf;Scott Highhouse

  • Would you work if you won the lottery? Tracking changes in the American work ethic.

    Scott Highhouse;Michael J. Zickar;Maya Yankelevich

  • The importance of traits and abilities in supervisors' hirability decisions as a function of method of assessment

    Filip Lievens;Scott Highhouse;Wilfried De Corte

  • Industrial and organizational psychology

    Neal Schmitt;Scott Highhouse

Frequent Co-Authors

Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Reeshad S. Dalal
Reeshad S. Dalal George Mason University
Daniel R. Ilgen
Daniel R. Ilgen Michigan State University
Charlie L. Reeve
Charlie L. Reeve University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Russell A. Matthews
Russell A. Matthews University of Alabama
Nathan R. Kuncel
Nathan R. Kuncel University of Minnesota
Walter C. Borman
Walter C. Borman University of South Florida
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career paths. From mental health counseling to behavioral psychology, students can specialize in diverse fields. If you’re interested in helping people cope with life’s challenges, you may want to become a mental health counselor in Winston Salem or in other states, a path that often requires graduate study and licensure.

Careers working with behavioral issues, such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), are also in demand. Prospective students frequently research the average salary by state for aba to assess earning potential. Similarly, specialists may be interested in exploring behavioral psychologist salary information before committing to this path.

An advanced degree opens even more avenues. Those holding a master’s in clinical psychology can find guidance through resources like msc psychology career options, highlighting roles in counseling, research, and specialized therapy. No matter your focus, online psychology programs are designed to diversify your knowledge and align with evolving career pathways in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Highhouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles