World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernhard Höfle

Bernhard Höfle

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6224
World Ranking
9350
National Ranking
462

Bernhard Höfle publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Höfle sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bernhard Höfle D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Höfle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernhard Höfle is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany, where a significant portion of their research has been conducted and published. Their work primarily focuses on the application of remote sensing technologies and 3D surveying methods in environmental and earth sciences.

The scientist has contributed extensively to fields such as Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. More specifically, Höfle's research encompasses subfields including Environmental Engineering, Geology, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research interests can be further detailed through the main topics they have covered which include:

  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Bernhard Höfle has published within a variety of venues, demonstrating a focus on both institutional and international journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • heiDOK (Heidelberg University)
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • Earth Surface Dynamics

Their publication record contains research papers such as:

  • "Virtual laser scanning with HELIOS++: A novel take on ray tracing-based simulation of topographic full-waveform 3D laser scanning" (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • "Individual tree point clouds and tree measurements from multi-platform laser scanning in German forests" (2022, Earth system science data)
  • "Analysis of the backscattered energy in terrestrial laser scanning data" (2025, heiDOK (Heidelberg University))
  • "M3C2-EP: Pushing the limits of 3D topographic point cloud change detection by error propagation" (2021, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing)
  • "Tree species classification based on full-waveform airborne laser scanning data" (2025, heiDOK (Heidelberg University))

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Höfle's scholarly activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Katharina Anders
  • Lukas Winiwarter
  • Hannah Weiser
  • Martin Rutzinger
  • Vivien Zahs

Best Publications

  • Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches

    Bernhard Höfle;Norbert Pfeifer

  • Multisource and Multitemporal Data Fusion in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review of the State of the Art

    Pedram Ghamisi;Behnood Rasti;Naoto Yokoya;Qunming Wang

  • Beyond 3-D: The New Spectrum of Lidar Applications for Earth and Ecological Sciences

    Jan U.H. Eitel;Bernhard Höfle;Lee A. Vierling;Antonio Abellán

  • Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Fusion Using Extinction Profiles and Deep Convolutional Neural Network

    Pedram Ghamisi;Bernhard Hofle;Xiao Xiang Zhu

  • Water surface mapping from airborne laser scanning using signal intensity and elevation data

    Bernhard Höfle;Michael Vetter;Norbert Pfeifer;Gottfried Mandlburger

  • Urban vegetation detection using radiometrically calibrated small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data

    Bernhard Höfle;Markus Hollaus;Julian Hagenauer

  • Automatic roof plane detection and analysis in airborne lidar point clouds for solar potential assessment.

    Andreas Jochem;Bernhard Höfle;Martin Rutzinger;Norbert Pfeifer

  • Topographic airborne LiDAR in geomorphology: A technological perspective

    Bernhard Höfle;Martin Rutzinger

  • Object-Based Point Cloud Analysis of Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Urban Vegetation Classification

    Martin Rutzinger;Bernhard Höfle;Markus Hollaus;Norbert Pfeifer

  • Ontology-Based Classification of Building Types Detected from Airborne Laser Scanning Data

    Mariana Belgiu;Ivan Tomljenovic;Thomas J. Lampoltshammer;Thomas Blaschke

  • Virtual laser scanning with HELIOS++: A novel take on ray tracing-based simulation of topographic full-waveform 3D laser scanning

    Lukas Winiwarter;Alberto Manuel Esmorís Pena;Hannah Weiser;Katharina Anders;Katharina Anders

  • Methods to measure potential spatial access to delivery care in low- and middle-income countries: a case study in rural Ghana

    Robin C Nesbitt;Sabine Gabrysch;Alexandra Laub;Seyi Soremekun

  • Analysis of the backscattered energy in terrestrial laser scanning data

    N. Pfeifer;B. Höfle;C. Briese;M. Rutzinger

  • Building Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanning Data: An Analysis of the State of the Art

    Ivan Tomljenovic;Bernhard Höfle;Dirk Tiede;Thomas Blaschke

  • Radiometric Correction of Terrestrial LiDAR Point Cloud Data for Individual Maize Plant Detection

    Bernhard Hofle

  • Extraction of Vertical Walls from Mobile Laser Scanning Data for Solar Potential Assessment

    Andreas Jochem;Bernhard Höfle;Martin Rutzinger

  • Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling

    G. Mandlburger;C. Hauer;B. Höfle;H. Habersack

  • Tree species classification based on full-waveform airborne laser scanning data

    M. Hollaus;W. Mücke;B. Höfle;W. Dorigo

  • Calibration of full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for object classification

    Christian Briese;Bernhard Höfle;Hubert Lehner;Wolfgang Wagner

  • GIS-Based Roughness Derivation for Flood Simulations: A Comparison of Orthophotos, LiDAR and Crowdsourced Geodata

    Helen Dorn;Michael Vetter;Bernhard Höfle

  • Boosting the predictive accuracy of urban hedonic house price models through airborne laser scanning

    Marco Helbich;Andreas Jochem;Werner Mücke;Bernhard Höfle

  • Multisource and Multitemporal Data Fusion in Remote Sensing.

    Pedram Ghamisi;Behnood Rasti;Naoto Yokoya;Qunming Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia Boike
Julia Boike Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Norbert Frank
Norbert Frank Heidelberg University
Alexander Zipf
Alexander Zipf Heidelberg University
Philip Marsh
Philip Marsh Wilfrid Laurier University
Moritz Langer
Moritz Langer Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Pedram Ghamisi
Pedram Ghamisi Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Thomas Blaschke
Thomas Blaschke University of Salzburg
Lorenzo Bruzzone
Lorenzo Bruzzone University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a broad range of online degrees and career pathways in science, technology, and engineering. Students looking to expand their expertise can consider specialized online options that not only enhance technical knowledge but also improve employability in competitive job markets.

For those interested in interdisciplinary studies, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering is an affordable way to gain crucial skills in sustainability and technology. Engineering enthusiasts can take advantage of the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online programs to delve into robotics, design, or manufacturing from anywhere in the world.

Similarly, a physics degree online offers strong analytical foundations for diverse tech roles, including scientific research and computational modeling. Meanwhile, aspiring data specialists can position themselves for high-growth careers by pursuing the cheapest master in data science programs.

These degrees provide flexible, accessible ways to broaden your career options and compete in dynamic technology-driven fields.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Höfle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles