World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
24505
World Ranking
16627
National Ranking
872

Ursula Krämer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ursula Krämer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 291 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ursula Krämer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ursula Krämer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ursula Krämer is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on health professions, medicine, and social sciences. Within these broad areas, Krämer has contributed to specific subfields such as general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, political science and international relations, speech and hearing, and epidemiology.

Their work addresses several key topics, including health and medical studies, medical and health sciences research, historical influence and diplomacy, school health and nursing education, chronic disease management strategies, the Delphi technique in research, and clinical practice guidelines implementation.

Krämer's scholarly output includes publications in prominent venues, with a particular concentration in "Das Gesundheitswesen" and contributions to "Monitor Versorgungsforschung."

  • DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) - Hintergrund, Relevanz, Gegenstand und Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung (2020), Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Das Gesundheitsdatennutzungsgesetz - Potenzial für eine bessere Forschung und Gesundheitsversorgung (2023), Das Gesundheitswesen
  • DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) - Hintergrund, Relevanz, Gegenstand und Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung: Kurzfassung (2020), Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Digitale Transformation des Gesundheitswesens - eine Delphi-Studie der Arbeitsgruppen Digital Health und Validierung und Linkage von Sekundärdaten des Deutschen Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung (DNVF) (2022), Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Bewerten, aber wie? - Kriterien für die Evaluation und das Reporting von Studien zu Gesundheits- und Medizin-Apps (2021), Monitor Versorgungsforschung

Collaboration is evident in Krämer's frequent co-authorship with several researchers, including Horst Christian Vollmar, Nicole Ernstmann, Ullrich Bauer, Eva-Maria Berens, and Eva Maria Bitzer. These collaborations highlight interdisciplinary research efforts within health-related and social science domains.

  • Horst Christian Vollmar
  • Nicole Ernstmann
  • Ullrich Bauer
  • Eva-Maria Berens
  • Eva Maria Bitzer

Best Publications

  • Effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on natural-cause mortality : An analysis of 22 European cohorts within the multicentre ESCAPE project

    Rob Beelen;Ole Raaschou-Nielsen;Massimo Stafoggia;Zorana Jovanovic Andersen

  • Chronic rhinosinusitis in Europe : an underestimated disease. A GA²LEN study

    D Hastan;WJ Fokkens;Claus Bachert;RB Newson

  • Atopic Diseases, Allergic Sensitization, and Exposure to Traffic-related Air Pollution in Children

    Verena Morgenstern;Anne Zutavern;Josef Cyrys;Inken Brockow

  • Asthma in adults and its association with chronic rhinosinusitis: The GA2LEN survey in Europe

    Deborah Jarvis;Roger Newson;Jan Lotvall;Deniz Hastan

  • Ambient air pollution and low birthweight: a European cohort study (ESCAPE)

    Marie Pedersen;Lise Giorgis-Allemand;Claire Bernard;Inmaculada Aguilera

  • Age of entry to day nursery and allergy in later childhood

    U Krämer;J Heinrich;M Wjst;H E Wichmann

  • Long-term air pollution exposure and living close to busy roads are associated with COPD in women.

    Tamara Schikowski;Dorothea Sugiri;Ulrich Ranft;Ulrike Gehring;Ulrike Gehring

  • Environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and quality of the home environment: effects on psychodevelopment in early childhood

    Jens Walkowiak;Jörg-A Wiener;Annemarie Fastabend;Birger Heinzow

  • Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the SALIA Cohort Study

    Ursula Krämer;Christian Herder;Dorothea Sugiri;Klaus Strassburger

  • Long-term exposure to traffic-related particulate matter impairs cognitive function in the elderly.

    Ulrich Ranft;Tamara Schikowski;Dorothee Sugiri;Jean Krutmann

  • Adult lung function and long-term air pollution exposure. ESCAPE: a multicentre cohort study and meta-analysis

    Martin Adam;Martin Adam;Tamara Schikowski;Anne Elie Carsin;Yutong Cai

  • Traffic-related air pollution is associated with atopy in children living in urban areas.

    Ursula Krämer;Thilo Koch;Ulrich Ranft;Johannes Ring

  • Long-term exposure to air pollution and cardiovascular mortality: an analysis of 22 European cohorts.

    Rob Beelen;Massimo Stafoggia;Ole Raaschou-Nielsen;Zorana Jovanovic Andersen

  • Does Pet Ownership in Infancy Lead to Asthma or Allergy at School Age? Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data from 11 European Birth Cohorts

    Karin C Lødrup Carlsen;Stephanie Roll;Kai-Håkon Carlsen;Kai-Håkon Carlsen;Petter Mowinckel

  • Birth weight and prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE): a meta-analysis within 12 European Birth Cohorts

    Eva Govarts;Mark Nieuwenhuijsen;Greet Schoeters;Greet Schoeters;Ferran Ballester

  • Genome-wide scan on total serum IgE levels identifies FCER1A as novel susceptibility locus.

    Stephan Weidinger;Christian Gieger;Elke Rodriguez;Hansjörg Baurecht

  • Air pollution and respiratory infections during early childhood: an analysis of 10 European birth cohorts within the ESCAPE Project

    Elaina A. MacIntyre;Ulrike Gehring;Anna Mölter;Elaine Fuertes

  • Preventive effect of hydrolyzed infant formulas persists until age 6 years: long-term results from the German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study (GINI).

    Andrea von Berg;Birgit Filipiak-Pittroff;Ursula Krämer;Elke Link

  • Why are allergies increasing

    Johannes Ring;Ursula Krämer;Torsten Schäfer;Heidrun Behrendt

  • Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Cardiopulmonary Mortality in Women

    Ulrike Gehring;Joachim Heinrich;Ursula Krämer;Veit Grote

Frequent Co-Authors

Joachim Heinrich
Joachim Heinrich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Heidrun Behrendt
Heidrun Behrendt Technical University of Munich
Sibylle Koletzko
Sibylle Koletzko University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Nicole Probst-Hensch
Nicole Probst-Hensch Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Ming-Yi Tsai
Ming-Yi Tsai University of Washington
Bert Brunekreef
Bert Brunekreef Utrecht University
Irina Lehmann
Irina Lehmann Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Barbara Hoffmann
Barbara Hoffmann Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Nino Künzli
Nino Künzli University of Basel
Marloes Eeftens
Marloes Eeftens Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring healthcare careers in the USA extends beyond studying traditional Medicine. Many students and professionals consider alternative pathways like nursing or advanced practice degrees, especially through online or hybrid programs designed for flexibility and affordability.

If you’re a registered nurse hoping to advance your qualifications, rn to bsn online programs offer a convenient route to boost your credentials while balancing work and study. For those aiming to further specialize or move into research and leadership roles, enrolling in phd in nursing online programs can provide access to advanced career opportunities without the need to relocate.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds might consider online direct entry msn degrees, which enable a faster transition into nursing with a master’s qualification. Additionally, those looking for accessible entry points into the nursing profession can review the easiest nursing schools to get into, which helps demystify the admissions process and open new doors in healthcare.

These online options and alternate career pathways make pursuing a rewarding role in healthcare more accessible than ever, meeting the evolving demands of medicine and patient care in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Ursula Krämer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles