World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
11601
World Ranking
4569
National Ranking
201

Alexander Zipf publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Zipf sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alexander Zipf D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Zipf sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Zipf is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the field of Social Sciences. Their work primarily spans subfields such as Transportation, Geography, Planning and Development, Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research topics cover a wide range of areas related to geographic information and urban environments, including Geographic Information Systems Studies, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Automated Road and Building Extraction, Data Management and Algorithms, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Remote-Sensing Image Classification, and Data-Driven Disease Surveillance.

Zipf's recent publications demonstrate a focus on remote sensing, urban data, and volunteered geographic information. Notable papers include:

  • Cross-city matters: A multimodal remote sensing benchmark dataset for cross-city semantic segmentation using high-resolution domain adaptation networks (2023, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and inequalities of global urban building data in OpenStreetMap (2023, Nature Communications)
  • The evolution of humanitarian mapping within the OpenStreetMap community (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Volunteered geographic information research in the first decade: a narrative review of selected journal articles in GIScience (2020, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems)
  • Mapping Public Urban Green Spaces Based on OpenStreetMap and Sentinel-2 Imagery Using Belief Functions (2021, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information)

The scientist frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, including Sven Lautenbach, Christina Ludwig, Hao Li, Benjamin Herfort, and Michael Schultz.

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • AGILE GIScience Series
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions in GIS
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007-2011

    Pascal Neis;Dennis Zielstra;Alexander Zipf

  • Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap

    Hongchao Fan;Alexander Zipf;Qing Fu;Pascal Neis

  • A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality Analysis

    Christopher Barron;Pascal Neis;Alexander Zipf

  • A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management

    João Porto de Albuquerque;Benjamin Herfort;Alexander Brenning;Alexander Zipf

  • Analyzing the Contributor Activity of a Volunteered Geographic Information Project — The Case of OpenStreetMap

    Pascal Neis;Alexander Zipf

  • A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany

    Dennis Zielstra;Alexander Zipf

  • DEEP MAP: Challenging IT Research In The Framework Of A Tourist Information System

    Rainer Malaka;Alexander Zipf

  • User-Adaptive Maps for Location-Based Services (LBS) for Tourism.

    Alexander Zipf

  • Generating web-based 3D City Models from OpenStreetMap: The current situation in Germany

    Martin Over;Arne Schilling;S. Neubauer;Alexander Zipf

  • Fine-resolution population mapping using OpenStreetMap points-of-interest

    Mohamed Bakillah;Steve Liang;Amin Mobasheri;Jamal Jokar Arsanjani

  • Intelligent systems for tourism

    S. Stabb;H. Werther;F. Ricci;A. Zipf

  • Neural correlates of individual differences in affective benefit of real-life urban green space exposure.

    Heike Tost;Markus Reichert;Markus Reichert;Urs Braun;Iris Reinhard

  • An Advanced Systematic Literature Review on Spatiotemporal Analyses of Twitter Data

    Enrico Steiger;João Porto de Albuquerque;Alexander Zipf

  • Location-based mobile tourist services - first user experiences.

    Barbara Schmidt-Belz;Heimo Laamanen;Stefan Poslad;Alexander Zipf

  • Twitter as an indicator for whereabouts of people? Correlating Twitter with UK census data

    Enrico Steiger;René Westerholt;Bernd Resch;Alexander Zipf

  • Comparison of Volunteered Geographic Information Data Contributions and Community Development for Selected World Regions

    Pascal Neis;Dennis Zielstra;Alexander Zipf

  • Map-based Mobile Services: Theories, Methods and Implementations

    Liqiu Meng;Alexander Zipf;Tumasch Reichenbacher

  • Toward mapping land-use patterns from volunteered geographic information

    Jamal Jokar Arsanjani;Marco Helbich;Mohamed Bakillah;Julian Hagenauer

  • Exploration of spatiotemporal and semantic clusters of Twitter data using unsupervised neural networks

    Enrico Steiger;Bernd Resch;Alexander Zipf

  • Road-based travel recommendation using geo-tagged images

    Yeran Sun Sun;Hongchao Fan;Mohamed Bakillah;Alexander Zipf

  • The use of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) and Crowdsourcing in Disaster Management: a Systematic Literature Review.

    Flávio Eduardo Aoki Horita;Lívia Castro Degrossi;Luiz Fernando Ferreira Gomes de Assis;Alexander Zipf

  • OpenStreetMap in GIScience: Experiences, Research, and Applications

    Jamal Jokar Arsanjani;Alexander Zipf;Peter Mooney;Marco Helbich

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Heidelberg University
Heike Tost
Heike Tost Heidelberg University
Marco Helbich
Marco Helbich Utrecht University
Bernhard Höfle
Bernhard Höfle Heidelberg University
Bin Jiang
Bin Jiang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Till Bärnighausen
Till Bärnighausen Heidelberg University
Linda See
Linda See International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Alexander Brenning
Alexander Brenning Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Wolff Schlotz
Wolff Schlotz Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a variety of degree options and career pathways. Many students begin their journey with the easiest associate degree to get, which can lead to quick entry-level opportunities in tech fields. This path is ideal for those seeking a fast and affordable start.

If you’re considering further education, there are many affordable master's degrees online. These programs help candidates stand out in competitive job markets while balancing work or family commitments.

For aspiring leaders, specialized doctorates are available. The doctorate organizational leadership online is great for those aiming to lead teams or drive innovation within tech environments. Those interested in academia or high-level education roles can also consider the cheapest doctorate of education online to further boost their credentials.

Choosing the right online degree can support a variety of career paths in tech and leadership, making advanced study both accessible and practical for today’s learners.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Zipf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles