World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
9549
World Ranking
5136
National Ranking
75

Jantien Stoter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jantien Stoter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 320 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jantien Stoter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jantien Stoter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Jantien Stoter is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research lies primarily in engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with a strong emphasis on building and construction, geology, geochemistry and petrology, environmental engineering, and geography, planning and development.

Their scholarly work focuses on various specialized topics including:

  • 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • BIM and Construction Integration
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

Jantien Stoter has contributed to multiple frequently published venues including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions in GIS

Frequent collaborators in their publications include Ken Arroyo Ohori, Francesca Noardo, Filip Biljecki, Claire Ellul, and Thomas Krijnen.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jantien Stoter include:

  • Challenges of urban digital twins: A systematic review and a Delphi expert survey, 2023, Automation in Construction
  • City3D: Large-Scale Building Reconstruction from Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • Automated 3D Reconstruction of LoD2 and LoD1 Models for All 10 Million Buildings of the Netherlands, 2022, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
  • Tools for BIM-GIS Integration (IFC Georeferencing and Conversions): Results from the GeoBIM Benchmark 2019, 2020, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • 3D building metrics for urban morphology, 2022, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems

Best Publications

  • Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review

    Filip Biljecki;Jantien E. Stoter;Hugo Ledoux;Sisi Zlatanova

  • An improved LOD specification for 3D building models

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • 3D Cadastre in an International Context : Legal, Organizational, and Technological Aspects

    Jantien E. Stoter;Peter van Oosterom

  • Formalisation of the level of detail in 3D city modelling

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter;Junqiao Zhao;Junqiao Zhao

  • The core cadastral domain model

    Peter van Oosterom;Christiaan Lemmen;Tryggvi Ingvarsson;Paul van der Molen

  • Modelling 3D spatial objects in a geo-DBMS using a 3D primitive

    Clin Arens;Jantien Stoter;Peter van Oosterom

  • Noise mapping and GIS: optimising quality and efficiency of noise effect studies

    Henk de Kluijver;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Generating 3D city models without elevation data

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Automatic conversion of IFC datasets to geometrically and semantically correct CityGML LOD3 buildings

    Sjors Donkers;Hugo Ledoux;Junqiao Zhao;Jantien E. Stoter

  • TOWARDS A 3D CADASTRE: WHERE DO CADASTRAL NEEDS AND TECHNICAL POSSIBILITIES MEET?

    Jantien E. Stoter;Martin Salzmann

  • Building pattern recognition in topographic data: examples on collinear and curvilinear alignments

    Xiang Zhang;Tinghua Ai;Jantien Stoter;Menno-Jan Kraak

  • Automated 3D reconstruction of LoD2 and LoD1 models for all 10 million buildings of the Netherlands

    Unknown

  • AdTree: Accurate, Detailed, and Automatic Modelling of Laser-Scanned Trees

    Shenglan Du;Roderik Lindenbergh;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • 3D noise mapping in urban areas

    Jantien Stoter;Henk de Kluijver;Vinaykumar Kurakula

  • 5D data modelling: full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter

  • City3D: Large-Scale Building Reconstruction from Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds

    Unknown

  • Establishing an OGC Web Processing Service for generalization processes

    Theodor Foerster;Jantien Stoter

  • The Balance Between Geometry and Topology

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter;Wilko Quak;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Processing BIM and GIS Models in Practice: Experiences and Recommendations from a GeoBIM Project in The Netherlands

    Ken Arroyo Ohori;Abdoulaye A. Diakité;Thomas Krijnen;Hugo Ledoux

  • 3D GIS, where are we standing?

    J.E. Stoter;S. Zlatanova

  • 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks

    Fatih Döner;Rod Thompson;Rod Thompson;Jantien Stoter;Christiaan Lemmen

  • Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software

    Jantien E. Stoter;Dirk Burghardt;Cécile Duchêne;Blanca Baella

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugo Ledoux
Hugo Ledoux Delft University of Technology
Filip Biljecki
Filip Biljecki National University of Singapore
Peter van Oosterom
Peter van Oosterom Delft University of Technology
Xiang Zhang
Xiang Zhang University of Hong Kong
Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
George Vosselman
George Vosselman University of Twente
Menno-Jan Kraak
Menno-Jan Kraak University of Twente
Fabio Remondino
Fabio Remondino Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Dennis M. Akos
Dennis M. Akos University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees that can complement and expand your career options. For those interested in leadership roles within tech companies, consider earning an online executive mba. This qualification builds management skills and business acumen, perfect for tech professionals aiming for top positions.

If your interests intersect with data, libraries, or information management, gaining a library science masters could be a strategic move. Library science increasingly integrates technology, offering unique career paths in digital curation, archives, or information retrieval.

Cost is often a concern for international students. Fortunately, there are many affordable masters degrees offered online in fields like data science, cybersecurity, and software engineering. These programs offer flexibility and can be completed alongside work or internships.

For those focused on advanced leadership or research, a doctorate organizational leadership can help you develop high-level strategic and organizational skills vital in today’s tech-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Jantien Stoter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles