World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 5136 4996 75 70 320 9549

Jantien Stoter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jantien Stoter between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jantien Stoter published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 15.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 17 of the 409 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

409 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jantien Stoter: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 6
2001 3
2002 10
2003 14
2004 11
2005 12
2006 25
2007 7
2008 14
2009 8
2010 20
2011 24
2012 27
2013 24
2014 20
2015 11
2016 20
2017 13
2018 25
2019 16
2020 28
2021 14
2022 14
2023 8
2024 18
2025 16
2026 1
Total 409
Download as CSV

Jantien Stoter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jantien Stoter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 312–321 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 320 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238 320
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jantien Stoter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jantien Stoter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Jantien Stoter is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research lies primarily in engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with a strong emphasis on building and construction, geology, geochemistry and petrology, environmental engineering, and geography, planning and development.

Their scholarly work focuses on various specialized topics including:

  • 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • BIM and Construction Integration
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

Jantien Stoter has contributed to multiple frequently published venues including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions in GIS

Frequent collaborators in their publications include Ken Arroyo Ohori, Francesca Noardo, Filip Biljecki, Claire Ellul, and Thomas Krijnen.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jantien Stoter include:

  • Challenges of urban digital twins: A systematic review and a Delphi expert survey, 2023, Automation in Construction
  • City3D: Large-Scale Building Reconstruction from Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • Automated 3D Reconstruction of LoD2 and LoD1 Models for All 10 Million Buildings of the Netherlands, 2022, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
  • Tools for BIM-GIS Integration (IFC Georeferencing and Conversions): Results from the GeoBIM Benchmark 2019, 2020, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • 3D building metrics for urban morphology, 2022, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems

Best Publications

  • Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review

    Filip Biljecki;Jantien E. Stoter;Hugo Ledoux;Sisi Zlatanova

  • An improved LOD specification for 3D building models

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • 3D Cadastre in an International Context : Legal, Organizational, and Technological Aspects

    Jantien E. Stoter;Peter van Oosterom

  • Formalisation of the level of detail in 3D city modelling

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter;Junqiao Zhao;Junqiao Zhao

  • The core cadastral domain model

    Peter van Oosterom;Christiaan Lemmen;Tryggvi Ingvarsson;Paul van der Molen

  • Modelling 3D spatial objects in a geo-DBMS using a 3D primitive

    Clin Arens;Jantien Stoter;Peter van Oosterom

  • Noise mapping and GIS: optimising quality and efficiency of noise effect studies

    Henk de Kluijver;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Generating 3D city models without elevation data

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Automatic conversion of IFC datasets to geometrically and semantically correct CityGML LOD3 buildings

    Sjors Donkers;Hugo Ledoux;Junqiao Zhao;Jantien E. Stoter

  • TOWARDS A 3D CADASTRE: WHERE DO CADASTRAL NEEDS AND TECHNICAL POSSIBILITIES MEET?

    Jantien E. Stoter;Martin Salzmann

  • Building pattern recognition in topographic data: examples on collinear and curvilinear alignments

    Xiang Zhang;Tinghua Ai;Jantien Stoter;Menno-Jan Kraak

  • AdTree: Accurate, Detailed, and Automatic Modelling of Laser-Scanned Trees

    Shenglan Du;Roderik Lindenbergh;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • 3D noise mapping in urban areas

    Jantien Stoter;Henk de Kluijver;Vinaykumar Kurakula

  • 5D data modelling: full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter

  • City3D: Large-Scale Building Reconstruction from Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds

    Unknown

  • Establishing an OGC Web Processing Service for generalization processes

    Theodor Foerster;Jantien Stoter

  • The Balance Between Geometry and Topology

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter;Wilko Quak;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Processing BIM and GIS Models in Practice: Experiences and Recommendations from a GeoBIM Project in The Netherlands

    Ken Arroyo Ohori;Abdoulaye A. Diakité;Thomas Krijnen;Hugo Ledoux

  • 3D GIS, where are we standing?

    J.E. Stoter;S. Zlatanova

  • 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks

    Fatih Döner;Rod Thompson;Rod Thompson;Jantien Stoter;Christiaan Lemmen

  • Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software

    Jantien E. Stoter;Dirk Burghardt;Cécile Duchêne;Blanca Baella

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugo Ledoux
Hugo Ledoux Delft University of Technology
Filip Biljecki
Filip Biljecki National University of Singapore
Peter van Oosterom
Peter van Oosterom Delft University of Technology
Xiang Zhang
Xiang Zhang University of Hong Kong
Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
George Vosselman
George Vosselman University of Twente
Menno-Jan Kraak
Menno-Jan Kraak University of Twente
Fabio Remondino
Fabio Remondino Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Dennis M. Akos
Dennis M. Akos University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees that can complement and expand your career options. For those interested in leadership roles within tech companies, consider earning an online executive mba. This qualification builds management skills and business acumen, perfect for tech professionals aiming for top positions.

If your interests intersect with data, libraries, or information management, gaining a library science masters could be a strategic move. Library science increasingly integrates technology, offering unique career paths in digital curation, archives, or information retrieval.

Cost is often a concern for international students. Fortunately, there are many affordable masters degrees offered online in fields like data science, cybersecurity, and software engineering. These programs offer flexibility and can be completed alongside work or internships.

For those focused on advanced leadership or research, a doctorate organizational leadership can help you develop high-level strategic and organizational skills vital in today’s tech-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Jantien Stoter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles