World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carliss Y. Baldwin

Carliss Y. Baldwin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 42 1441 1348 609 554 198 22025

Carliss Y. Baldwin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carliss Y. Baldwin between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carliss Y. Baldwin published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 4 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1974 2025

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carliss Y. Baldwin: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 5
1983 6
1984 4
1985 0
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 8
1998 3
1999 10
2000 4
2001 3
2002 7
2003 11
2004 1
2005 3
2006 11
2007 9
2008 6
2009 6
2010 9
2011 9
2012 16
2013 5
2014 14
2015 7
2016 6
2017 6
2018 2
2019 7
2020 9
2021 9
2022 11
2023 1
2024 2
2025 2
Total 232
Download as CSV

Carliss Y. Baldwin publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carliss Y. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–199 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 198 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37 198
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Carliss Y. Baldwin D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carliss Y. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80 42
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Carliss Y. Baldwin is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their scholarly work predominantly focuses on Strategy and Management, with significant involvement in Management Science and Operations Research as well as Economics and Econometrics.

Their research covers several subfields and topics, including:

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Sociology and Political Science

Key areas of research interest are:

  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Product Development and Customization
  • Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Auction Theory and Applications

Baldwin has published frequently in venues such as the SSRN Electronic Journal, Academy of Management Proceedings, and Research Policy. Their most common publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Research Policy
  • California Management Review
  • Industrial and Corporate Change

Significant recent papers authored by Baldwin include:

  • Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies, 2024, Research Policy
  • Design rules: past and future, 2022, Industrial and Corporate Change
  • Design Rules, Volume 2: Chapter 5-Ecosystems and Complementarities, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Design Rules, Volume 2: Chapter 12-The Planar Process and Moore's Law, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Marcel Bogers
  • Michael G. Jacobides
  • Rahul Kapoor
  • Joel West
  • Marcus Holgersson

Best Publications

  • Design Rules: The Power of Modularity

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • MANAGING IN AN AGE OF MODULARITY

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation

    Carliss Baldwin;Eric von Hippel

  • Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;C. Jason Woodard

  • How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Christopher Hienerth;Eric Von Hippel

  • Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code

    Alan MacCormack;John Rusnak;Carliss Y. Baldwin

  • The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model?

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms

    Carliss Y. Baldwin

  • Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • The mirroring hypothesis: theory, evidence, and exceptions

    Lyra J. Colfer;Carliss Young Baldwin

  • Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the 'mirroring' hypothesis

    Alan D. Maccormack;Carliss Young Baldwin;John Rusnak

  • Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • The power of modularity

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • Productivity and Labor Unions: An Application of the Theory of Self- Enforcing Contracts

    Carliss Y. Baldwin

  • Optimal Sequential Investment When Capital is Not Readily Reversible

    Carliss Y. Baldwin

  • CAPABILITIES AND CAPITAL INVESTMENT: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON CAPITAL BUDGETING

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim B. Clark

  • The Resolution of Claims in Financial Distress the Case of Massey Ferguson

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Scott P. Mason

  • Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Eric A. von Hippel

  • Organization Design for Business Ecosystems

    Carliss Young Baldwin

  • Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems

    Karim R. Lakhani;Kevin J. Boudreau;Kevin J. Boudreau;Po-Ru Loh;Lars Backstrom

  • The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field

    Sandeep Purao;Carliss Y. Baldwin;Alan R. Hevner;Veda C. Storey

  • How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study

    Christoph Hienerth;Eric A. von Hippel;Carliss Y. Baldwin

  • The Option Value of Modularity in Design An Example from Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity

    Carliss Y. Baldwin;Kim Clark;Kim Clark;Kim Clark

Frequent Co-Authors

Kim B. Clark
Kim B. Clark Brigham Young University
Joachim Henkel
Joachim Henkel Technical University of Munich
Michael G. Jacobides
Michael G. Jacobides London Business School
Michael C. Jensen
Michael C. Jensen Harvard University
Ron Adner
Ron Adner Dartmouth College
Constance E. Helfat
Constance E. Helfat Dartmouth College
Jan Pries-Heje
Jan Pries-Heje Roskilde University
Alan R. Hevner
Alan R. Hevner University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA opens up a variety of career options and online degree pathways. Many students are now choosing flexible, accelerated programs to fast-track their careers. If you're looking for options outside traditional business studies, consider an construction management degree or explore online programs for healthcare administration, both of which are in high demand.

For those wanting to complete their education quickly, choosing an accelerated degree can reduce time and costs, while still delivering the credentials needed for success. Cost is another important consideration, and there are many options from affordable online business degree programs to help meet your budget.

Finding the right degree and career pathway comes down to your interests, desired timeline, and long-term goals. Online learning makes quality education more accessible, whether you aim for a specialized career or broader business leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Carliss Y. Baldwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles